Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

AA emergency at MAN

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

AA emergency at MAN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 13:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AA emergency at MAN

Hi all,

an AA flight has been diverted to MAN on full emergency.
Heard it was a hydrolic problem....not too many details....aircraft is on the runway surrounded by fire crews...pax being offloaded on runway.

Airport is closed for "1 hour" as of 1435
hard_landing is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 13:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard they have a hydraulic problem, burst some tires on touchdown and the fire service sprayed foam around them. Not sure if that's true or not but everything has left the hold and is diverting.
RingwaySam is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 14:40
  #3 (permalink)  
S78
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: not entirely sure.....
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MAN is closed until 17:00


S78
S78 is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 15:30
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: west sussex
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Runway reopening now
barrythecat is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 15:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MY sister in law was on flight, PAX told to adopt brace positions.
timpara is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 15:56
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Manchester airport closed?

Anyone know about manchester airport been closed due to plane stuck on runway?
not-another1 is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 16:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ongoing thread

Hi, thread already running on this event, AA diversion on emergency.
mechelec is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 16:06
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AA B767 outbound to Chicago suffered a hydraulic problem and returned to MAN. I was on Concorde's flight deck (conducting tours) and had a grandstand view of the landing - fast and shallow, and lots of smoke on touchdown (rumour is 2 tyres blew on landing).

It stopped on the runway (23R) with overheated brakes and was there for a long time, surrounded by fire and other services. Pax taken off eventually, then aircraft towed clear about 16:20, part flap still extended.

23L is closed for maintenance, so the 767 blocking 23R meant the airport was closed for most of the afternoon.

SSD
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 16:21
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Huh huh huh ... what was the question again?
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/m...er/7260747.stm

The Chicago-bound American Airlines flight turned back to the airport after engineers spotted a problem with its hydraulics shortly after take-off.
Really???????
Beavis and Butthead is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 16:37
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 951
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Why not?

Don't airlines have real-time data links to base engineering these days? Or perhaps AA carries an F/E?

I don't know. But it seems perfectly possible to me that engineers spotted the fault.

Even though it was probably the pilots.
old,not bold is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 18:11
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: _
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shaggy Sheep Driver - Irrespective of the malfunction, we don't do "fast and shallow". Fast it might have seemed, but we don't ever (and I mean never, ever) duck under the glidepath to enhance the landing performance in any way. Trust me, I've seen a heavy weight flapless landing done for real in a Jumbo, and it works exactly like it does in the sim, 3 degrees, 2 reds/2 whites the whole way down!
dontdoit is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 18:11
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

it had already returned to stand after initial taxi out, got fixed, departed and came back again, guess it wasn't fixed then.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 18:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shaggy Sheep Driver - Irrespective of the malfunction, we don't do "fast and shallow". Fast it might have seemed, but we don't ever (and I mean never, ever) duck under the glidepath to enhance the landing performance in any way. Trust me, I've seen a heavy weight flapless landing done for real in a Jumbo, and it works exactly like it does in the sim, 3 degrees, 2 reds/2 whites the whole way down!
I never suggested any glidesope ducking - That would be highly unprofessional (and uneccessary and dangerous etc etc) and certainly not implied by me re this landing, which I'm sure was carried out with consumate professionalism.

The 'shallow' comes in the flare..... atouchdown (following a standard if slightly fast approach) at a less nose-high attitude than usual, resulting in a faster and 'less held off' landing. I presume (don't know) that this is because the hydraulics failure meant less flap was available, the stall speed higher than normal, meaning a faster less held-off touchdown had to be performed.

That's what I said was 'shallow'... the landing, not the approach.

SSD
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 18:53
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well the BBC reported it better than Independent Television News Limited 2008.
It is headlined on Virgin Media as American Airlines plane crash lands at Manchester, where do these idiots come from.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 18:55
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 658
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Looks like a Flap 20 landing from the picture, depending apon the landing weight it could've resulted in a speed over the fence in the region of 180kts or so.
Probably unlucky to have burst a couple of tyres me thinks.
Monarch Man is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 19:18
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As it was towed past us following the incident, I noted the flaps were still at an intermediate setting - a lot less than full extension and not showing much deflection either, so flaps 20 does seem likely.

SSD
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 19:59
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere between Cape Reinga and Invercargill
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is flap 20 a typical take-off setting? Perhaps they started to misbehave when starting to cleanup. My idea of flying a large aircraft is when I take up the club`s C172 (!). Would a typical response to a split flap condition in one of the big ones be to leave them where they were?
rottenlungs is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 20:38
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: An ATC centre this side of the moon.
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A few years back doing an ATC flight deck trip out of KSFO on an AA B767, shortly after departure we had an AICAS warning "LE STAB ASYM".....leading edge stabaliser assymetric!!! After much head scratching and talking to eng on the radio it was assumed to be a micro switch fault but the books said we had to return using minimum flap, this required an approach speed of 180kts....flight also heavy as 767 has no fuel dumping facility......I asked the capt. why no dumping facility, his comment was " The guy that designed this aircraft had his head up his arse at the time!!!" Anyway Mr Boeing reckons the aircraft can land no problem with max all up weight. On final approach the captain turned to me sitting in the jump seat and said the worse thing that will happen is we run off the end of the runway!!!!.....needless to say all went well and I am still here today to tell the story............I wonder if today was the same type of fault????
fisbangwollop is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 20:59
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: EGPT/ESVS
Posts: 755
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...are you sure it was a 767 'cos all the ones I've flown have had fuel jettison capability.
Or maybe I haven't flown the right ones
Floppy Link is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2008, 21:06
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denmark
Age: 79
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B767 fuel jettison

I flew the B-767-300ER for many years.
My company had 15 aircraft, and some of them had fuel jettison, some did not!
grebllaw123d is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.