Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Dinard closed for Ryanair?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Dinard closed for Ryanair?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Aug 2003, 03:56
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Wickford,Essex,England
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please note the time 1100 Z +2 = LUNCH TIME
Steamhead is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2003, 19:19
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can see the headlines now "CLOSED AIRFIELD FORCES RYANAIR FLIGHTS TO DIVERT TO A REAL AIRPORT" and "Passengers amazed to discover that there ARE airports near the cities in Europe "
OpsMon is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2003, 03:58
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a few questions:

As I've heard, pilots sign in +45 mins (C/A's +60mins) Now that is what I call getting priorities correct?!?

They then have to be onboard +30 mins. If Ops don't do a pre-flt check of all NOTAMS, crappy Wx diversions etc. then no way can crews do it professionally and correctly in 15 mins. I suspect this +45mins is for FTL/duty time criterea.

Now, if the flight was delayed so the crew could do the pre-flight job competely, to what would the delay be credited? If the crews come in early what is the consequence on duty times?

I presume they are audited by their FOI, and I presume someone from the authority occasionally flies as an observer. This can not be an unknown fact; so who is turning a blind eye?

The cost of a diversion or lengthy holding due to lack of ATC, which could have been avoided by a delayed departure, can hardly be considered a cost saving, which was the objective of the exercise in the first place.

Having said that; there are many airlines who did not introduce CAT2/3 ops on a cost analysis basis. i.e. the cost of such ops was greater than the few diversions. No doubt something similar applies here, in that the number of ops staff and crew duty times has been costed versus the occasional inconvenience.

As management pilots are regular fliers they must be aware of the situation and condone it, or have no problem. Ask them how they do it and follow suit.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2003, 04:42
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Denmark
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote: OK then, we'll hold overhead until then!

Did'n think Ryanair carried extra fuel to hold with

Crewcut
Crewcut is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2003, 05:06
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tankering round trip i guess!
Vapor is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2003, 16:44
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Stansted
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What I am about to say does not excuse not reading the notams but as with everything there is the other side.

As for the 45 min report yes its tight but in reality because of the professionalism in Ryanair most Captains and FOs are nearly always there 1 hour before and more.

I myself ending up holding at one of our airports in Germany due ATC being closed early one morning. Yes I did read the notam but we pushed back early, several directs from ATC and stonking tailwind before we knew it we were arriving 10 mins before the airport opened even with slowing down. S**t happenens. Might this have happened in Dinard?

As for this low cost divorce material rubbish. I like being in my own bed every night and I enjoy even more my guaranteed 3 days off every week. Been in FR 5 years dont know of any divorces yet. Several divorced pre Ryanair.

Even better no night flights saw Air 2000 crew going through Enterprise House about 2330 one night to start work. NO THANKS.

Considering the amount of flying we do and the multi sector days that go by without incident or problem then perhaps the critics of the Dinard crew will give us credit where due. Somehow I doubt it though.
Say Mach Number is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2003, 02:11
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Central Europe
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Haste makes waste. Short turnarounds, many sectors?
Frosch is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2003, 17:38
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mach,
What a well written response to all the Ryan basher's.Reckon they must all be jealous of us!
eng123 is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2003, 05:02
  #29 (permalink)  
Instrument Ranting
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Exclamation

What is the situation leaglly for a commercial flight in this situation?

If the ground and passenger handling facilities are expecting them, can they land without air traffic?

Or does no ATC mean no fire cover?
 
Old 9th Sep 2003, 16:49
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: where ever I lay my head
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

Agree with Mach fully!

The best prove is in the pudding: all the complainers have never worked and or never will work for RYR..

The ones who do are happy, well paid, flying a lot and know what the schedule is and sleep at home thank you very much!
Aviation Trainer too is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.