Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Overnight at the Hotel 747-400

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Overnight at the Hotel 747-400

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Feb 2004, 19:32
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 898
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
I can imagine this (perhaps) at some sort of God-forsaken mid-ocean diversion (Narssuasaq, say) - but at LHR? Hardly a shortage of facilities of any kind, and with the Press just a local rate phone call and 20 minutes down the M4 away?
steamchicken is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2004, 02:32
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Sounds like someone's alibi for a husband/boyfreind to me!
Nigel Molesworth is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2004, 02:52
  #23 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Global village
Age: 55
Posts: 3,025
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Arrow

This doesn't ring true.

There must have been some crew onboard to handle an evacuation in case of fire, regardless of country or airline concerned.
Kaptin M is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2004, 11:34
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Are you sure the cabin crew were not in the bunks,perhaps 3
to a bunk!.Also,give us a clue,which terminal?
frangatang is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2004, 16:03
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find this very, very hard to believe. With 400 pax, this would HAVE to get into the media - and with post 9-11 security, they would be all over it.

I call B.S.
Dr. Red is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2004, 18:45
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Germany
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite unbelievable..

There MUST have been at least minimum crew on board. Who will evacuate the A/C in case of fire?
I can´t believe, that this could have happened without major consequences for everybody concerned, from the groundagent to the flight att. to the cockpit crew.

Maybe they weren´t very visible, but i believe they were there..




Greetings from "Old Europe"
Charly is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2004, 20:11
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Above and Below Zero Lat. [Presently at least]
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh Come on Guys /Gals.

I just completed a search on the many many posts of Mr Speed of Sound.

He or she has never ever posted anything technical, specific or intelligent................just a heap of General, Provocative and Sensationalist posts, he/she is winding you up, and your falling for it hook line and sinker!

Drop over to Rotorheads every now and again....we normally sort these dicks out very quickly!

Last edited by Old Man Rotor; 7th Feb 2004 at 20:32.
Old Man Rotor is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2004, 03:14
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a load of 3rd hand hearsay b@llocks!
Classic is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2004, 22:48
  #29 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can we have some more detail?
Yes. Apparently there were some ground ops staff on board during the night. And the air bridge was redeployed to allow smokers into the departure gate (at Terminal 3).

The person who told me this, who was on board that night, has now received a letter of apology from the carrier concerned with an offer of compensation. Not exactly the actions of a blameless company. She has also made a report to the CAA and BAA Heathrow, who both confirmed that hers wasn't the only complaint that had been made.

I assume that Old Man Rotor has a connection with the carrier concerned as he appears to be keen to supress discussion of this topic.

SoS
Speed of Sound is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2004, 23:26
  #30 (permalink)  

ex-Tanker
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Luton Beds UK
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation Urban Legends

Another one for the collection.
Few Cloudy is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2004, 00:02
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: BFS
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If (Big If) This is true then name the carrier. Agree with everyone else though, it would be out in the open by now and I see no reason why pax would be kept on board-especially in the current climate, at LHR.
silverknapper is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2004, 05:37
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: ENGLAND
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is NO way that this can be true. If the aircraft had been on the ground and the passengers had been kept onboard then i'm sure one of them would of put in a call to a newspaper! And what would of happended to the passengers who had friends/family meeting them at the other end - did they stay onboard the aircraft and not bother to tell them?

Pure fiction in my opinion!
elephant is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2004, 10:21
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Above and Below Zero Lat. [Presently at least]
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SOS-----No contact with anyone concerned.

Just can smell a wind up when I see it.

But you have been good so far...and got this thread into its 3rd page...well done.

Wonder why all the lower level journalists have not picked up on this post?

Perhaps they can also smell!!!

But then again, perhaps you are one.
Old Man Rotor is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2004, 10:30
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Blackburn & Kenilworth
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lets face it - stranger things happen at sea! I cant believe most of you lot cant believe it when bigger disasters have happened with aircraft going down from 9/11 to the stewardess surviving an explosion from an aircraft at over 30000 feet in the 70's?
Why do people drive down a street the wrong way and get away with it in some countries? How did Princess Ann stop her dog from getting put down? Nobody died, just a few people got pissed and some more pissed off!!!
dancav is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2004, 12:07
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing adds up on this one. Another point in question - deploying jetbridge to allow smokers into 'departure gate' (I'm guessing you mean the gate room?)- no way would BAA allow this.

SoS, come on, fess up once and for all, what's your agenda?
Bob Upndown is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2004, 20:06
  #36 (permalink)  

Cool as a moosp
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mostly Hong Kong
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've watched this thread since it started and I feel that some of you are missing the point. Just because it should not happen does not mean that it will not.

Phrases like, "no way would BAA allow this" and, "the DFT would never allow this to happen" show that you have not been at Heathrow at 0200. Even the Jobsworths have gone home at that time.

Imagine. Flight crew get off because they are out of hours. One of them vaguely remembers that it is OK to leave it full of passengers as there is "engineering cover" - but he is just the charge hand doing the oils and looks like an engineer.

Cabin crew get antsy half an hour later and tell the last remaining ground agent that they are getting off. "You can't do that!"....

Watch us. Es no mio probleme.

During the night the occasional ground agent might look in to see what's going on or an engineer might appear to do a bit of light maintenance. APU keeps going.

Passengers wander into the gate lounge. Smoke, stretch, get bored, sleep.

Morning shift come on and find aircraft full of people, so do the normal thing and dispatch it. Tracking have meanwhile found a new flight and cabin crew and all goes ahead.

I've seen all of this. Not on the same day and the same flight, but it can all come together on one day. Maybe it did.
moosp is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2004, 20:54
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: BFS
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair point, just cos it shouldn't doesn't mean it doesn't.
However I think this is just pushing it too far IMHO.
silverknapper is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2004, 02:40
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Formerly in Seoul
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Incident happened as described. Airline was Korean. Flight was cancelled at 0230 when it finally became apparent that the flight was not going to depart that night. No hotels or transport available at this time so both the passengers and CREW remained on the aircraft for the rest of the evening.
Won2Go is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2004, 03:09
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly what I was thinking!

What implications does this have for the crew going out of hours?

Does it count when they are on the ground?
BigHitDH is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2004, 04:08
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California USA
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whatever the (regulatory) implications of going over on hours, seems to me they pale in comparison to leaving the pax on the airframe without adult supervision.

So, pax were not alone on the aircraft. My faith is restored. Thankfully it turned out to be good, old-fashioned crew abuse. Bad, but perhaps not unbelievably stupid.

Dave
av8boy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.