PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   MD - All Not Good in Mesa (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/374308-md-all-not-good-mesa.html)

TeeS 12th Dec 2010 14:08

Hi Wallsend

Unfortunately, I have never flown the 902 but have always had a respect for it as a HEMS machine. That view has been supported by comments from pilots who have flown it and loved it (I've yet to meet one who has flown it and not loved it for the job).

However, going back to the red decision to go EC135, I banged the table to one of those senior redtop men that the 902 would be a far superior HEMS machine. What more could we ask than a great big boxy cabin and a tail rotor fan tucked away from danger? The response was that the MD people were very nice people to deal with (and this was in the very early days after MD got sold off) but that at that time the support that MD could offer was not what we would demand for our customers. Secondly, minor maintenance tasks like removing panels to change a generator were a nightmare compared to the 135. Exchange rates may have had an impact on the decision but the comments above appear to have been prophetic about the 902's problems to date.

I have never seen evidence of the maintenance problems on the 135 that you mention, generally the engineers love it.

Regards

TeeS

wallsend 12th Dec 2010 15:31

Hi Tees,

Re the redtop decision, I bow to your obviously superior knowledge on that. I'm only repeating what I was told by a long-time operator with them who was on the inside at the time.

Re the engineers loving it. You would have recognised utter hatred in the eyes of the engineer I saw last week! But it was freezing in the hangar which didn't help!

Further to engineering, the 135 is a delight to Check A. The 902 isn't (it can be a complete pain). That's because everything's high up on the machine. That's the downside of the big cabin.

You mention the "902's problems to date." I would take issue with the "to date" part of your comment there. I'm probably tempting providence but things are pretty good at the moment and have been for some time. We could engage in "what if LT does this or that" but certainly the support I see for the 902s I deal with is the same if not superior to that of the 135s I see.

Bertie Thruster 12th Dec 2010 16:14


minor maintenance tasks like removing panels to change a generator were a nightmare compared to the 135
Takes about 10 minutes to take the relevant panel off. How often do you need to change a generator?!

mfriskel 12th Dec 2010 17:02


I like flying the 135 a lot but I am regularly mystified by the absolutely virulently negative attitude some peolple have towards the 902. The only thing they seem have in common is that they aren't type rated on it. (it can't, of course, because some have a vested interest in pushing Eurocopter products...oh no:rolleyes:)
This is a great comment and I have run into it many times with the Explorer and the NOTAR in general. When I was hired at MD a very good friend of mine told me how poor the NOTAR was, how I was going to hate flying helicopters with NOTAR, and how much of a mistake I probably made- just a terrible idea and system all-in-all. Well the first thing when I went to work was a 520N transition. It was different. It wasn't better nor worse than tail-rotor machines I had flown, but it was different. Just like a 206 is different than a 500 or a 120. I found no great problems with it and with a 5 hour transition at the factory I was comfortable with it and saw no great nor even small problems.
I called my friend and told him what I thought and asked him how much time he had in NOTAR machines and why he disliked the system so much. His reply was that he had never flown one, that was just what he had heard. I ran across this many times in my 8 years at MD and still heard it today. From 99 to 2005, much of that was diven by friendly marketeers from a major European helicopter manufacturer. I have lots of 1 on 1 conversations to verify that.

wallsend 12th Dec 2010 17:50

I too was uncertain even sceptical about the Notar system before I was type-rated on the Explorer. Then one day I saw a 902 hover taxying very slowly with a 40 kt crosswind from the right. Something I had been told emphatically it couldn't do!!

Bertie Thruster 12th Dec 2010 18:13

Cue Raphael Ravenscroft's sax intro in Gerry Rafferty's 'Baker Street'. It's a lurve thing!

wallsend 12th Dec 2010 18:49

Are you on the Merlot already Bertie?!

PANews 13th Dec 2010 00:10

Wallsend

i can only assume that those that support the 135 and denigrate the 902 are awake and make good use of their communication skills.

I never heard of the instance you mention very vaguely in your post [so effectively I still have not got any information upon which I can ask questions].

