Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

KAL Cargo Plane Topples Back At Sydney Airport

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

KAL Cargo Plane Topples Back At Sydney Airport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jan 2002, 11:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post KAL Cargo Plane Topples Back At Sydney Airport

<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/0201/09/national/national105.html" target="_blank">Click Here</a>
AAL_Silverbird is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 11:21
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Ooops!!
David Hurst is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 11:26
  #3 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Talking

Someone bonus going down the drain in KAL.....
Jokes can start again
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 11:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 347
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Post

They are not the first.
innuendo is online now  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 12:33
  #5 (permalink)  
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Europe
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

A couple of pictures already uploaded on Airliners dot Net. Search using registration HL7372

It happens eh... <img src="rolleyes.gif" border="0">
QNH1013 is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 12:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: South East UK
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

It's just begging for a caption.
Kalium Chloride is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 12:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: australia
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

How about "ROTATE!"
meloz is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 13:54
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The hairdressers!
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

Ouch, looks rather expensive.
Good to hear nobody was hurt. The car must have been too close to call for a few of the ground-handlers. I wonder if it was a general error, or as is sometimes the case more than meets the eye! Fatigue, duff info!! <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
I've spoken to Loadies who say the MD-11 can be a bit slippery during loading. Obviously.
Cee of Gee is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 14:40
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: ex EGNM, now NZRO
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Apt name above (C of G) - what sort of weight would it take to do that??
Anti Skid On is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 14:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: somewhere in oz
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

more pics on Dunnunda & Godzone
hot 'n' heavy is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 15:34
  #11 (permalink)  
Trash du Blanc
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: KBHM
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

We had it happen with just a couple of medium pallets going back on a MD-11. You have to have the nosegear strapped down or keep a loaded pallet in the front. Luckily the towbar was hooked on and kept the tail from contacting the ground.

The f/o onboard was trying to sleep, and suddenly got vertigo. He opened his eyes, and all he saw out of the windshield was stars!

Taxiing or flying the Mighty Dog empty requires 50,000# of ballast fuel. Any less and you're asking for trouble....
Huck is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 16:49
  #12 (permalink)  
allianceair
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Is this why the MD-11 is a rather unstable aircraft to fly? Is it because of the center of gravity? As a passenger sitting in the back of the MD-11 the control inputs from the pilot were greatly exaggerated as we approached for landing. It was rather unsettling.
 
Old 9th Jan 2002, 16:51
  #13 (permalink)  
allianceair
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Caption for the Photo:

VIAGRA ON BOARD
 
Old 9th Jan 2002, 17:14
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Stansted
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

It happens - but why's it always happening to KAL?!?!
Greg Baddeley is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 17:38
  #15 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

It doesn't just happen to the MD-11. It has happened to DC8s, B747Fs and will hapen again if they don't bother using a sling on the nose LG strut or a tail stand. For once, it doesn't seem to be KAL's fault.
HotDog is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 17:44
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: manchester
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

This can happen quite easily on any cgo/combi aircraft especially if tailjack is not used or nose is not tied down and heavy pallets are being positioned on m/deck.

Not sure about MD11 but I think B747f have some safety device built in the inner hold system when aircraft senses tilt.

Some aircraft such as B747 combi are normally tail heavy due to the 7x M/deck pos at rear, not sure about MD11.
skymarshal 1 is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 17:49
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The scouse end of the M62
Age: 48
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Check out Airliners.net, scroll to the accident section to see a lot more unfortunates <img src="frown.gif" border="0">
Danza is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 18:07
  #18 (permalink)  
747FOCAL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Well if the flight crew had been big fat Europeans and not 90 lbs Koreans this probably wouldn't have happened. <img src="rolleyes.gif" border="0">

[ 09 January 2002: Message edited by: 747FOCAL ]</p>
 
Old 9th Jan 2002, 18:15
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Among the clouds
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

"Look, if you try really hard, you can get the nose higher than that 747".
bow5 is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2002, 18:52
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The hairdressers!
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

As a lot of operators, our A300 and other freighters don't use tail-stands. All C of G movements during loading are calculated by the Loadmaster. (must keep an eye on it still!)
A good feature of our types is that when empty, they sit at the foward edge of trim. I imagine that due to the tail mounted engine, the MD-11 doesn't! How far in the envelope are they guys?
I was told that when they are positioned by tug, a ballast pallet in the foward position is required. Is the MD-11 certified for a weight bearing tail-stand?
Some aircraft have them, but only to be used as a visual reference. Result= BIG HOLE!
Cee of Gee is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.