Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

777-300ER delivery problem?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

777-300ER delivery problem?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd June 2004 | 08:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Plymouth
Unhappy 777-300ER delivery problem?

I was talking to an ATC friend who seemed to think that the latest 777-300ER to Air France had to divert on its delivery flight.

He didn't have any details although thought that it was engine related.
always-pending is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 10:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: cloud 9
I heard that the engine had to be shut down on the delivery flight. The aircraft continued to CDG and had an uneventful landing.

Nothing of particular interest for this forum.
nosedive00 is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 10:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
From: western europe
from an engineering point of view it would be interesting to know why it had to be shut down so if you do find out the reason AP please post

cheers ....
hobie is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 10:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Australia
nosedive00 perhaps the "Bus" drivers would be interested!
bombshell is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 12:21
  #5 (permalink)  

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
From: EGGW
It was an IFSD due to oil loss caused by I'm led to believe, a collapsed scavenge tube.
gas path is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 12:42
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Plymouth
Gas Path, You don't think that the oil scav tube is the same reason why the first aircraft has been on watch since delivery?
always-pending is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 13:48
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: Skagness on the beach
If only I could tell.........
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 14:09
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Plymouth
747Focal, I thought you were always eager to share your pearls of wisdom!
always-pending is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 14:16
  #9 (permalink)  

OLD RED DAMASK
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire born. In Cebu now
747Focal is VERY quiet this time,if it had been an Airbus...Well that's a different story.
Shame Boeing have put all their eggs in one basket by exclusive use of GE90's on the 300ER version!
lasernigel is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 14:25
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: Skagness on the beach
That whole airplane has problems that can't be fixed. You pilots make sure and bring your sick bags when you fly her.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 15:17
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Plymouth
747Focal.

If its that poor why don't you withdraw it from the market and recommend operators switch to the bus!

Or how about re-engining

It could save any further embarrasment
always-pending is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 15:44
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: Skagness on the beach
The problems I was refering to have nothing to do with the engines.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 15:51
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
From: western europe
sounds like 747 is talking about this particular airframe? ......
hobie is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 16:02
  #14 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Cheshire
I think Focal is on about a certain "feeling" the 773 gives you, esp when sat at the back.
BigHitDH is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 20:25
  #15 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 8,208
Likes: 351
From: London UK
It's alright, Harry Stonecipher at Boeing has "done a deal" with GE, so that keeps everything nice and cosy on the ER, whether it works or not.

I just think Harry is getting his own back on Boeing from all the days he spent at McDD being trounced by them !
WHBM is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 20:31
  #16 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: Skagness on the beach
Well when all 777-300ER pilots nickname her "galloping gearny" don't say I did not tell you so.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 20:59
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
What do you want to bet, when any 'problems' are fixed, it will become very successful for Boeing, much like the B747 was, oh so many years ago.
With that aircraft, I was kept busy for a year delivering various bits in a Skyvan to Seattle...and the 747 swept all others aside.
Airboos, phooey...they can't even get the FD to give correct pitch indications for takeoff, at least on the EK machines...
411A is offline  
Old 3rd June 2004 | 22:54
  #18 (permalink)  

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
From: EGGW
Question

Ho Hum! sliding down that slippery slope of Bus versus Boeing again!
I wonder what Mr Boeing will do when BA asks for 15 777-300ER aircraft (plus options!) but not with that powerplant?

Last edited by gas path; 3rd June 2004 at 23:21.
gas path is offline  
Old 4th June 2004 | 01:47
  #19 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: Skagness on the beach
411A, You got years of experience on me, but on this one I have intimate knowledge. It can't be fixed, not easily without new wings.

If you get to fly one I was not kidding about the sick bags for the pilots.

and for those in the back.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 4th June 2004 | 03:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Dubai, UAE
Question

This is an interesting line of discussion,


1. I would have thought that airframe issues such as (what I think) is being described here would have been sorted at design stage in a wind tunnel?

2. If there is "unusual motion" that causes nausia for the pilots, does that not represent a safety risk?


Invictus

(I am not a pilot).
Invictus is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.