PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   Helicopter crash Breighton aerodrome (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/581693-helicopter-crash-breighton-aerodrome.html)

SilsoeSid 26th Jul 2016 19:30

It was mentioned on the other thread that the ac underwent a major overhaul recently; after reading here about some of the reasons to have it on a hungarian registration, I wonder what the investigation will find.

stringfellow 26th Jul 2016 20:58

Hi Steve. I have met you and your sidekick Nigel at various heli related events over the past few years. I feel your pain and despair. He was a lovely man, the term larger than life was made for him. As for other comments on here I don't feel angry just terrified at the prospect of losing breath discussing them.

nigelh 27th Jul 2016 16:31

Very sad indeed . RIP .
I hear he did a quick stop , came to the hover and there was a Bang ...next thing it was on the ground .

SilsoeSid 27th Jul 2016 18:45

Are you suggesting an engine problem Nigel?

Apparently they can be fitted with a gazelle engine (http://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/230...ml#post1536265), plenty around if you have the contacts (http://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/397...ml#post5361389)

nigelh 27th Jul 2016 19:04

All i know is what i heard . A bang could be just about anything ...whatever it was it left no time to do anything it appears . Tragic .

SilsoeSid 27th Jul 2016 20:28


The AAIB said it was sending investigators to the site after “one of the persons on board passed away”.

Investigators had been carrying out the inquiry by correspondence, without visiting the site.

But it said in a statement it had now become a “field investigation” following the death.

The wreckage was removed from Breighton airfield, where a 1940s themed event of classic aircrafts was being hosted.
Man dies after helicopter crash (From York Press)

As the ac has already been removed and the area presumably tidied up, how does this affect the investigation? Out of interest, where was the airframe taken to and had the paperwork already been impounded?

md 600 driver 27th Jul 2016 20:48


Originally Posted by SilsoeSid (Post 9454017)
Man dies after helicopter crash (From York Press)

As the ac has already been removed and the area presumably tidied up, how does this affect the investigation? Out of interest, where was the airframe taken to and had the paperwork already been impounded?

Sid as usual you do get it wrong

AAIB investigators have moved the investigation to a more involved one as one of the occupants (the pilot )has sadly died
The aircraft is STILL at BREIGHTON and the AAIB will be moving it tomorrow from BREIGHTON to farnbrough , on a truck if you want I will get the registration number for you
The paperwork that was in the helicopter has been given to the AAIB and all the log cards /form1 /airframe / engine /airworthiness docs ect books are all being packaged up and sent to the AAIB
At Farnborough to assist them with their investigation
Thanks for your concerns but I think the AAIB have every thing in hand it's not the first time they've done this

SilsoeSid 27th Jul 2016 21:13


As the ac has already been removed and the area presumably tidied up, how does this affect the investigation? Out of interest, where was the airframe taken to and had the paperwork already been impounded?

Sid as usual you do get it wrong

The aircraft is STILL at BREIGHTON and the AAIB will be moving it tomorrow from BREIGHTON to farnbrough


Just quoted the article MD. Sorry if I misunderstood when it said, "The wreckage was removed from Breighton airfield, " I could only surmise that it had been removed from the airfield.

As your account of things seems to differ to that of the article, I suggest you help the AAIB as best you can, you may even know the history of the engine.

So, the paperwork is now being bundled to be sent on to the AAIB, ten days after the event, thanks for that.

https://adarvetranslationsblog.files...-messenger.gif

md 600 driver 27th Jul 2016 21:22

sid

maybe i am a bit thick was your cartoons supposed to mean something?
hopefully it was directed at me ,not the deceased /

also i was intrigued by your mention of the engine is there something one needs to know about the engine ,or do you know something about the engine that every one needs to know ?

PENNINE BOY 27th Jul 2016 21:23

SS
 
Sid!
Wait for the report to come out, stop behaving like a spoilt child! A great guy has lost his life and you keep digging for ****! :ugh:

jellycopter 28th Jul 2016 05:32

Steve. Don't waste your breath! JJ

[email protected] 28th Jul 2016 06:40

I think Sid's point is that, following a military accident (which this clearly isn't), all documents for the aircraft would be immediately impounded so that any evidence would be preserved as it was at the time of the crash.

More difficult to ensure with a private operator and more difficult therefore for the AAIB to guarantee no interference post crash with the documentation.

I am NOT saying this could be the case with this sad accident but I think there is scope in the aviation community to 'lose' dodgy paperwork post accident.

SilsoeSid 28th Jul 2016 06:52

So, I link to a news report, as we all do, that says "The wreckage was removed from Breighton airfield" . When I ask how this removal would affect the investigation, I am told that I am wrong.

