Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Gimme, gimme - I'm a BA pilot!

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Gimme, gimme - I'm a BA pilot!

Old 10th Aug 2001, 22:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Gimme, gimme - I'm a BA pilot!

Have you seen the letter from one 777 pilot in the BA news this week? He is suggesting that, as there may have been some mainline input into the GO start-up some years ago, BA staff should have some benefit in cash or kind when GO float on the market.

This unbelievable thirst for other peopleís benefits is just typical of the mercenary attitude of BA pilots. As if they didnít have enough already working for one of the best-paid airlines in Europe. I was there and I know that BA were allowed minimal input into the launch of GO, and this pilot himself certainly did nothing at all, nor did it cost him anything. Where do these people come from and why do they think that the rest of the world should pay them homage and royalties?

Beyond beliefÖsad but true, read his letter for yourself!

[ 10 August 2001: Message edited by: Sick Squid ]
Bourbon-on-the-rocks is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2001, 22:13
  #2 (permalink)  
The Guvnor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

I certainly don't think that everyone in BA should get a drink out of Go simply because Go was a BA operation. However, on the other hand, all of the BA shareholders will be getting a little extra thanks to the 'extraordinaries' that the sale has added to BA's bottom line.

Of course, by the time the financial year end rolls round, BA will doubtless have lost it all!
 
Old 10th Aug 2001, 22:22
  #3 (permalink)  
Lee Dingedge
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I saw that letter, Bourbon. What's that B777 chappie on? £100,000+ at the end of the day and he begrudges secretaries and ticketers a share of the GO launch. They can only think of themselves, those sort of people. Still, I expect his wife loves him - bringing home all that dosh.
 
Old 10th Aug 2001, 22:39
  #4 (permalink)  

Controversial, moi?
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Bourbon-whatever. I haven't read the letter but just because this pilot chooses to express a view, which if your synopsis is to be believed, most BA pilots would think off as being quite ludicrous hardly justifies you referring to me or my 4000 colleagues as 'mercenary BA pilots'.

If what you say is correct then by all means attack the writer but a broad, unfair and, in the main, untrue sweeping generalisation does not add to your credibility or strength of argument.

Lee Dingedge

See above. The writer may or may not be on £100,000 I do not know anymore than you do. I have been in the company 13 years and had a command for the last three. I fly 757 and 767s and can assure you I make no where near that figure by a large margin.

I see you have an interest in motorcycles, I am sure that you would not expect me to assume you are a long haired yob just because a very few motorcyclists are.

[ 10 August 2001: Message edited by: M.Mouse ]

I removed the name from the original MM, don't think it is relevant to the argument; this edit is for consistency. £6

[ 10 August 2001: Message edited by: Sick Squid ]
M.Mouse is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2001, 23:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

Bourbon & Lee,

Haven't read the letter yet so can't comment on this individuals attitude. (The firelighter only publishes flight-crews letters if it will embarrass them in some way.)

I do, however, object to your attitudes to the rest of us in BA. You both have pretty broad brushes you are painting with. Personally, I don't give a monkeys about money from the sale of GO - the Guvnor got it right on this one!

ATB,

Underdog
Underdog is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2001, 23:37
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thanks for biting M.Mouse!

"If what you say is correct then by all means attack the writer but a broad, unfair and, in the main, untrue sweeping generalisation does not add to your credibility or strength of argument"

Well, I wasn't arguing or even after credibility or strength of argument. If I was, I don't think I would be writing on an anonymous rumour forum!!

In the main, as you say, it probably is a sweeping comment but all the BA pilots I know (do you want my staff number?) talk incessantly about what a particular bid line or trip is worth and how much the Americans get for the same job. Where I came from, who you are flying with and where you were going were always the main points of interest. Grateful for the money, of course, but never talked about it.

Just read the article - don't take my word for it.
Bourbon-on-the-rocks is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2001, 23:45
  #7 (permalink)  
Lee Dingedge
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Hey Mister Mouse - I fly 757/767, command for 8 years and make just a fraction over the 100G after allowances and before tax. You've made my day if I get more than a BA equivalent!!!
 
Old 10th Aug 2001, 23:50
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Englands newest City
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

if a company disposes of an asset what right does that give an employee to a share of that asset. I would suggest none at all. The company had the risk at start up and because they dispose of it does not mean that everyone can then stick there nose into the trough and get some of it. How would that person feel if they had a handy man and when the house went up for sale he wanted a share. after all he is just an employee

[ 12 August 2001: Message edited by: rover2701 ]
rover2701 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2001, 00:49
  #9 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I think flight crew morale would be considerably boosted at BA if anyone was earning £100k .....
Human Factor is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2001, 01:36
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I think a lot of peoples morale at BA would be boosted if they were earning a small part of 100K. The airline is much much larger than the flight crew I just hope after the down trodden pilots have earned their 15% pay rise there is is enough left in the pot for the rest of us to maybe keep our heads above water.
28115 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2001, 02:24
  #11 (permalink)  

Controversial, moi?
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

28115

There is a great deal of nonsense talked about BA pilots pay. I don't know where you get your figure of 15% from but no figure has been decided upon by our representatives yet.

