Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Continental Jet Incident approaching TLV

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Continental Jet Incident approaching TLV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Apr 2007, 20:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ישראל
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Continental Jet Incident approaching TLV

Two Israeli Air Force jets were scrambled today when a Continental Jet lost radio contact approaching TLV airspace. Contact was only resumed once within 15kms from land. At this stage it was already in close contact with the two jets which were ready to act appropriately if need be. Just after it was discovered it was a true technical communication fault and not a hijacking, was the aircraft allowed to land at Ben Gurion Airport.
For my Hebrew speaking friends:
דרמה נוספת היום בנמל התעופה בן גוריון: מטוסי קרב של חיל האוויר הוזנקו הערב (11.4.07) לעבר מטוס של חברת קונטיננטל, ועליו 256 נוסעים, לאחר שנותק עימו הקשר. רק לאחר דקות ארוכות ומורטות עצבים הסתבר שמדובר בתקלה טכנית, והמטוס הורשה לנחות.ערנות גבוהה בנוגע לטרור אווירי
מטוסי חיל האוויר ליוו את המטוס עד שהקשר בינו לבין מגדל הפיקוח בנמל התעופה בן גוריון חודש, והוא הורשה לנחות בשדה התעופה. במערכת הביטחון קיימת ערנות גבוהה בכל הקשור לטרור אווירי, ולכן מטוסי קרב נמצאים בכוננות מתמדת.
הקשר עם המטוס אבד עם התקרבו לישראל, וחודש רק כשהיה במרחק של פחות מ-15 ק"מ מחופי הארץ. בשלב זה כבר היו מטוסי חיל האויר בקרבת מטוס הנוסעים, מוכנים להפילו אם ידרשו לכך. ראש הממשלה ושר הביטחון עודכנו בפרטי הדרמה, והרמטכ"ל ומפקד חיל האוויר היו בקשר עם אנשי חיל האוויר שניהלו את האירוע.
רשות התעופה וחיל האוויר חוקרים את האירוע
רק לאחר שהתברר מעל לכל ספק כי הסיבה לטיסה שלא על פי הנהלים היא תקלה טכנית במערכת הקשר, וכי לא מדובר במטוס חטוף, הורשה המטוס לנחות בנתב"ג.
דובר משרד התחבורה, אבנר עובדיה, סיפר כי "רשות התעופה האזרחית יחד עם חיל האוויר חוקרים את האירוע ואחד הכיוונים העיקריים הוא בעיות קשר במטוס עצמו". הדובר הוסיף כי מדובר בנוהל קבוע: "פנו אל המטוס ממגדל הפיקוח ולא היה מענה. התעורר חשד, והוחלט להזניק מטוסים ולבדוק שלא מדובר במטוס עוין. נוצר קשר עין עם הטייסים והפנו את המטוס לים".
No_Speed_Restriction is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2007, 21:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: washington,dc
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CNN just reported this story on Wolf blitzer's show.

during the course of a "handoff"/ frequency change something went amiss somewhere by someone.

but who?

CAL says their pilots did procedures correctly.

it would seem that the Israeli fighter pilots were quite prudent in their actions too.

just seems to prove that the radio is as important as the wing to modern aviation .
bomarc is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2007, 21:23
  #3 (permalink)  
Bellwether&cloudbuster
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bristol UK
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How Google News sees it.

http://news.google.co.uk/news?ie=UTF...15272356&hl=en
Julian Hensey is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2007, 21:38
  #4 (permalink)  
sir.pratt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
just seems to prove that the radio is as important as the wing to modern aviation .
so why didn't it fall out of the sky when the radio failed to work?

aviate
navigate
communicate.


it comes last for a reason.
 
Old 11th Apr 2007, 22:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: washington,dc
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it came close to being shot down...4 jet fighters scrabled...that is quite a response to NORDO.

the radio started working , explanations understood, and they didn't fall (read shot down) out of the sky
bomarc is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2007, 22:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,088
Received 58 Likes on 36 Posts
"it came close to being shot down"

Really?

Evidence please, and being intercepted doesn't meet the burden of proof.
West Coast is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2007, 23:05
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: washington,dc
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have NO evidence other than published reports...here is one that should interest you. It is from USAToday online and was just posted...it also quotes the Jerusalem Post.

Israelis: We came close to shooting down American passenger jet

Israeli fighters buzzed an American jet this afternoon after the civilian aircraft failed to check in with the airport on its approach to Israel.

"This was the closest we ever came to intercepting a civilian airplane," a military officer tells the Jerusalem Post.

The paper says Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and his top generals were put on alert in case they had to authorize the military pilots to shoot down the Continental Airlines flight, carrying 273 people, as it approached Israeli airspace.

The fighter jets conducted a visual inspection when the plane was within five minutes of Tel Aviv.

