Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Aircraft flies next sector after tailstrike

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Aircraft flies next sector after tailstrike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Sep 2006, 10:52
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balmullo,Scotland
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DozyWannabe
I *think* that the 10,000 cycle calculation took the improper repair into account and that a correctly repaired bulkhead would have lasted the natural life of the airframe. Also, if I remember correctly, once the bulkhead patches were in place it was difficult to see from the front that the splice only had one rivet line taking the strain and it wasn't until you saw it from the back that it became obvious. Amplifying the tragedy was that the Boeing engineer responsible for supervising the repair later took his own life, as did several JAL employees.
And yes, this was the first known incident where steering by thrust was attempted. Unfortunately the loss of the vertical stabiliser in this case (as opposed to UAL232 and DHL, where the empennage remained intact) made control practically impossible.
As for the original subject of the thread, I wonder if revisiting the aforementioned incidents in training, including that of ground crew would help sharpen focus on the seriousness of preflight checks?
Dozy when I did My B747 type rating(engineering) the JAL incident was taught on the first day.
matkat is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 12:26
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by matkat
Dozy when I did My B747 type rating(engineering) the JAL incident was taught on the first day.
Great.

I was thinking more about applying it generally than to a specific type though - and was referring more to the BMI DUB incident where the walkround missed significant damage than to the JAL incident where the damage was impossible to see on the walkround (I guess Aloha 243 would be useful as well).

My previous remark was more of a musing than criticism though...
DozyWannabe is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2006, 14:45
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Far east
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thought this was about Slovak ?
Clearly something needs to be done about these guys all these 'new' eu carriers should be operating jar rules - views?
rumair999 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.