Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Long haul or what!!

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Long haul or what!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Dec 2006, 22:36
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Cat will fly between 20 and 24 hours on the normal fuel tanks, depending on power settings.

Longest flight I ever did was 19:10 in the Arctic in 1968....lots of time for sexual thoughts just to pass the time.

http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e3...h/aaf4e977.jpg

It's just much fun to fly through a bridge as under one.


http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e3...h/NR3R3546.jpg

One more:

http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e3...imountains.jpg





Chuck E.
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2006, 22:38
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once met a guy who was in the air for over 56 hours, only landed cause the dunnies were full.
Fat Boy Sim is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2006, 00:28
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 411
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
The ULR rest rules which SIA use on these flights give the crew considerably better rest than is achieved on normal long haul sectors by all accounts. I addition, as someone pointed out, they have lots of time off since they get to the flight time limitation quite quickly and they also receive extra pay for flying over 16 hour sectors. I guess it's horses for course but the guys who are doing it seemed to be quite happy.
As regards SLF getting bored on such long flights, anyone who has experienced SIA's IFE will be able to dismiss that idea: it's awesome with over 400 choices and individual video on demand and laptop power points in every seat. Now my last trip on BA longhaul was boring. How old is that IFE system?
Fly3 is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2006, 00:43
  #24 (permalink)  
UP and Down Operator
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Me think those 400 choices must be available on the flightdeck as well. Maybe those modern eastern people can swap the PFD display with some good oldfashion western movies when flying over the states, and some fancy porn when passing Europe
 
Old 15th Dec 2006, 11:36
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
If this a guessing game on Scoggs:
Me thinks Herc--Ascension-southbound to a certain combat zone AND return to the Rock!!! 1982. Am I right??
GF
Yes!

Scroggs
scroggs is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2006, 18:17
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah Scroggs, we know who you are you scruffy git!! I guess Ascension must have looked pretty good out the window after so long in the loominum tube! I was on another C130 squadron at the time but I was there with you! Happy days huh!! Not.....
Smudger is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2006, 20:07
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeh, tell me about it. I'm 6ft 5 and that's not fun in any kind of seat, bus, first, whatever

It's bad enough on 1-2 hour flight, impagine 18hrs.

If you think about it, if the airline put animals (a dog or cat) in the seat, made them check-in, line-up on the airbridge etc, etc they'd be busted for crulety to animals. But hey ! it's only pax so treat em how you like !!!!
highflyin is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2006, 10:09
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, the total flight duration records are probably still held by airships as they moved very slow, however they had superior crew rest facilities and enough crew on them in the first place
Searching through the FAI database i found some pretty impressive records, over 55 hours in a single seat glider plane for example or over 57 hours in a double seat glider plane. If i remember correctly the FAI ceased to accept duration flight record applications in the 50ies as they considered them as too dangerous.
Denti is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2006, 14:14
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Close to space
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once did a 12 hour leg.......in a Shorts 360. Yes we did have ferry tanks.
helldog is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2006, 15:33
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
55 hrs 17 mins unrefuelled

This was the world record holder for unrefuelled piston-engined endurance for over 40 YEARS until Burt Rutan's Voyager circumnavigated the globe:

"In late September 1946 a new milestone in aviation history was set, an 11,236-mile non-stop, non-refueled flight from Perth, Australia to Columbus, Ohio. The plane, a US Navy Neptune patrol aircraft, manufactured by Lockheed and nicknamed "Truculent Turtle," was specially fitted with extra gasoline tanks to test its capacity for long-distance flight.

The crew of four made the trip in 55 hours and 17 minutes, at an average speed of 204 mph. Their only passenger was a young kangaroo named Joey, a gift from the Australian people to the National Zoo in Washington."

http://www.geocities.com/lucktam/awa...1.htm#tructurt
EGAC is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 14:50
  #31 (permalink)  
Too mean to buy a long personal title
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,968
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Rainboe
Travel almost halfway around the world, in one go? It either floats your boat or not.
Trust me, if I could get from LHR to SYD in one hop, I'd be on it, even in economy.
Globaliser is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 15:41
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Limbricht
Posts: 2,194
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Posted by Globaliser:
Trust me, if I could get from LHR to SYD in one hop, I'd be on it, even in economy.
Trust me, I wouldn't, not even in First!

