Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

China Airlines taxi-way take-off!

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

China Airlines taxi-way take-off!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Feb 2002, 03:36
  #61 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,446
Received 1,603 Likes on 735 Posts
Post

Hun, really?

<a href="http://www.crashdatabase.com/cgi-bin2/webdata_crashdatabase.cgi?cgifunction=Search&Aircraft=Tupole v" target="_blank">http://www.crashdatabase.com/cgi-bin2/webdata_crashdatabase.cgi?cgifunction=Search&Aircraft=Tupole v</a>

Date: 06/06/1994. .Location: Xi'an, China. .Airline: China Northwest Airlines. .Aircraft: Tupolev TU-154M. .Registration: B-2610. .Fatalities/No. Aboard: 160:160. .Details: The plane broke-up in flight 10 minutes after taking off. Auto-pilot induced oscillations caused the aircraft to shake violently. The autopilot yaw-channel was accidentally connected to the bank control and the bank-channel to the yaw controls.

[ 02 February 2002: Message edited by: ORAC ]</p>
ORAC is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2002, 05:44
  #62 (permalink)  

SkyGod
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Palm Coast, Florida, USA
Age: 67
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 1 Post
Post

Think I'll stay away from them Tupolevs.. .After reading all the accident reports on this page, and reflecting on the former Aeroflot's bad accident record:

If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going.
TowerDog is online now  
Old 3rd Feb 2002, 07:04
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Denver, Co. usa
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

Ive been told by people who flew the 154B that the generators could not be paralleled and Gen 1 supplied power to fuel pumps on left wing and Gen 3 powered pumps in right wing. If you lost a Gen you lost the fuel in that wing.

The other thing that impressed me was that the passengers did not have oxygen. Im not too sure this a bad idea. A lot of people have died because that system was on an airplane........... Discussion, Ladies and Gentlemen ?????
polzin is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2002, 11:13
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: western europe
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

polzin ... whats the Oxygen thing all about? ...... cheers ...hobie
hobie is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2002, 20:17
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: In da north country
Age: 62
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hobie,

I think Polzin is making a cry for help!, you see, he lives in some very rarefied air out west and doesn't always think straight due to lack of oxygen. So, being the nice guy you are, be gentle with the old guy!
Willit Run is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2002, 01:02
  #66 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Individual oxygens masks are not mandatory ( or were not at the time the Tu154 was certified ) The SE210 ( Caravelle to the youngsters) also did not have individual O2 masks. The procedure in case decompression was to dive like a madman to 14.000 Ft. A couple of bottles with ONE mask each were avail to the FAs to give to the weak pax.... .I guess the same goes for the Tu 154 and probably a lot of other oldies...
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2003, 15:34
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: US
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post NTSB releases final report

NTSB final report
Check 6 is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2003, 16:49
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: ex EGNM, now NZRO
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the full report

Which is at the bottom of the link above

The aircraft operating manual for the Airbus did not contain a checklist requirement for the crew to verbalize and verify the runway in use before takeoff.

The aircraft operating manual for China Airlines Boeing 747-200 airplane fleet, under Normal Procedures, Taxi and Takeoff, has a section that reviews taxi routes, and the runway for departure. The procedure states, in part: "1. Before enter the runway: …To corroborate the following required visual reference is established: …the designation of the takeoff runway. 2. After enter the runway: …Make sure active runway marking are being checked as follows: threshold marking; runway designation marking by calling out the runway number; verify runway in use by localizer bearing or GPS coordinates; runway centerline marking; runway touchdown zone markings and fixed distance markings; runway lighting systems are as illuminated as expected.
Without wishing to spark the usual Airbus-v-Boeing fisticuffs, why the hell would the NTSB wish to labour the point above. Are they saying 'Good old Boeing, bad boy Airbus'?
Anti Skid On is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.