Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Capt. fired by fax

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Capt. fired by fax

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st September 2005 | 10:43
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: At home
N380UA

So I guess we will just have to kill the messenger who brought the bad news!

Last edited by LX-GB1; 1st September 2005 at 10:54.
LX-GB1 is offline  
Old 1st September 2005 | 10:46
  #22 (permalink)  
stilljustanothernumber
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: the night sky
For the A300-600 (and most twins, in fact), dispatch with an engine driven generator inop is permissible, provided the APU generator is used throughout the flight.
unwiseowl is offline  
Old 1st September 2005 | 10:47
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: this side of the hill
This story made the headlines here as the PIC, age 46, is Belgian. The company was going to give more details today. There were three other major incidents during the past ten days of which one was an emergency landing in Boucarest (?).
garp is offline  
Old 1st September 2005 | 10:56
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
From: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
The preamble to any MEL I've ever seen includes the option for the commander to refuse the aircraft, regardless of the legality of the release...adviseable to have done your homework before doing so, but nevertheless...an option...hopefully this non-standard configuration requiring additional fuel would have been dealt with prior to takeoff no???
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 1st September 2005 | 10:59
  #25 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
Looking at the CAA MMEL, a single engine or APU equipped generator may be U/S for non-ETOPS flights, provided that all indications on the alternate are normal, all busses can be powered and the faulty item is rectified within three days.

Conjecting wildly, one can see a Captain seeing that if he took the aircraft, the generator wouldn't be replaced within the 3 day interval - and his management feeling otherwise. (Which, just to repeat, doesn't change the fact that the Captain has responsibility to accept or decline the aircraft.)

G



AC Power Supply Note: All indicators and warnings may
be inoperative on a channel
considered inoperative.



Engine Driven Generator
Channels (IDG, GCU, Line
Contractor)


Except for ETOPS operations, one
may be inoperative provided:

(a) APU and APU driven generator
channels are operative and used
throughout the duration of the flight,

(b) All busses can be powered,

(c) Indications and warnings for the
remaining engine, and APU driven
generator channels are operative, and

(d) Repairs or replacements are carried
out within three calendar days.

Note: No further alleviation is given.



APU Driven Generator Channel

Except for ETOPS operations beyond
120 minutes, may be inoperative provided:

(a) The STBY generator is operative, and

(b) Repairs or replacements are carried
out within three calendar days.
(from http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/SRG_ACP_A300-600_REV3A.PDF , page 31)
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 1st September 2005 | 11:39
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: this side of the hill
The company is just out with a statement in which they say that the pilot got sacked because of
a/ unlawful absence during the past months
b/ alcohol intoxication causing delay
garp is offline  
Old 1st September 2005 | 11:46
  #27 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
Assuming that's true, it proves that one shouldn't jump to conclusions!

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 1st September 2005 | 12:27
  #28 (permalink)  

Freight God
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: LS-R54A
Assuming nothing the company should still be banned since (at least in my understanding of the 'informatin' provided) they knew the CPT was intoxicated before they let him take the flight that returned (this now assuming that the company does actually say the truth about the captains intoxication).

The problem now is that should the company try to put some public attention on the CPT (in order to have a more peaceful and quiet time for themselves not to follow procedures ((and I am assuming here too)) ), then they should be not only banned but forced to permanently end operations with mamagement becoming no-go's for any new start-up bcause they actually first try to ruin a career deliberatly by untruthful statements in order to cover up...

Now since that again is speculation, what we really would need is the complete story.
Hunter58 is offline  
Old 1st September 2005 | 12:59
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: where I shouldn’t be
garp

lets hope for the management of that outfit that their statement is true and not "misinterpreted" as PIC was down with the flue (absence) and had taken Vicks MediNight (alcohol).

Either which way, if the skipper was in violation of the charges brought up against him, them why was he allowed to take the flight after the fact and even allowed to ferry to Djerba?

So the airline, their management, is in fact a hazard to the sky. Either for their action of putting revenue over safety or for letting intoxicated crews fly the big heavy stuff.
N380UA is offline  
Old 2nd September 2005 | 08:43
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Two hundred baro
Airline denies pilot's statement on dismissal
Thu 01/09/05 - The Turkish charter flight company, Fly Air, is not pleased with Peter Thys's unfair dismissal claim. According to Fly Air, the true reasons for the pilot's sacking are long-term absence and alcohol abuse.

Shortly after taking off from Paris last week, Thys noticed a technical problem and returned to the runway for an emergency repair. Later the pilot was informed by Fly Air that he was sacked for breach of company policy.

Yesterday Thys claimed that he had been dismissed for following standard safety procedure.

Today the airline company replied in a communiqué saying that the Paris incident had nothing to do with the pilot's sacking. Fly Air stated that his long-term absence and a flight's delay because of alcohol abuse are the true reasons.

Fly Air's ground operations manager in Brussels claimed on Wednesday that Thys's dismissal came as a result of personal problems between the pilot and the company.
CAT1 is offline  
Old 2nd September 2005 | 09:06
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: is a point of view
Thumbs down Hmmm let me speculate with these events..

France are moving towards dissmissing airlines who have bad maintanence reputations...

Fly Air flight returns to france with tech problem... (no need to speculate if this is wrong or right)

Airline fears loss of face... and beiing put on the black list...

So to send message to pilots; sacks expendable contract pilot (whom has been giving them "problems" anyway, because he actualy follows the procedures to the letter, which is not flexible enough in their eyes)...

then Fly Air's worst nightmare comes to life... it gets picked up by the news media....

Fly Air fabricate charges (which they can not hold up) to save their reputation, knowing the public does not like to hear about drunken pilots...

Hmmm maybe not so far fetched???

Pointer
Pointer is offline  
Old 2nd September 2005 | 10:37
  #32 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
Many of us have on occasion been rude about aviation journalism here from time to time.

Here would be a good opportunity for an aviation journalist to prove both their aviation, and journalistic credentials. There's a story here, and the facts are far from clearcut.


Question is, will anybody rise to the challenge?

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 2nd September 2005 | 15:10
  #33 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: here and there
The aircraft was was an A300B2 (no center tanks).
I also hear that he was bound to ORY when the genny quit.

So there you are. Leave baggage to get all the fuel you need to fly lower (an apu with a history of shutting down) or ask them to replace a the gen.

Pointer, I believe you hit the nail on his head.
MaxBlow is offline  
Old 2nd September 2005 | 17:29
  #34 (permalink)  
The Cooler King
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 30
From: Europe
N380UA......

Well pointed out.

Thoughts go out to the pilot if he's being scapegoated.
Farrell is offline  
Old 3rd September 2005 | 10:26
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
From: UK
Given that most of what we read in the press and see/hear on the media about our profession is complete and utter b0££0ck$ - (we make that point often enough on these fora!) - I would suggest that there is a better than 50% chance that:

a: we only have about 2% of the story
and
b: that 2% is probably not accurate!!!!
FlapsOne is offline  
Old 3rd September 2005 | 11:47
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: England
Don't know all the facts but this seems to be a case of pressurising pilots into taking risks.

Best wishes to the pilot concerned.
alterego is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.