Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Toronto crash?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Sep 2003, 22:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Swounger
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: New York, NY USA
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Toronto crash?

Did I just hear something on the radio about a crash in Toronto?
Bubbette is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2003, 22:17
  #2 (permalink)  
"The INTRODUCER"
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London
Posts: 437
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Might be this http://toronto.cbc.ca/regional/servl...planes20030912
Algy is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2003, 22:27
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surprised any airline is allowed to fly single engined aircraft.
LTNman is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2003, 23:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada third world country of aviation
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The crash happened in Ontario, but quiete a way away from toronto.
It went down in the bush, north of Thunder bay, not too far from Hudson Bay, if you've ever heard of it.
It was a cessna grand Caravan, around 10 on board, crashed 10 miles from is destination, could be due to bad wx, possibly involving Thunderstorm.
The company is called wasaya, they offer a lot of service in the northern Ontario, yes some of those places have no roads to get to it.
They operate PC12, Caravan, 1900.
Mikey21 is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2003, 03:15
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Montreal
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

Surprised any airline is allowed to fly single engined aircraft.
You shouldn't be surprised there LTNman! Single Engine IFR is a fact of life on this side of the pond. The company in question operates four (now 3) caravans and EIGHT PC12's on both charter and scheduled service over a wide area of northern Ontario and Manitoba.
Before the mud slinging starts, let me say that they (and their competitors, who mostly run the same equipment) are very good companies with excellent safety records considering they conditions in which they work. These aircraft are very safe and yes I have a whole pile of time flying them, including a few hundred on the accident aircraft. I'll take either type IFR with more confidence than a lot of the light twins that are out there.
The community where the crash occurred is a small native community of about 300 people. Most charts call it "Summer Beaver" but the locals call it Nibinamik (Nibin=summer, amik=Beaver) in the Oji-cree which is spoken by all people there.

There is no road in, except for an ice road that lasts for 4-12 weeks in the dead of winter. The only other way in or out is by air from a 3500' gravel lighted runway, or floatplane. The only IFR approach is an approved GPS non-precision. There is no weather reporting of any kind within around 100 miles. The nearest all-season road ends at Pickle Lake, 125sm southwest of the community. These are tough conditions to work in and there are a lot of operations in and out of that and about 20 other communities in the area. The largest aircraft in use are Beech 1900's and HS748's. Prying either of those in and out of those strips takes some real practice, and is likely more dangerous than any risks associated with single engine flying. At least the singles can be slowed down and don't need much runway.
It will be a tragedy much larger than 9/11/01 for those people with seven of their number dead in one crash. Details are still sketchy, but the pilot was a newer commander with a couple thousand hours. A sad day for all concerned, and one that should make us all think about what it is like where aviation is the only link to the outside world. The only way friends and family from the neighbouring communities will be able to go to the funerals will be to fly in (probably on an exact copy of the accident aircraft) right over the crash scene. By mid-day today, that airport will likely have been re-opened so that everything from fuel, to lumber to food can continue to go in to the community.
Elliot Moose is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2003, 06:47
  #6 (permalink)  
GK
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it a 2 crew operation on the Caravan?
GK is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2003, 08:28
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Montreal
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not necessarily. The caravan qualifies for single pilot, single engine IFR in Canada. When I was there, they operated both ways. Freight and fuel ops are almost always single pilot because that second body takes away 180lbs of paying freight out of 3200ish available. With passenger ops, weight isn't generally critical, and the second pilot is used whenever practicable to enhance safety, as well as aid the PIC with things like bag loading, fueling, passenger handling, etc. They used an SOP that worked quite well with both single and multi crew jobs. The accident flight appears to have been operated single pilot.
Elliot Moose is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2003, 11:38
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Elliott;

Excellent post Elliott! Very enlightening to hear first-hand information about that type of operation from your own personal experience.

Serving communities such as this is how aviation started out in Canada!

Apparently some of the Big Jet guys are not familiar with this type of operation. Pity.
wrenchbender is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2003, 21:31
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Montreal
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Video now available at:
cbc news video

Scroll down and click on the video camera icon next to the story "10 die in Northern Ontario Plane crashes"

8 died in the caravan crash. The other two were in a private cessna that crashed about 350miles away.
Elliot Moose is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2003, 22:41
  #10 (permalink)  
STC
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The largest aircraft in use are Beech 1900's and HS748's. Prying either of those in and out of those strips takes some real practice, and is likely more dangerous than any risks associated with single engine flying.

I don't think anyone would argue that a Caravan is much more suited to service this location than any twin engine aircraft. The issue here (as far as I'm concerned) is single engine "IFR operations."