But I admit that I'm most probably in the minority.
Avman is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 15:45
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,652
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
I have here the airship timetable for Germany - South America in 1939.

Depart Frankfurt Wednesday evening, arrive Recife, Brasil Saturday evening. On to Rio (possibly the same crew) to arrive Rio Sunday evening.

And if you thought that was long enough, the return took an EXTRA day.

It's 4153 nm Recife to Frankfurt so for the 4 days of the eastbound trip they averaged 43 knots.
WHBM is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 16:20
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Asgard
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WHBM

I believe there was one occasion when, due to civil unrest at the destination, the captain pointed his Zeppelin into wind while some way off the South American coast, reduced speed, and sat there for a couple of days until the commotion was over.
Loki is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 18:03
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: @Work
Age: 60
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My last trip DXB to JFK 15h 15 min. A345. About 6.30h in the bunk, movie and some rest then back in the seat for an approach to 31R on a clear cool NY winterday . A short 11h 50 min return leg back to Du..isneyland. 2JFK's and a far eastern trip would be a decent month. I wish they didn't throw in that night Hyderabad, Cochin and SIM support to top it off
AutoAbort is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2007, 08:21
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,652
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Loki
I believe there was one occasion when, due to civil unrest at the destination, the captain pointed his Zeppelin into wind while some way off the South American coast, reduced speed, and sat there for a couple of days until the commotion was over.
I shall never complain about the Bovingdon hold again
WHBM is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2007, 10:14
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Talking of long endurance flights, Guinness say that the longest ever (excluding space flight) was airborne for just under 65 days, from Dec 58 until Feb 59. It was a Cessna 172 with 2 on board, with long range tanks that allowed it to fly for about 24 hours between refuelling, which was done by flying at 20 ft above a fuel tanker and picking up a hose. Only saw a brief entry about it on the internet, so I don’t know how they managed for food etc, presumably that was also picked up in flight from a chase vehicle.
farsouth is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2007, 11:21
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,652
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by farsouth
Talking of long endurance flights, Guinness say that the longest ever (excluding space flight) was airborne for just under 65 days, from Dec 58 until Feb 59. It was a Cessna 172 with 2 on board, with long range tanks that allowed it to fly for about 24 hours between refuelling, which was done by flying at 20 ft above a fuel tanker and picking up a hose. Only saw a brief entry about it on the internet, so I don’t know how they managed for food etc, presumably that was also picked up in flight from a chase vehicle.
The C172 in question now hangs in the terminal at Las Vegas International airport:

"Another exhibit hangs directly over the baggage claim area: A plane that, in 1959, was used in setting a nonstop flying record -- 64 days, 22 hours, 19 minutes, 5 seconds -- that still stands.

Refueling was done on the fly, from a fuel truck that followed the plane on the ground. The pilots lifted baskets of food into the plane by rope. And, the answer to the inevitable question -- a small portable toilet seat -- is displayed in a nearby glass case."

http://www.lvrj.com/lvrj_home/2000/O...hotos/timm.jpg

1. Assuming that the C172 was travelling at 65 kts during fuel pickup, how far would it have to go at synchronised speed with the tanker to refuel ? I would expect many miles.

2. I can't quite see how a C172 with 2pob would have enough capability to lift 24 hours endurance of fuel.

3. If you were going for an endurance record you would surely go for a retractable and a constant speed prop.

4. What did they do for oil (the C172 of that vintage being a typical GA oil guzzler) ?

5. You would have to be VERY good friends with your fellow pilot ! And indeed with that tanker driver 20 feet below.

Last edited by WHBM; 16th Jan 2007 at 15:12. Reason: The oil point
WHBM is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2007, 11:37
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now that's proper hour building !
Will Hung is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2007, 11:44
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thai Airways A345 BKK-JFK over the pole 17:17
GlueBall is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.