Nigleh tells us he heard that "the ac did a quick stop, (with 5 pob!) came to the hover and there was a Bang ...next thing it was on the ground." I ask if he is suggesting that this could be an engine issue and I am told that I am wrong.



MD;
maybe i am a bit thick was your cartoons supposed to mean something?
hopefully it was directed at me ,not the deceased /

also i was intrigued by your mention of the engine is there something one needs to know about the engine ,or do you know something about the engine that every one needs to know ?
The cartoon is MD trying to shoot the messenger, but getting it wrong.

As for the engine reference, I think you'll find that after his description of the incident, I asked nigelh if he was suggesting there is an engine issue here. Knowing that MD has knowledge about Alouettes being fitted with Gazelle engines and that he knows/knew someone selling a load off, as referred to in my links, he might know more than most about the engines fitted to Alouettes.


As for the comment; "Thanks for your concerns but I think the AAIB have every thing in hand it's not the first time they've done this".

I'm sure that it isn't, and more importantly it won't be the last; however things such as the ac's removal from the site, investigation by correspondence, and paperwork bundling up ten days after ... imho ... would suggest that perhaps in future some things might need assessing.

SilsoeSid 28th Jul 2016 07:07

PB;

Sid!
Wait for the report to come out, stop behaving like a spoilt child! A great guy has lost his life and you keep digging for ****! :ugh:
I'm ok with taking your abuse, as long as in the meantime we can find something that may prevent this happening again before that report comes out next year+ ....

Is it really me that you need to vent out at?
Taken from the comments of others here;

nigelh - Quick stops 5 on board
MD600driver - Tail rotor failure
nigelh - Engine problem
Bellringer - Compressor stall
Hughes500 - Cheap Parts
MD600driver - Cheaper maintenance
MD600driver - LPC trainers/licensing problems in UK
toptobottom - Recent big overhaul (other thread)



At the moment this is post 94 of this thread!

Bell_ringer 28th Jul 2016 08:07

Oi. Leave me out of the handbags at dawn. :ouch:

Considering the breadth of experience in this forum, and those that know the Alo and Gaz very well, I was simply asking a question in the context of some discussions around these motors and compressor surge when a lot of power is pulled rapidly. Supposedly, apart from power loss, it could result in a backfire (bang?).

This may be complete nonsense and was hoping someone could clarify if this is a known characteristic of those old engines.

EESDL 28th Jul 2016 14:50

Same old same old
 
Well this is running true to form.
Same old response and protagonists after every accident.
At what point does the thread split - one for condolences and the other for a mix of wild speculation and bollox?

I appreciate it is a rumour network but please retain some decorum - oh hang on - too early for that input - that is usually after circa 130 posts.......

SilsoeSid 28th Jul 2016 18:03


At what point does the thread split - one for condolences and the other for a mix of wild speculation and bollox?
About three days ago!

http://www.paulserra.com/wp-content/...nger-pulse.jpg

:ugh:

Hughes500 28th Jul 2016 21:30

Sid

I really suggest you owe a lot of people a really big apology here. How f..king dare you suggest in your list that anyone should vent at me about cheap parts. I was asked why people put ac on other registers. I answered the comment with an example ( 341 not the type in question ) were the parts cheaper, yes but exactly the same, so do not imply that the parts are not airworthy and link it to this crash. My post has nothing to do with why the ac crashed and why would you suggest anyone should vent at me for answering a question
Quite frankly you are way out of order

SilsoeSid 28th Jul 2016 22:25

H500, after I was vented at for simply quoting a news article, I think you'll find that it went like this;

I asked the question, 'What, if any, are the regs for carrying passengers in Hungarian registered ex military aircraft?'

Crab came back with, "I think there are all sorts of regulations that are 'worked around' with the Hungarian registration - many of them related to dodgy maintenance practices and component histories."

Then you added to the topic with, "If it is anything like having the 341 on the YU reg it is to do with cheaper parts ..."


My question was nothing to do with parts, maintenance nor licensing, it was purely about passenger carrying.
You brought 'cheaper parts' to the thread which is why it was mentioned in the list of what people have commented on. Nobody, apart from you, has mentioned any airworthiness issues.

ericferret 29th Jul 2016 10:14

Rather surprised to see the suggestion that an Alouette 2 can be converted to fly with an Astazou 111 or XIV (see post 84).
Is there any evidence to support this idea? Alouettes were sold with either the Artouste II or the Astazou IIA (not a Gazelle variant).

I note that the Alouette II is a non-EASA aircraft and therefore it's maintenance is regulated by the country of registration. So to determine any airworthiness issues you need to be aware of the local regulations.


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:04.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.