What has been done is a great deal of research and should you care to approach a pilot with an open mind and ask for the facts so far established I am sure that he/she would be happy to share the information with you.

I do not presume to know what I am talking about when other employees pay is being negotiated and frankly what they achieve is between them and their management. Why do so many not directly involved feel they have the knowledge to comment sensibly on mine when they really can have no idea of the reality?

Out of interest which area do you work in?
M.Mouse is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2001, 12:56
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: LHR
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Would it be fair to say that setting up GO was a disaster for BA?
It achieved the following,
  • £25m lost investment each year PLUS inevitable start-up losses incurred.
  • Retrospectively, they have built a strong competitor for budget business travellers, city breakers and even independently minded tourists.
  • It consolidated Stelios's 'victim of BA' image which plays a strong part in a travellers choice when purchasing their ticket.
  • It was a missed opportunity for BA pilots to work out of another base (The option was never even discussed)

The fact that it was a pilot who had the balls to accuse his bosses of the monumental fcuk up, in its own document of propoganda, "BA News", was something to be proud of. Unfortunately, the individual, missed the opportunity to put this feeling across by tarnishing it with what I believed to be a poorly worded letter.

However, if they can make such mistakes (and its effect can be felt by the employees through poor share performance and LACK of profit share for so many years) he did have a right to be annoyed.

Perhaps Bourbon and Lee Dingedge feel comfortable in their unquestioning existence, doing their impression of mushrooms in their strange Waterside open plan offices, but WE as pilots live in a questioning environment. It makes us safer by being cynical. If that cynicism includes our bosses then so be it. Don't be a kiss ass, Bourbon, it doesn't 'Suit' you.

Have you improved your productivity by 25% in the last 5 years, gents?
Magnus Picus is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2001, 15:00
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Silly Cone Valley
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

There was probably nothing wrong behind the idea of GO, it’s just that it was the wrong thing for BA to get involved in. Why on Earth would we want to get into competition with ourselves, unless of course it was an attempt by the man who shall forever associated with blunder and pestilence to prove some point over shorthaul costs.

The fact is that both GO and EuroGatwick were losing £100m a year whilst management were trying to tell us what a disaster EG was and how those losses were unsustainable. In addition, I heard from the horses mouth a frank admission that if GO had had to operate out of Heathrow, then they could barely have matched the costbase of LHR Shorthaul. So much for BA being soooh expensive!

The truth is that it was a stunt arranged by Ailing Bob, and his inability to understand that there is more than one market for shorthaul travel in Europe. There are those who wish to ‘go’ on the cheap with a no bells and whistles service from a regional airport – doesn’t matter where to doesn’t matter where. Then there is the serious business traveller who needs a direct service, connected to a major hub, with a reliable robust service at a sensible time, to another major terminal convenient for his/her needs. For such a service a premium is acceptable, and they have no problem paying it.

If you don’t accept this argument then perhaps you wouldn’t mind driving a Trabant. There is room in this business for Skoda’s and BMW’s and the skilful Chief Executive knows where his company is headed.

Roobarb is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2001, 16:19
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Quote "greedy BA pilots" - I would like to state, most emphatically, that I resemble that remark, Bourbon.
Pete Otube is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2001, 16:39
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hard as it is for Magnus Picus to grasp, there are pilots who believe they receive a fair wage. In purely flying terms, I am well qualified and I think I am well paid for my trouble. I have a comfortable house, two holidays a year and a new car every three years. My kid goes to private school and we keep warm in winter.

I do not make the 100K mentioned above, but I suspect like most BA pilots, I’m not far off it. Am I therefore a “suit” or a “mushroom” because I’m content and enjoy my work? What a very, very small world you live in, Picus - I expect you’re the most important person in it?
Bourbon-on-the-rocks is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2001, 18:37
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

Bourbon, Don't bad mouth guys pushing for the best deal they can get. Investment in GO reduced profits that year, therefore no profit share that year for any BA staff. Why shouldn't all BA staff benifit from the investment of their profit share that wasn't?

Your self-effacing attitude does nothing for your colleagues who try to maintain and improve our lot. Get some ATTITUDE!

If you don't work for BA I suggest you keep your nose OUT!

kippa is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2001, 19:20
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: England
Posts: 14,562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Is it not the case that BA invested a one off £25million to start Go after which it was totally self sustaining and then 3 years later they sold it for £110million?

Looks like a nice return to me. I may be wrong.

WWW
Wee Weasley Welshman is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2001, 21:09
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Self-effacing, Chatham? On the contrary, I thought I sounded rather smug and self-satisfied !!
Bourbon-on-the-rocks is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2001, 21:19
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Bourbon-on-the-Rocks,

"One of the best-paid airlines in Europe"

Myself and around 3,500 of my colleagues would love to see what information you have based that extraodinary statement on.

I beg you - spill the beans and enlighten us all.......................
Positive Climb is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2001, 21:26
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

Sorry Burbon you failed... Self-effacing and whinging was the result.

kippa is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.