To this day, I refuse to get on a single engine commercial flight that will be done in other than VMC.

In poor weather, Summer Beaver can wait.....
STC is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2003, 23:44
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,559
Received 40 Likes on 19 Posts
Don't know if SE has anything to do with this sad accident yet. I do recall one NW Ontario accident at I believe Sioux Lookout where the two crew twin engine a/c hit the NDB mast.

Excellent tracking skills -- can't say the same for crew judgement.

Can't find any info on the Transport Safety Board web site -- all the CBC reports is that the police are investigating.

Transport Canada has announced that they have appointed a Ministerial Observer to liase with the TSB investigation and will be undertaking a special purpose audit.
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2003, 07:53
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: CY??
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RatherBe: The crash that you speak of actually occurred at Thompson, Manitoba (CYTH). A Medevac aircraft (Swearingen Merlin SW2?) flew into the NDB tower while on approach.
From the pictures in the paper today, it looks as if the 'Van went in almost vertically, as there is no sign of an impact trail in the trees around. A sad day in Summer Beaver, as almost everyone in the community will have lost a relative. My condolences.
North Shore is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2003, 10:05
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,559
Received 40 Likes on 19 Posts
Unhappy



Picture by Sandi Krasowski printed in Thunder Bay
Chronicle - Journal

Chronicle-Journal article

NS -- I agree it looks like a vertical impact. Indicative of elevator or pitch trim failure/malfunction.

How long ago did the Merlin hit the Thompson NDB mast? The YSL accident was some 20 years ago.

Not much to do with single engine.

If anybody is wondering about the bare tree trunks, the impact site site looks like it was burnt over some 5 years ago -- pretty gutsy for the SARtechs to jump into that
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2003, 21:50
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post SE IFR VS Two Crew IFR

Those of you talking about the safety of SE/Single Pilot IFR ops and 2 Crew IFR ops here is the link to the Metro that crashed here in 1994.
http://www.tsb.gc.ca/en/reports/air/...8/a94c0088.asp

From a day to day point of view two crew is much safer just for the fact there is two sets of eyes in the cockpit. But the problem lies if SOPS aren't followed, approachs are poorly briefed and there is a misunderstanding that is not rectified. In those situtations having a communication breakdown is just as bad as if you were flying single pilot with the wrong altitude punched in the altitude select for an approach. Like the A320 in France that selected 3000 FPM instead of 3.0 degree glide path and flew straight into the ground. They had avionics, local weather reports, navaids, ILS, FMC's and another pilot to monitor but yet it still got the best of them. Considering up here in the north there is no weather on the most part, NDB's as the only approache aids and night flying with zero outside reference single pilot operations fair quite well.
My thoughts and prayers go out to the families of this latest accident.
PT6A-34 is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2003, 22:14
  #15 (permalink)  
GK
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was it night IFR when the accident happened?
GK is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2003, 23:00
  #16 (permalink)  
STC
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NS -- I agree it looks like a vertical impact. Indicative of elevator or pitch trim failure/malfunction.

Highly unlikely that it was a mechanical failure in my opinion. My forecast is that the pilot failed to maintain ground clearance due to single pilot operations in a high workload environment. All it would take for the workload to skyrocket is any indication that there was a fault no matter how minor, that would take attention away from flying the airplane.
STC is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2003, 23:52
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Age: 69
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
STC

You should work for TSB. You can find accident causes within 48 hours in the comfort of your armchair. Well done!
604guy is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2003, 00:03
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,559
Received 40 Likes on 19 Posts
A brief review of recent Caravan accidents does show small impact sites in thunderstorm and icing related accidents along with pre-impact integrity of the flight control system. Single pilot may be more important than single engine.

I would not call this a CFIT as there is no debris trail, nor does there seem to be a path of broken down trees (caveat taken for limited information in photo). Caravan CFITs often have survivors with no or minor injuries
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2003, 02:36
  #19 (permalink)  
STC
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
604Guy,

There is absolutely nothing wrong with speculating about the cause of a crash in a public internet forum.

If you don't want to particpate, don't bother, but don't try to accuse those of us that want to discuss it of doing anything wrong.
STC is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2003, 04:58
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Age: 69
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
STC

I have no problems with discussing unfortunate events. Tragically though, a pilot and his or her passengers have died. To start talking about the likely-hood of pilot error without being equipped with the facts is unfair to the pilot, who is not here to defend themselves, and their family. Lets wait for the facts to emerge and then we can discuss and debate the lessons that can be gleaned. Most likely at that point you and I can be in much agreement about said lessons.

Regards,
604guy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.