I have absolutely no reason not to write negative stuff about the 135 or any other airframe type but as the promoters of the 902 [or are they just denigrators of the 135?] seem to have been particularly incapable of getting their positive information out there. Getting chapter and verse on any negatives to me seems not to be an option.

All the material in PAN is based upon input - and I am not aware of running any detrimental to 902 stuff in ages.

They say you get out what you put in.

Input NIL:oh:

Output NIL :ouch:

wallsend 13th Dec 2010 12:02

To take your point about the information concerning the 135 that was out for 5 weeks. This was a police machine that left its northern base in mid-Feb this year and did not return until end-March. The reason for not spouting on about it was here or passing it for inclusion in your journal was confidentiality. I.e. not letting the bad lads in the region know there was no immediate air support to curtail their games - something the 135 and its crews there had been very successful at. (I don't intend to spill any more beans on this one you'll just have to take my word on it but I spent a lot of time hanging on the end of a phone at the time frustratingly awaiting its return!)

Re denigrating the 135. Here's some comments from my recent posts on this thread:

"I like flying the 135 a lot" and "the 135 is a delight to Check A". I would add to those statements it's brilliant OEI performance and the superb training mode in the CPDS versions.

My point is that there's probably not a lot to choose between the 135 and the 902, but that some people seem desperate to run the latter down without a lot of evidence to support their views.

Long may they BOTH continue in service!!

Wagging Finger 13th Dec 2010 14:24

They all have a little something
 
Well said Wallsend,

Aircraft availability being discussed in a public forum is a bit of a no no when it comes to Police Aircraft, so well done in not 'dropping a line' to the press who after all rely on tidbits from operators to provide copy and therefore justify it's inclusion their 'magazine'. if we were a little more circumspect in our dealings with the press perhaps they would have to start to work for a living!:eek:

Both aircraft have something to offer in the Police/HEMS role, Both have their evangelists and doomsayers.

Ultimately it's down to what suits the unit at the time as to which gets purchased.

Both aircraft do the job and do it well, may it continue into the future.
:=

props stopped 13th Dec 2010 19:59

MD - price rise or no price rise?
 
Getting back on the thread so to speak...Whats the news over in the Mesa MD shop these days, now we've heard about the northern 135 maintenance saga.

The Dauphin seems to be the cab of choice for ambulance work...ask the great north charity as they have just purchased 2 x N2's after trying the 902 in the past..

Is LT still saying she's in it for the long haul (ten years or more) or IS she actually trying to sell the MD line after losing the military contract?

All I can only see on her web pages, is that she's just talking about what a fantastic spokesman/person for womans issues she is these days, no mention about MD and its line?

Who owns the most in the MD partnership.... her or her right hand man Joep? I havent heard much from him about MD lately?

md 600 driver 13th Dec 2010 21:04

props stopped


The Dauphin seems to be the cab of choice for ambulance work...ask the great north charity as they have just purchased 2 x N2's after trying the 902 in the past..

i think you may find thats down to money the 2 N2,S they have bought are 19/20 year old helicopters if they bought 2x 902 they would proberbly would have paid double or treble the amount

they also only leased the 902 not bought it

mfriskel
i agree with you when i had my 600 i got told by loads of people that the notar was no good when i asked them which notar they had flown it was none they got told by someone ,but when they flew it most people loved it it does have problems but most helicopters have, i think there is only one near perfect helicopter the gazelle

i can remember when you did a demonstation for me at HAI and showed me how to land without using pedals in a storm drain in LA ,then you lifted off without pedals too that sold it to me

i dont have any problem with any critism of the 520/600/902 but when it comes by hearsay and the pilots never been in one it annoys me

in uk sport we have a saying non players off the pitch

props stopped 13th Dec 2010 21:34

Mesa - LT's narnia
 
md driver,
As seniortrooper so aptly put it, I think you will find they said "notar" to another 902, leased or not ;)

Anyone got any news from Mesa on whats really going on with the company or should I say LT?

