Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Hijack tonight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Mar 2005, 21:51
  #1 (permalink)  
niknak
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hijack tonight?

About 2100 tonight I observed a HIJACK squawk enter UK airspace from the south east (about 40nm east of Dover) descending from high level, at around 350kt.

The aircraft continued west bound towards Stansted, descended to FL160 and took up a non standard holding pattern just to the north west of Stansted, maintaing the hijack squawk.

When I left at 2130 it was still in the hold, and I didnt hear anything on the radio between leaving and getting to the pub, although a media blackout wouldnt be unusual.

Anyone know what was going on?
niknak is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2005, 22:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danger

would be interesting to know the end of this story.
ShenziRubani is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2005, 22:35
  #3 (permalink)  


Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orlando, Florida
Age: 68
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the relevant agencies WERE trying to keep it from the media - your message hasn't helped.

A telephone call to one of your work colleagues may have been more constructive. What was the name of that Act again? Something official to do with secrets
Keygrip is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2005, 22:47
  #4 (permalink)  
niknak
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keygrip.

The same information would have been fed to the media long before I posted, in the UK the government can "request" or "impose" a media blackout of sensitive news items, that has nothing to do with the official secrets act to which you allude.
No doubt we'll hear about it in the media in the morning.
niknak is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2005, 02:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
secret is out

Anyone with a nefarious interest would already be listening on the same frequencies anyway. It's hardly a secure communication!
barit1 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2005, 02:49
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard it was an Aeroflot squawking went into LHR still squawking and was boarded by armed police on a remote stand
Chef is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2005, 08:13
  #7 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
PPRuNe Radar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1997
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If Niknak was a NATS employee, then there would have been a breach of employee rules by reporting this ... however, other ATS providers might be a bit more free in what employees are allowed to pass on from their place of work

The same information would have been fed to the media long before I posted,
I wouldn't be so sure .......
PPRuNe Radar is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2005, 08:18
  #8 (permalink)  
PPRuNe Supporter
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Devon, UK
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone with a nefarious interest would already be listening on the same frequencies anyway. It's hardly a secure communication!
Well I think you need a little more than an airband scanner to intercept and decode SSR transmissions.
Tallbloke is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2005, 10:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And not forgetting that it is illegal to use any information that you may hear on a scanner.
Turn It Off is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2005, 14:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: western europe
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And not forgetting that it is illegal to use any information that you may hear on a scanner.
I wish someone had pointed that out at the start of the "infamous" IFSD thread ......
hobie is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2005, 14:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was a tech problem with the a/c
Gonzo is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2005, 19:27
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: auckland, new zealand
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I may have missed some of the meaning of a few of the above posts but wouldn't any hijacker already know there was a hijack going on? Why keep the problem secret?
cribble is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2005, 19:35
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've heard from those working at LHR that SU247 from SVO to LHR, the pilot accidently activated the 'hijack' warning and could not disable it once landed.
Sorry for my basic explanation|!
concorde001 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2005, 19:46
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 163
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And not forgetting that it is illegal to use any information that you may hear on a scanner.
Hardly a concern for anyone with dubious intentions...
paddyboy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.