Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

JAL plane flew with engine thrust reverser locked

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

JAL plane flew with engine thrust reverser locked

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jan 2006, 03:33
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: JAL plane flew with engine thrust reverser locked

Originally Posted by spannersatcx
Not worked on RR 747's then!
Or L-1011's!
glhcarl is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2006, 04:12
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: JAL plane flew with engine thrust reverser locked

As previously reported flying with TR's locked out only restricts things like accepting Land and Hold Short clearances. Normal operating procedures in our airline. AA is one of the most anal conservative airlines out there.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2006, 16:49
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No one disputes that it is not uncommon to fly with an inop reverser. The fact that it apparently was not placarded as inop for the flight crew is a legitimate concern.
Alty is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 01:40
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Japan
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I won't comment on the technical seriousness or not of this incident but for JAL it signals quite a lot of potential trouble from the Japanese authorities and travelling public.

This is another in a longish line of mostly non-events with JAL that has been leaped on by the Japanese regulators and media. JAL were issued a formal warning about it's safety and operational procedures last year (March I think) and following this they have been given a second warning (Jan 9th). Two strikes out of 3! Any more repetitions and the Ministry could impose serious sanctions on JAL.

Public confidence in JAL has already been affected and load factors are down I believe, especially on domestic routes where ANA offer an alternative. As usual, the media have been hunting down any similar events with ANA as well, so they have not been immune from criticism too.

PTH (currently located in Japan)
PTH needs tarmac is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 10:36
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Vietnam
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did happen to me to take off with a perfect aircraft and after landing had only one reverser, really no big surprise on B767 300 ER
The reason it is a big story this is because in Japan you have a penalty of minus 8000 pounds on Take OFF and that thrust reverser are include in performance fot take OFF and landing which is not the case with FAA or JAR
LindbergB767 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.