Ps, I havent had my xmas card off LT yet :confused:

PANews 14th Dec 2010 09:03

Props Stopped

You seem to have blundered into some breaking news there..... or entered a time warp..... Joep????? He was the previous owner wasn't he? He who is and has been harried by the Dutch authorities for [allegedly] doing naughty things gave up with MD when LT and her [regularly changing] gang moved in as saviours.

LT and Patriarch are the money behind MD, and LT is Patriarch.

On the other thing raised by Wagging Finger about sensible reporting of aircraft availability ...... I think you will find that some publications that are based upon persons who were playing the cop game when you were likely in nappies actually manage to get that type of news out after the event - with the notable exception of such as the WMP 135 which was severely and publicly, 'offline' as national news before the report appeared.

You could of course take exception to the recent nationally available and regionally reported Press Release from a midlands aircraft supplier that inserted an A109 into a RAF airfield north of Huntingdon simply because the police aircraft was missing on maintenance for 5 days.

It will be back in service before I report that public domain story.

props stopped 14th Dec 2010 09:43

Time warp
 
PAN,
I cant stop humming that "time warp" song now ;)

I think you may find Joep still has his fingers in MD, and is closely working with LT on other projects. Is he really the money behind LT after all, and are all these revolving doors with company names just a smoke screen.

He never left MD and is still a shareholder I believe.
I'm sure it will all come out eventually, but will it be only in the Dutch press again :suspect:

wallsend 14th Dec 2010 14:54

Props stopped you said re GNAA and 902: "I think you will find they said "notar" to another 902, leased or not"

Totally wrong. I was there. They loved it - wanted 2 or 3 but too expensive.

Message ends.

md 600 driver 14th Dec 2010 15:07

Props stopped

have you ever flown the 900/902 or had any experence of it or is knowledge all 10th hand

wallsend 14th Dec 2010 15:21

314th hand, I suspect...

Thomas coupling 15th Dec 2010 08:51

MD600 and wallsend (I suspect I know you). You're a pair of little tinkers aren't you! Repetitive and monotonous:uhoh:
Wallsend - read my earlier post more carefully old boy. I haven't mentioned the handling characteristics or performance of said aircraft, have I? Not once have I condemned it for it's capabilities as a HEMS cab (or even a police cab for that matter).
What has knifed the 902 in the back (and now it's time for me to be repetitive) is the maintenance and quality support by the OEM. Crap is too kind a word. The company is run by outsiders who have absolutely no interest whatsoever in aviation let alone running a helicopter production line. They have no research division, no customer after care department and so it goes on. There are no plans to give it a mid life upgrade.
Once you've bought the cab...guess what, you're on your own and by that I mean it's left to the subsidiary company (local supplier) to offer these services if they so wish. Luckily, the likes of PAS are such a company but even they struggle to hide the mess MD Helicopters has turned out to be.

I haven't driven a Delorean, I haven't been to the moon, but guess what - one doesn't need to be there / do that, to know what the problems are. Do you understand now?
The 902 is being hindered by its dysfunctional parent company.....it is doomed and in 5-10 yrs time, if nothing changes, there won't be any left in the UK. And I haven't even mentioned costs:=

props stopped 15th Dec 2010 09:35

Well said TC
 
TC,
I could have have put it better. :D

md 600 driver 15th Dec 2010 09:43

props stopped
how many hours then?

props stopped 15th Dec 2010 10:00

repetitive
 
TC you were right about the repetitive 'little' bit as well.

To think Joep is 'PAS' if anybody hadnt caught on here...

What now for MD...over to you LT

Merry xmas to one and all...am off to bermuda for a short break.. if I see Joep over there I'll pass on his chap Wallsends regards ;)

Bertie Thruster 15th Dec 2010 11:19


There are no plans to give it a mid life upgrade
TC obviously has a direct line to LT.

Anyway our crew happy this year with 206 to 207 engines, extra 250lb of (public transport) payload, nvg cockpit, trakka beam spot, improved aircon, improved eng intake filtration and active NACA doors (volcanos?), extra 200 lb(below floor)fuel tank....and tinted windows!

