Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Emirates 128 engine failure and diversion

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Emirates 128 engine failure and diversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Jul 2005, 21:00
  #1 (permalink)  
LGB
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: -
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Emirates 128 engine failure and diversion

Heard over Turkey this evening Emirates 128 calling pan pan twice (before ATC woke up), then declaring emergency because of eng fail, asking for diversion.

Where did they get to eventually, the first suggestion by ATC was apparently a military airfield with no fuel avbl? Think that was LTCE/ERZ Erzurum.

I hope all went well for them, and their pax get to their destination soon.

Last edited by LGB; 6th Jul 2005 at 21:24.
LGB is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2005, 21:31
  #2 (permalink)  
MR8
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Building Site
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They went into Trabzon, north Turkey. EK16 (LGW - DXB) diverted also into Trabzon a bit later to get the passengers from EK128 (VIE-DXB). If it was 'just' an engine failure, and a PAN situation, not a MAYDAY, wonder why they didn't go to a more international airfield like Ankara or Istanbul...

MR8
MR8 is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2005, 21:53
  #3 (permalink)  
LGB
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: -
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They started with a PAN, but as I wrote, when ATC (finally) replied, they did declare an emergency. Why not, on a twin, I would have done the same.

Good to hear they got to a reasonable place, Trabzon is OK, a Turkish domestic holiday destination, with reasonable facilities, better than the other one they first suggested I guess.
LGB is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2005, 22:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London & Edinburgh
Age: 38
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alls well that ends well.

Jordan
Jordan D is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2005, 23:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like a good job done. " Land at the nearest suitable airfield" as I said before.... job done.
Freeway is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2005, 10:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Dubai
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if its just engin failure (not fire), it would be better to divert to a bigger airport.
buttom line.. its the Capt to decide, not the SMNC!!
my props to the pilots for the good job.


goin back to my holiday
Emirates Airline is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2005, 12:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blingland
Age: 56
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bottom line, Emirates Airline you weren't there, so shut up. Ankara is a hell hole surrounded by large mountains. On 1 engine, you would have "issues with S/E perf.
Going forwards towards Iran on one engine, you would be a loony. Trabzon is a good airport, on the Black Sea coast a good compromise. I engine you get it on the ground, ECAM says in Amber LAND ASAP if one engine is shutdown.

Well done to the crew Good job done!

SyB
Sheikh Your Bootie is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2005, 15:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Say again, LGB...... I was fast asleep........

I dare say that you were not sitting beside the ATCO.
Unable Due Traffic is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2005, 21:38
  #9 (permalink)  
LGB
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: -
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unable Due Traffic ,

You are most correct, I was not 'next to ATC'. I was somewhere in same sector as aforementioned, listening in to that particular ATC, and from what I gathered afterwards, all points go to Emirates for their handling, from what I could see. Well done!

I would, though, appreciate that ATC does give more priority to aircraft making a call starting with 'Mayday, Mayday" than was given on this day, though not being next to ATC, I do not know the reason for the initial delay on helping this crew out. They were not on fire nor out of fuel, but still, on a twin with a donkey shut down, I would also have called an emergency myself. On a lazy frequency I appreciate that ATCOS are not equally concentrated at all times due to lack of traffic, so who am I to guess at what was the reason for the delay?
LGB is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2005, 21:42
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Over The Hills And Far Away
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

I am confused now! Did you not say they started out with a Pan Pan?
Techman is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2005, 21:53
  #11 (permalink)  
LGB
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: -
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, this is what I heard (from what I remember):

"Pan Pan, Pan Pan, Emirates 128"

(no answer)

"Pan Pan, Pan Pan, Emirates 128"

(after a period that seemed like in the order of 10 seconds)

"Aircraft calling, say again"

"Emirates 128, we have lost an engine, would like to declare an emergency"

(or something very close to that)

A period of pause again, then ATC was calling one or two other aircraft, before getting back to Emirqates 128.

I must admit now, this being some days ago, that whether Emirates stated "Mayday" or "declare an emergency" I will not testify to, but in my view, it is the same.

By the time ATC actually responded, they did declare an emergency instead of pan pan.

And why even bother with a pan pan, everyone knows mayday, not all knows what a 'PANNE' is ... you can always cancel a mayday if not needed anymore.

I hope this clarifies it.
LGB is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2005, 21:58
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Over The Hills And Far Away
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

You are right about the Pan Pan. It gets nobodys attention.

It would probably have been better to start with Mayday, which is a real attention getter.

I am however impressed that you know the origins of PAN PAN..
Techman is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2005, 08:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Afghanistan
Age: 64
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
May Day = M'aidez
Panne = broken down (sort of)

Both French origin
mtogw is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2005, 21:19
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bottom line: Pan Pan = NO IMMEDIATE ASSISTANCE REQUIRED
Mayday Mayday = Immediate assistance required.

Crew know their aircraft and their situation. It was their decision and hence all ended well.

Jac
Jacamar is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2005, 20:48
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys...
I think the Emirates crew did a very good job and made good decision, with the PAN PAN call and airport they chose.
We were not on board and can't justice.
I am a FO on a 767 doing charters... Pushing law, airplane and crew to the max and think that the only persons who can justice about the situation is the crew theirselves.

Happy landings!
Cheers

SKYLARK3
Skylark3 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.