Flying without insurance?
Keeping Danny in Sandwiches
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flying without insurance?
On the thread "Capt. settles"
<a href="http://www.pprune.org/ubb/NonCGI/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=1&t=017020" target="_blank">http://www.pprune.org/ubb/NonCGI/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=1&t=017020</a> comment is made about incorrectly interpreting the 900hr limit as airborne time. The implication of this is that pilots exceeded the legal 900hr., 12month limit on Block time.
I have always understood that knowing extending the FTL’s beyond the legal maximum invalidates the insurance cover of an airline. Is this correct and what are the implications?
<a href="http://www.pprune.org/ubb/NonCGI/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=1&t=017020" target="_blank">http://www.pprune.org/ubb/NonCGI/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=1&t=017020</a> comment is made about incorrectly interpreting the 900hr limit as airborne time. The implication of this is that pilots exceeded the legal 900hr., 12month limit on Block time.
I have always understood that knowing extending the FTL’s beyond the legal maximum invalidates the insurance cover of an airline. Is this correct and what are the implications?
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ireland
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An additional factor here was the method of calculation. i.e. a 12 month span in month increments or daily recalculation of the preceding 365 days, which can yield differing results.
I don't know if this was resolved before the dismissal case.
Anybody have an update on the IAA position?
<img src="confused.gif" border="0">
I don't know if this was resolved before the dismissal case.
Anybody have an update on the IAA position?
<img src="confused.gif" border="0">