All usual 'add-ons' - (talking 'range bearing height' TCAS (brilliant:ok:), integrated moving map, extra strobes, chelton airwave)-now housed internally, no belly pod, giving extra, rough ground, landing clearance;

md 600 driver 15th Dec 2010 11:50

it all seems to be a lot of hearsay from people who ought to know better or disinformation for other commercial reasons

any way i am off to york in my LADA lol

Thomas coupling 15th Dec 2010 11:58

Bertie: the engine upgrade is just that an ENGINE upgrade, not an airframe upgrade. The 207 has been incoming for the 902 for atleast 3 possibly more years?? It needed it too!
The fuel tank is a bolt on mod and not an airframe upgrade simply because its original endurance was piddling when you stuck all the police/hems mods onto it. I seem to remember it couldnt go past the 90 mins endurance is that correct. What is it now at your new AUM?
The rest you're on about is lightweight stuff mainly driven by the customer with regard to their ops especially your last para presumably?
MD Helicopters won't inject millions to improve the gearbox for example, or blade aerodynamics, or fly by wire etc etc. They don't see it as part of their plan. I would love to be proven wrong though, believe me:\

tbc 15th Dec 2010 18:08

http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/a...Whodidthis.jpg

lynx no more 15th Dec 2010 18:33

Here we go again
 
tbc, is that the new MD LT xmas card photo? It looks a bit out of focus, have a word with that chap playing with the camera.

Saudi Gazette have a snippet on MD in Manila.

Saudi Gazette - Manila suspends $90m worth military tenders

In 2008, a tender for six night-capable attack helicopters worth $29 million was scrapped due to alleged collusions between some army officials and US-based MD Helicopters Inc.

PANews 15th Dec 2010 19:40

Not guilty m'lud
 
It takes two to tango.

In some countries a sweetener is expected and if accurate this story suggests that two companies came a cropper when this practice became common knowledge to the wringing hands brigade. The main loser being the customer with no aircraft in service it seems.

Not so sure you can pin this on MD.... clearly something happened in 2008 involving them.... [but it escaped the attentions of Ppruners I guess], the latest, modern, one is PZL spinning out and losing the sale of some Kania's [or the like] to meet the same still open requirement.

Is this where we introduce BAe Systems and the Saudi's to the thread? And I recall Eurocopter having similar problems not too far back ..... lummy...:ooh: Did I say that? :ouch:

mfriskel 15th Dec 2010 20:38

I believe that the PWC 207E engines have been the engine delivered in every Explorer since about 2002. If you look at the performance charts and CAT capability from 206E to 207E, I think you will see it was an improvement. If you look at thruster extension, that was an improvement. By the way, that was required to replace an airworthiness issued on an "equivellant level of safety" at the very heavy lobbying of someone- hmmmm I wonder who? Anyway, an airworthiness being revoked based on no history of safety issues? Wow- I wonder how that got started- hmmm- let me think? Couldn't have been another manufacturer worried about the success of the Explorer- NOOOO couldn't have been. Oh well, that was completed in 2005 with all parts issued (FREE OF CHARGE) by years end of 2006. Let's see- no revocation of airworthness for products proven to be substandard by other manufacturers- ie AS350 hydraulic system, EC-145 lack of tail authority within the approved flight envelope (and no equivilent level of safety for a tail-rotor machine- people were hurt), EC-145 lack of electrical capacity, lack of ventelation without aircon installed, EC-145 lack of ability to deliver sufficient fuel to the engines in certain areas of the approved flight envelope. Interesting how these things work. I guess the rules don't apply if you have backing of lots of capital or you are a govt subsidized company, or both.
Improved AC system, that started in 2001 or earlier. Under floor aux tank, been available since 2000 or 2001. That became an option once the AC system was all moved out of the boat-tail area to the cabin roof.
Rotor blades? What is deficient about the rotor blades? Does the transmission need an upgrade? The 006 seems to be working quite well with the current configuration and the 6500 pound growss weight. Did I mention a 250 pound increase in internal gross weight for all acft in 2005? So anyway, lots of improvements to the Explorer and the current configuration is quite capable. Have there been any improvements since Oct 2005- I think the answer is no to that. All of the current goodies were developed and certified pre- current MD.

