Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

777-300ER delivery problem?

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

777-300ER delivery problem?

Old 3rd Jun 2004, 08:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 22
Unhappy 777-300ER delivery problem?

I was talking to an ATC friend who seemed to think that the latest 777-300ER to Air France had to divert on its delivery flight.

He didn't have any details although thought that it was engine related.
always-pending is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 10:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: cloud 9
Posts: 6
I heard that the engine had to be shut down on the delivery flight. The aircraft continued to CDG and had an uneventful landing.

Nothing of particular interest for this forum.
nosedive00 is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 10:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: western europe
Posts: 1,367
from an engineering point of view it would be interesting to know why it had to be shut down so if you do find out the reason AP please post

cheers ....
hobie is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 10:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 43
nosedive00 perhaps the "Bus" drivers would be interested!
bombshell is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 12:21
  #5 (permalink)  

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: EGGW
Posts: 838
It was an IFSD due to oil loss caused by I'm led to believe, a collapsed scavenge tube.
gas path is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 12:42
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 22
Gas Path, You don't think that the oil scav tube is the same reason why the first aircraft has been on watch since delivery?
always-pending is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 13:48
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skagness on the beach
Posts: 882
If only I could tell.........
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 14:09
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 22
747Focal, I thought you were always eager to share your pearls of wisdom!
always-pending is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 14:16
  #9 (permalink)  

OLD RED DAMASK
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire born. In Cebu now
Age: 66
Posts: 368
747Focal is VERY quiet this time,if it had been an Airbus...Well that's a different story.
Shame Boeing have put all their eggs in one basket by exclusive use of GE90's on the 300ER version!
lasernigel is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 14:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skagness on the beach
Posts: 882
That whole airplane has problems that can't be fixed. You pilots make sure and bring your sick bags when you fly her.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 15:17
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 22
747Focal.

If its that poor why don't you withdraw it from the market and recommend operators switch to the bus!

Or how about re-engining

It could save any further embarrasment
always-pending is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 15:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skagness on the beach
Posts: 882
The problems I was refering to have nothing to do with the engines.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 15:51
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: western europe
Posts: 1,367
sounds like 747 is talking about this particular airframe? ......
hobie is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 16:02
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 191
I think Focal is on about a certain "feeling" the 773 gives you, esp when sat at the back.
BigHitDH is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 20:25
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 6,450
It's alright, Harry Stonecipher at Boeing has "done a deal" with GE, so that keeps everything nice and cosy on the ER, whether it works or not.

I just think Harry is getting his own back on Boeing from all the days he spent at McDD being trounced by them !
WHBM is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 20:31
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skagness on the beach
Posts: 882
Well when all 777-300ER pilots nickname her "galloping gearny" don't say I did not tell you so.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 20:59
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,572
What do you want to bet, when any 'problems' are fixed, it will become very successful for Boeing, much like the B747 was, oh so many years ago.
With that aircraft, I was kept busy for a year delivering various bits in a Skyvan to Seattle...and the 747 swept all others aside.
Airboos, phooey...they can't even get the FD to give correct pitch indications for takeoff, at least on the EK machines...
411A is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 22:54
  #18 (permalink)  

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: EGGW
Posts: 838
Question

Ho Hum! sliding down that slippery slope of Bus versus Boeing again!
I wonder what Mr Boeing will do when BA asks for 15 777-300ER aircraft (plus options!) but not with that powerplant?

Last edited by gas path; 3rd Jun 2004 at 23:21.
gas path is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2004, 01:47
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skagness on the beach
Posts: 882
411A, You got years of experience on me, but on this one I have intimate knowledge. It can't be fixed, not easily without new wings.

If you get to fly one I was not kidding about the sick bags for the pilots.

and for those in the back.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2004, 03:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 75
Question

This is an interesting line of discussion,


1. I would have thought that airframe issues such as (what I think) is being described here would have been sorted at design stage in a wind tunnel?

2. If there is "unusual motion" that causes nausia for the pilots, does that not represent a safety risk?


Invictus

(I am not a pilot).
Invictus is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.