Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Damaged Thomas Cook 757 Lyon

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Damaged Thomas Cook 757 Lyon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jan 2004, 21:25
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hang on, I'll check my roster...
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Damaged Thomas Cook 757 Lyon

Saw a TC 757, a super long one, at Lyon t'other day with a pretty nasty looking wing injury. Starboard wing tip just wasn't there! There are lots of light stancions around so i suspect it might be one of them... no other visible damage. Anyone know the details (don't think its posted elsewhere, search is down), I have had some lacklustre marshalling in many places but they are normally OK there.
Spearing Britney is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2004, 01:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a super long one....
That would be a 757-300 if the "standard" is a 757-200.

there are lots of light stancions around so i suspect that it might be one them.....
Ah,...the wing or the light stancion? Bit confusing sentence
alexb757 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2004, 02:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Blackburn
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

Happened on Saturday morning, flight was from LGW. TCX221K.
Psr777 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2004, 03:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The frequency jungle
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
alexb757
No wonder you're confused, because it's supposed to be stanchion

Psr777
Did the aircraft hit a stanchion? Was it Batman's fault for giving crappy vectors?
126,7 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2004, 15:05
  #5 (permalink)  
Dewdrop
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Can't be batman's fault.. PIC is ultimately responsible for the safety of his aircraft.
 
Old 27th Jan 2004, 15:46
  #6 (permalink)  

Controversial, moi?
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
So if a marshaller marshalls me into an object which is out of my sight it is my fault?

Oh! I see.

Having looked at your profile I see that you are well qualified to post your opinion.
M.Mouse is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2004, 16:00
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,965
Received 68 Likes on 26 Posts
Well - I suppose Dewdrop is technically correct BUT......

Many years ago I clipped a de-icing rig with a wingtip despite all clear from a 'qualified wingman' - yes I finished up for tea and a chat with Station Commander but it was the wing man who was
formally cautioned and 'retrained'.
beamer is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2004, 16:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Batman would be to blame otherwise why is he there if not to guide the aircraft on to stand? Having said that we all know the standard of some of these guys so if in doubt stop! If you decide you dont like his instructions and do your own thing and then hit somthing that would be your fault.
kinsman is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2004, 19:28
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: behind the lens
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
M.Mouse - no it is not Batman's fault whatever you think. It's your plane not his. Strange though it may seem. And if a Safedock gets it wrong or you clobber something left in the way - your responsibility.
sharpshot is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2004, 19:36
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Stansted
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What was the co-pilot doing while the aircrafts starboard wing was being put into an obstruction?

Its his side and as a rule I always ask the co-pilot if its clear regardless of instructions from the ground.

Whats his excuse
Say Mach Number is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2004, 20:04
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Co Pilot's excuse is a no brainer............you cannot see the wing tips on 757 from the flight deck..........
fire wall is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2004, 21:43
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
firewall,

Not that I think the skipper is necessarily at fault here, the FO should also be able to judge if they are going to hit something.

If I was the FO I would shout if i thought we werent clear.
expedite_climb is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2004, 22:01
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: europe
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the 757-3 and newer 757-2, you cannot see the wing tips, from the cockpit, but on older 757īs it is possible.

-Same wingspan, so now it is yours to find out why...

pete
pete zahut is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2004, 22:28
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: NE Surrey, UK
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Rear view mirrors no longer standard fit?
Seloco is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2004, 22:35
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: manchester uk
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was there parked up nearby, the wing struck one of the lamp thingys (not gonna go there...!), as the aircraft was coming to a halt on a remote stand. Very busy morning with lots of ski flights etc.
Airport fire services quickly on hand but thankfully not needed.
Hope no one was hurt.
tonyt is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2004, 22:46
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: SE England
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PZ - not visible cos the office is about 12 feet further forward on the 300?
Smoketoomuch is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2004, 23:52
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,965
Received 68 Likes on 26 Posts
Sharpshot

Nice to have the opinion of a spotter on the 'professional pilots'
network.................
beamer is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2004, 18:31
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: n/a
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pete
, but on older 757īs it is possible.
blinking well is not without opening a window even then youd have to unstrap and lean out.

edited to say

I would like to eat humble pie at this point, having now tried various contortions on an early 80's model you can just see the nav light but it is very difficult and you gain no usefull reference from it.
Pete you have my apologies.

Last edited by Daysleeper; 4th Feb 2004 at 19:25.
Daysleeper is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2004, 19:22
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: EGPT/ESVS
Posts: 755
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
blinking well is...just
on older 757s
need to be a contortionist to get head into corner of window and just make out the tip with one eye...done it once or twice

but not while taxiing!

the new ones have the nice rounded plastic fairing over the pillar which makes it impossible
Floppy Link is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2004, 20:15
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys, guys!

Its blinking well irrelevant anyway !

You cant see the wing tips from the -300 flight deck as it is a) newer style b) further forward and the wingspan is the same.
expedite_climb is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.