Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Are BA for real?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Are BA for real?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Aug 2005, 14:26
  #41 (permalink)  
Junior trash
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Should in the FCO's means you better have a damn good reason not to. For example: [a wheels up/partial gear landing] SHOULD always be made on the paved surface rather than on grass or other soft surface.

You'd want a pretty good reason lined up for that one
Hotel Mode is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2005, 15:11
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: uk
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not the should/must argument again
normal_nigel is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2005, 10:58
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've not heard anything about any untowards consequences for the pax, so well done that Capt. good decision.
Complex_Type is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2005, 16:27
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: the state of denial
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PAXboy raises the question of the potential liability of a carrier for medical expenses.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any expense that the passenger would incur in treatment in the US would have to borne by BA - not the individual.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How so? Do you have details of the insurance arrangements for this patient and that of BA?
In general, the Warsaw system would apply. By the "Warsaw system" I mean the Warsaw Convention and its numerous amendments.

Article 17 of the Convention (as amended by the Guatemala City Protocol) states that:
1. The carrier is liable for damage sustained in case of death or
personal injury of a passenger upon condition only that the event which
caused the death or injury took place on board the aircraft or in the course
of any of the operations of embarking or disembarking. However, the
carrier is not liable if the death or injury resulted solely from the state of
health of the passenger.


So it is entirely possible that a carrier would have to bear the costs of treatment of the kind of injury that apparrently took place in this case.
Cosmo is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2005, 16:43
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Northumberland N55 W02
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
>So it is entirely possible that a carrier would have to bear the costs of treatment of the kind of injury that apparrently took place in this case.

So it was in BA's financial interest to continue to the UK . . .
GrahamCurry is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2005, 17:12
  #46 (permalink)  
Junior trash
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What part of we call medlink they advise a course of action dont you understand? BA wont even normally be aware we've called Medlink until a course of action has been decided upon, and they certainly wouldnt interfere with any decision. Theres not a conspiricy everywhere.
Hotel Mode is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2005, 17:13
  #47 (permalink)  
Ohcirrej
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would give up people.

Our thread starter doesn't seem to want to play anymore.
Jerricho is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2005, 18:11
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: ask gavin
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well traveling back from SIN i developed renal colic (Kidney stones). I have never been in so much pain ever! Im cabin crew and i know that kidney stones is a diversionary medical complaint, its in bold: Diversion and seek medical help on arrival.

Well the crew and nurse that was onboard (thank f**k) explained the best they could, i was away with the fairies, that the nearest airport they would divert to was Mumbai. Now im sure they have very good medical care, but there was no way on Gods Earth that i was going to be left on my own far from home, in a county i know very little about, dont speak the lingo etc to have medical care. And i knew that with Kidney stones flying home would be out of the question for some time afterward.

The crew, nurse and i all agreed that they would continue to Europe, but if my condition was to get worse (i was not in good shape) they would have no option but to divert.

Now i knew the risk, as did the nurse, but i was the ill one, i was the one they consulted with, and it was my wish to continue the 12 hours to Europe. Should we be critising the airline and crew of the airline i flew with?

God knows how but we made it to Europe, and all i can say is thank you to the crew/airline and nurse that we did not divert. That was my wish and they carried it out. Im sure the BA crew consulted with the pax/crew with their ankle.

And so they jumped the queue, landed before anyone else, wether they should or shouldnt have declared an emergency, they still had someone onboard who was injured. And if that ment they got on the ground earlier and got the person seen to quicker then great. Perhaps it was a little bit of compassion that we so lack these days.
EasyBaby is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2005, 21:48
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Glandland
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why are you all bothering with this numpty. He sounds like an emi rat wide body driver and if so obviously the holes in his mickey mouse licence validation and real experience of the industry are starting to show thru. All shiney jet and no substance.

Beernice, atpl you may have but your ignorance of the pretty common medilink type services indicates that you are indeed ignorant. Ignorant of the industry norms that is. Something you wouldnt be if you had any real exposure to it.

By comparison i called medical assistance recently at a spanish airport while still on stand. Got a bollocking for not calling medilink and for using the local quack (and boy he was) as we lost our liability cover and after care from medilink. Great action by the crew, instinctive by me , bollockings all round and the pax moaned that we had left him behind. Thats because a first epi fit is normal where he comes from...you cant win.
Bart O'Lynn is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.