Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Airlines to be Grounded Over Changes in Insurance Rules?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Airlines to be Grounded Over Changes in Insurance Rules?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Sep 2001, 19:35
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Radio 5 Live just announced that HMG has agreed to meet the third party liability for airline insurance. Not sure if this is a complete solution, don't ahve the details through yet.
wallup is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2001, 20:01
  #42 (permalink)  

Don Quixote Impersonator
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 77
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Geez what a bunch of girls.

The Guv, love him or hate him, brings, what is a fairly vexed situation to your attention and all the most of you can do is bitch and moan about Guvs real or imagined shortcomings, meanwhile the rest of Rome burns.

BFU thank you for that, the US Plate glass premium income v airlines sorta puts the whole argument in perspective.

Who'd want to be a name.
gaunty is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2001, 21:57
  #43 (permalink)  
CR2

Top Dog
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Close to FACT
Age: 55
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Read Guv's 210905
Hit's the nail on the head. Commercial aviation faces grounding effective week 40. Govt. intervention required to keep the big pax airlines afloat.
CR2 is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2001, 16:24
  #44 (permalink)  
The Guvnor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

From today's Sunday Times:

EU deal to cover airline risks
David Smith and Michael Prescott


EUROPEAN finance ministers meeting in Liège, Belgium, yesterday, stepped in to head off the immediate crisis in the airline industry.

After Friday's announcement by Gordon Brown that the government would act as guarantor to provide British airlines with insurance cover against third party risk - damage to property and people on the ground - other European Union members agreed on similar measures.

There had been fears that without such cover, initially for 30 days, many airlines would have been grounded this week.

The EU ministers also agreed to speed up ratification of a United Nations resolution calling for a freezing of all Taliban
assets.

In an effort to show that the world economy is operating normally in the wake of Wall Street's worst week since 1933, the Liège meeting announced that the Group of Seven would meet in Washington on October 6. Interest rates in Britain and America are set to fall further before then. The meeting had been scheduled for next weekend but was cancelled.

George W Bush, in his weekly address to the American people, also tried to offer reassurance. "Our economy has had a shock," he said, noting many workers had lost their jobs last week, especially in the airline and tourism businesses. "Yet, for all these challenges, the American economy is fundamentally strong."

The chancellor hinted yesterday that governments were ready to pay for better security at airports and on planes. The British Airline Pilots' Association said extra security was urgent.

"The focus must be on stopping terrorists and preventing disruptive passengers from boarding our aircraft in the first place," said Captain Ian Hibberd, a spokesman. Pilots believe a computer system to check the names and profiles of passengers would be more effective than strengthened cockpit doors or guards.

Airline ticket computers would be linked to a central database on which the names of terrorist suspects could be entered, as well as profiles of "unusual" passengers. El Al, the Israeli airline, uses passenger profiling to identify potential troublemakers before they board flights.
 
Old 23rd Sep 2001, 16:46
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: london
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

What about airlines that dont have the backing of their Governments for war risk insurance - how will thay fly after 23.59 tomorrow?
palmtree is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2001, 17:21
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: europe
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Yep,
It seems us small biz-jet AOC holders are also about to be grounded due the insurance thing..
Can somebody non-airline please confirm if this is true.
LRdriver is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2001, 17:51
  #47 (permalink)  
The Guvnor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Palmtree - my understanding is that anyone that does not have the requisite third party liability cover will be grounded. This cover is required by lessors as well as by airports and aviation authorities as part of their AOC approvals - and the new insurance industry limit of US$50m per incident falls well below the required levels.

[ 23 September 2001: Message edited by: The Guvnor ]
 
Old 23rd Sep 2001, 19:21
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

You can now expect an increase in company-owned and time-share exec jets (for those companies that can afford same, in the US anyway) as a way around security concerns as these aircraft are not required to carry the very high third party insurance cover required of Bizjet charter AOC operators. Here in the USA, the insurance problem appears to have been solved, at least in the short term. Longer term it will have a profound effect on the bottom line of ALL airlines and bizjet charter operators. Suspect that a few airlines will not survive to have a bottom line at all, ala Midway-style.
Those that do not have an understanding of the insurance business had best keep it that way, least they have many sleepless nights.
411A is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2001, 20:04
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Intentionally Left Blank
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

I understand that GF have until 1700 (BAH) tomorrow (24-9-01) to get the additional underwriting in place or the airline will be grounded.
Icarus is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2001, 00:11
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Not the least bit surprised...after the GF072 fiasco, I am astonished to find that they are able to obtain insurance cover at all, at what would be considered by others to be a reasonable cost. And with EK cleaning their clock in the traffic department, the end may well be near.
411A is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2001, 01:53
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

411A you seem to have a responce on every single subject. When exactly did you get appointed on the AIB of GF072 and you have formulated an oppinion of it being a fiasco?
Have you nothing better to do than constantly expose your vitriolic character?
CaptA320 is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2001, 07:57
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Well there CaptA320, I seem to have struck a nerve. Don't know about the AIB and the report it should have published by now, but the whole GF072 accident was a complete fiasco, complete with the swan dive into the Arabian Gulf.
Why has the final report not been published?
411A is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2001, 09:41
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The destruction of the WTC and the damage at the Pentagon, as well as the killings and injuries sustained, and the aircraft destroyed, was an act of war. The cost of war is carried by the nation at war and when it is over, hopefully by reparations from the vanquished.
What is wrong with having the cost of the attacks in the USA being met by the USA government through taxation? This will let the insurance industry off the hook in this case and allow them to continue making their business at less swingeing rates. Part of the costs from any action like this in the future ( which I pray may never happen )should be attributed to the government of the country where the terrorists embarked. (This would provide an incentive to ensure proper security measures at airports.)
There is no doubt that our world has changed since September 11th. We must not let this horrendous event cause hardship and pain further than it has done.Let's get on with our normal lives. That is the best contribution we can all make to defeat terrorism. Are those who have stopped flying due to the perceived threat to danger in the air now going to stop breathing as the chance of a biological attack is promoted in the media? I despair.
simmy is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2001, 12:15
  #54 (permalink)  
The Guvnor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

Simmy, if what you say is correct, why would airlines need War Risks and Associated Perils cover?
 
Old 25th Sep 2001, 12:28
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Hounslow, Middlesex, UK
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The UK Government has introduced a short term scheme to provide indemnity for third part (war and terrorism) liabilities above US$50m. Apparently available to all holders of Type A or B air operator's licences (UK AOL holders) and aviation 'service providers' eg airports, ground handlers etc Maximum scheme limit is US$2billion. Premium rates are US$0.25 per pax carried for up to US$750m or US$0.50 per pax above US$750m. Premium for 'service providers' is 25% of gross premioums payable under their existing insurance.

An insurance company (Troika Insurance Co Ltd) has been established for the sole purpose of writing this cover. It is capitalised by HM Treasury who will also indemnify Troika against 100% of all liability and costs incurred.
MrNosy is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2001, 01:53
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

A Commercial operator not covered by the UK Gov is Manx Airlines, which had its` five aircraft grounded today.
wayward is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.