"From the moment that we lost contact with (the jet) we treated the incident as a possible terror act. When the fighter jets approached the plane, they guided it west. It contacted us and that's how we were sure it was not a terror attempt," a source tells Ynet News
bomarc is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2007, 01:55
  #8 (permalink)  
Buttonpusher
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bloody Hell
Age: 65
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Was there a call from XXX nm out or was guard monitored ?? We'll see....
FLCH is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2007, 02:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Miami, Florida, USA
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did the Israelis know to contact CO's System Ops Center and get the flight dispatcher to send an ACARs message to the crew to come up on the appropriate frequency? This would have solved the problem in a few moments. This is done all of the time with US carriers and no interceptors are launched. US Part 121 carriers are required to have a separate comm system to be able to do this. It is routine in the case of lost comms.
kellmark is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2007, 03:22
  #10 (permalink)  
PPRuNe supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think if I operated in that part of the world, I would make a prudent effort to monitor 121.5.
Dream Land is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2007, 11:24
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Geosynchronous
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone still game to take Continental from Newark to Tel Aviv?

Either the most dangerous or luckiest route going, depending on which way you look at it!


(QV: Current pprune thread on the 777 engine failure)
Another Number is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2007, 15:37
  #12 (permalink)  
F4F
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: on the Blue Planet
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are we once more just targets for the military?

Israelis: We came close to shooting down American passenger jet

Israeli fighters buzzed an American jet this afternoon after the civilian aircraft failed to check in with the airport on its approach to Israel.

"This was the closest we ever came to intercepting a civilian airplane," a military officer tells the Jerusalem Post.

The paper says Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and his top generals were put on alert in case they had to authorize the military pilots to shoot down the Continental Airlines flight, carrying 273 people, as it approached Israeli airspace.

The fighter jets conducted a visual inspection when the plane was within five minutes of Tel Aviv.

"From the moment that we lost contact with (the jet) we treated the incident as a possible terror act. When the fighter jets approached the plane, they guided it west. It contacted us and that's how we were sure it was not a terror attempt," a source tells Ynet News.


Reading this makes my blood boil in anger and sadness, what kinda world are we living in?

Please, armies of the World, stop killing innocent people!
F4F is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2007, 15:44
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: MAN
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems reasonable to me. They appear to have been close to "fully" intercepting this Conny. Should the Pilots have follow the ICAO Interception procedures, they will remain bound for their Destination. Fail and you will be escorted to an Airforce Base. Fail to follow that instruction then its-

"Game Over"

The military procs' are there to protect the majority!
Dogma is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2007, 15:48
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 43
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your blood boils at SOP in sending an interceptor to look at an airliner that has lost contact?
You are angry about what?
No one was killed, a sensible precaution was taken. The aircraft didn't fly into any civilian target. A good says work for all concerned.
What is your practical and constructive suggestion? Sit upon one's hands and hope it's R/T failure and not aiming for the Knesset?
Sheeessh! All together now, KUM BAH YA M'LORD KUM BAH YAH.
Come on you middle eastern chaps, DO sing up.
F4F - go find a darkend room and lie down.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2007, 16:44
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: washington,dc
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if the 777 crew KNEW they had a com failure, then they might have done the 76 trombones thing.

(slang: squak 7600, lost com)

so they didn't know.

must be a long flight...a little tired upfront?

who knows...but no one can ever take another chance
bomarc is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2007, 18:38
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I really don't believe news reports with any official attribution bragging about how close they came to shooting down an airliner that was not being communicative. We expect step by step procedures no more no less
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2007, 21:59
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Albuquerque USA
Posts: 174
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deterrence considerations

I really don't believe news reports with any official attribution bragging about how close they came to shooting down an airliner that was not being communicative. We expect step by step procedures no more no less
If interception ever reaches the point of actually shooting, a hideous outcome has already occurred, even if a yet more hideous one is averted.
To make that less likely, a deterrence point of view requires that it both be true and that it believed to be true that the ultimate action can and will be taken at need.
Given the adversaries of interest, press reports of this kind may be about the main tool available to deter perpetrators who can be persuaded that their effort on this method will fail.
archae86 is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2007, 22:26
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Harvest, Alabama
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I fly this route a lot. From the FIR to the ADIZ is not very far. Maybe 30 minutes from touchdown. Not a lot of time to second guess.

Sounds like all of the procedures worked. No matter what happened to cause it.

If any of you slept peacefully in Tel Aviv after a long flight, it was precisely BECAUSE of the intense security that you slept well.
singpilot is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2007, 11:24
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: at the edge of the alps
Posts: 449
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The German "Supreme Court" (Bundesverfassungsgericht, i.e. the court watching over the constitution) last year ruled that the interception of civil aircraft on the suspicion that they might constitute a danger is unconstitutional as it puts one life against another which is not a right of the state to do.

Sounds civilized to me.
Alpine Flyer is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2007, 16:16
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,088
Received 58 Likes on 36 Posts
Should a German building come down from an airliner, I imagine that ruling will be revisited.
West Coast is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.