Coconutty 16th Dec 2010 09:52

PAN,

Going back a few posts :

All the material in PAN is based upon input - and I am not aware of running any detrimental to 902 stuff in ages.
Does that in itself not warrant a mention ?

I guess that if you develop a reputation for being a 902 basher, then you won't get much Input at all from the 902 community - good or bad.


http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d1.../Coconutty.jpg

PANews 16th Dec 2010 12:47

Coconutty

Sorry that is a mighty lame excuse, but your choice.

In the event a lot of the 902 'bashing' was not only ages ago but well placed AT THE TIME . Most of the 902 people were in denial but it came to pass pretty much as stated and MDHI collapsed like a pack of cards. Enter LT.

It [the thread of problems that I spoke of years ago] has gone away now so being Elephantine over what it now ancient history does not show some people up in a good light.

If I can 'get on' with the bloke who tried to kill me with a knife 20 years ago I think this piffling matter ought to be well buried. Even if you had an issue at the time, even if you were wronged at the time, it is so old that you need to just grow up.

If not.... I don't care. Your loss.

mfriskel 16th Dec 2010 14:55

But PAN, you were a big basher of the machine not the company. You did bash both, but you seemed to have an extreeme hard-on for the Explorer in particular. That does not seem to fit your response to coconutty. It was directed too, as you never would bring up faults and short-commings of the EC products, and there are many. It was like reading political writings from American journalists- one sided and not totally truthful- I think it is called BIASED. That is actually OK in a free society. You can be as biased as you want- no harm in it at all. But you have to accept that we see you as biased and should not complain when you are called biased.

wright123 16th Dec 2010 15:41

MD
 
Mfriskel,
I have to step into this thread about your post on PAN and MD.
PAN isnt biased, I read his online PAN edition each month, and he tells it how it is and its very informative about all apsects of the industry.

If the MD products or company deserved a dig at the time so be it, its no good whinging about it is there. Everyone in the industry knows whats happened over the years, it doesnt seem to be getting any better with some of the alleged deals that are coming to light here and there which makes me:yuk:

As others have said, if the company is in it for the long run so be it, but I doubt it, and no I havent got an inside line to LT either, she seems to have gone very quiet of late dont you think?

Keep up the good work PAN :ok:

mfriskel 16th Dec 2010 16:12

If you re-read my post - it was on PAN and EXPLORER, not PAN and MD. There is no-one in this world who can defend the actions of MD of the past few years. MD had a good run from 1999 to 2003, but things went South for a handful of reasons. The helicopter community thought all would be better in August of 2005, but as we see, that was not mean to be. The posts that PAN is included in were pointed more directly at his bashing of a product at a time when it was actually doing well and being improved. No arguments about the company, but the bashing of the machine is where my comments and also I belive coconutty's comments come from.
As I said, bias if fine, no problems with that. I am biased myself. Just admit it. The time he started writing this stuff the Explorer was heading the right direction. Too bad it was such a short trip!

md 600 driver 16th Dec 2010 18:06

sorry wright123 your wrong456 this time
pan has been very pro eurocopter i thought he was on commission one time ,and a big basher of the explorer over the years his last posts have been more level

PANews 16th Dec 2010 18:35

Well perhaps [even if your allegation is true] this takes us back to where we started.... Coconutty effectively stating 'not telling you even if its good' .... real schoolboy stuff.

I write as I write and clearly at least one person out there defends what I have written. PAN has been out there for 15 years and to be honest it is the opinion of the wider market that matters not the dozen 902 philes in the UK.

Too much out there really to be specific but to say I have not 'slated' other brands does not hold water.... I have been pretty dismissive of the 135, 145 and 109 headroom [mainly because I am 6feet 5] and that is a plus for the 902 lots of headroom for me there... and sooooo quiet ... 135 Arris pots came and went a way back.... 145 maintenance....all sorts of things that were negative against that Franco-German company.

Not an English company mind you.... why would I have a great love for Eurocopter? Do they make something well perhaps? Something that thousands of people across the world buy? Something that is built under licence in nearly every continent of the world..... yes why would I?

And the dissing of the 902 and MD was always based on the information out there.... the anti-squad seem to suggest I made it up... but then seemed incapable of ever pointing to any specific instance where I had made it up! Reason is of course was that the 'stuff' was all too real and often supplied by 902 drivers who were not as enchanted as Coconutty and friends. Yes I even met some one who found that the 902 scared the poo out of him [even if that reaction was rare]. He got out, which was his only option.

Perhaps I was never supposed to mention that MDHI were shaky [long before anyone else], that there were production problems, that the Dutch still have a 902 in their hangar in 2010..... primarily as hostage to their own distastful experience ...but I have a problem with that.... they have. So sorry chaps I write about that because its real. You send me good stuff... or if I find it.... its in. Saudi Arabian HEMS was a good story... but that turned awful..... not the 902s fault.... but try telling that to the potential buyer.

Overall I think you will find that even the mentions of the 902 are just a tiny part of the thousands.... or is it millions of words written as PAN since 1996. And which bit are you whingeing about .... and which bit have you been whingeing about since the year dot? I doubt even you lot know.

I guess the trouble is that some [maybe many] readers only read the paragraph that relates to themselves rather than taking it in as nothing more than a digest of what is going on in the world of the airborne emergency services. Bit like only reading the back two pages of The Sun and having an opinion on World Politics.

Still there is one thing to look forward to.... that number on the left keeps getting higher.... 64 now.... one day I will stop writing and then you can find someone else to whinge about!:)

lynx no more 16th Dec 2010 19:06

MD xmas bonus
 
PAN, your monthly edition is the best police/ambulance monthly I've seen, its well written, and doesnt seem biased from where I'm sitting, and its free to read online :D

Reading about the Aris pot saga took me back to riding the EC buzz bomb, what a bumpy ride they were when they went, some times two went each week, and it took ages for EADS to sort, but not nearly as bumpy as the MD company ride and its management revolving doors. But this is the MD -not all good at Mesa thread after all.
I agree with not writing about police a/c out of action while the ship is down, but all of the different news stories about MD has got to make even the most die hard MD fan wonder what has been going on over there???

Less than 2 weeks to go, and I still havent seen the latest LT xmas card this side of the pond! So come on LT lets be having it.
Anyone in the states got one yet?? :E

Hughes500 16th Dec 2010 20:05

Me thinks this getting away from the original thread and has become a 135 versus 902 argument. What is going on at the factory ?
Personally I run the 500 product, 6 years ago I was quoted 18 months for a new rotor drive shaft and tail rotor strap pack. Ordered a strap pack on Friday last week, in no hurry for it, it arrived yesterday. From my point of view spares support is great and much improved on 6 years ago:D

PANews 17th Dec 2010 09:59

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10932568/Lyn...n2006Dubai.jpg

Well no 'Card here either..... not so sure that many get them.... but I found a typical marketing pose in my archive under Dubai 2006...... they were not there this year....

HAI have issued some news that should warm the cockles of her heart.... they have just put in post one James McKenna as Director of Communications. It was he who famously wrote an item on an MD press conference at HAI and published lots of 'lies'.... basically he wrote what he remembered but she pulled it to pieces using the video and audio recording of the event..... slaughtered is a pretty good description .... from then on he was guest of dishonour at every MD Press Conference. He is a very nice man but LT minces peoples lives quite methodically and we have seen the revolving door of management pretty much proving that. Jim gave up being a journalist.... joined Bell's PR team briefly.... etc etc

Since then its fair to say there is not a publication that contains anything about their press conferences that is not written by MD! Outside [recorded] Press Conferences that is possibly a different matter.

wright123 18th Dec 2010 10:54

While browsing for the latest LT card I came upon this article about a turkish incident which I hadnt heard about.

Does anyone know what the outcome was for the widows involved, and what was the actual cause of the loss of these guys?

Text and Ideas


A new lawsuit is raising serious questions about the safety of helicopters made in Mesa and used by law enforcement agencies around the world, including on patrols along the U.S. border.

It stems from the deaths of five Turkish National Police officers who were killed in 2006 when their helicopter had problems in midflight in clear weather and crashed onto a crowded street in a resort city along the Mediterranean coast.

Late last month, three of the men's widows filed a wrongful-death suit against the maker, MD Helicopters, accusing it of putting old parts into what were supposed to be new aircraft.

The suit calls into question the helicopter's basic design including its emergency warning and backup systems and size of its fuel tank. It also questions how the helicopter was built.

The concerns come nearly eight years after the U.S. government considered scrapping its use of the Mesa-made helicopter, known as the 600N, in Border Patrol operations because of safety concerns.

Despite those worries, however, the U.S. government still uses the helicopter in question, as do police agencies throughout the nation and world.

MD Helicopters was asked to respond to the allegations leveled by the suit, but neither company officials nor its corporate attorney returned multiple calls for comment.

CRASH ON A CLEAR DAY

On July 19, 2006, five members of the Turkish National Police were watching over a soccer match that drew big crowds in the coastal city of Antalya.

They were flying one of several 600Ns that were sold to the force about 18 months prior.

The aircraft is a lightweight six-passenger helicopter made for missions just such as this one. At least one of the two pilots had undergone extensive training at MD's Mesa headquarters.

Afternoon temperatures that day were hovering at about 90 degrees. There was a light breeze and not a cloud in the sky.

At about 5 p.m., the crew was just offshore in midflight above the Mediterranean Ocean when there were several loud bangs and the aircraft shivered.

The sounds were loud enough that passengers on a sightseeing boat nearby heard it, too, authorities learned later.

The startled crew set the aircraft on course for level ground beyond a tall seaside embankment. Witnesses said it appeared they were trying to come in for a landing.

Moments later, the helicopter surged quickly upward, lost control and plummeted toward a crowded city street.

It hit with unbelievable force, enough to crush the aircraft instantly and scatter parts hundreds of feet away, investigative reports show.

Fuel spilled out and caught fire. Emergency crews and bystanders tried to save the five officers, but it was too late.

The impact and blaze were too much for the men.

Pilots Hakan Caya and Kudrek Calik, and passengers Ramazan Can, Osman Karadag and Adem Vurucu were killed.

FEW ANSWERS

Because the crash took place overseas, there was no U.S. government investigation of the American-made aircraft.

Instead, the Turkish government invited corporate investigators from MD and two companies whose components were in the helicopter, Rolls-Royce and Goodrich, to inspect the wreckage days after the crash.

The main report is filled with charts, graphs and dozens of pages of text and photographs.

It has detailed information about the engine and onboard systems, but in the end reaches no real conclusions about what caused the crash. It also said nothing about what caused the loud bangs.

"There was no evidence ... to suggest the accident was as a result of a malfunction or failure of the engine," the report said.

The answers didn't satisfy the widows of the three officers who were the passengers of the 600N.

The families of Can, Karadag and Vurucu called the Chicago law firm Nolan Law Group which specializes in investigating aviation catastrophes. The women asked for help.

Chief investigator Tom Ellis was assigned to look into the crash and quickly spotted some red flags.

"There's a lot here," he said in a recent interview.

For one, "the Turkish police were told that they were getting a new helicopter" when it was delivered on Oct. 30, 2004, he said.

But records show the engine was at least five years old - built in 1999 - when it was installed.

Additionally, a piece of the engine known as the HMU, or hydromechanical unit, had about 65 hours already logged when it went into the helicopter, Ellis found.

According to MD's Web site, the longest the 600N can stay in the air during any given flight is a little more than four hours.

That means, according to figures Ellis provided, the engine part was used in at least 16 flights, and likely more, in a different helicopter before being put in the one delivered to the Turks.

Ellis also discovered there were issues with the warning and fuel systems on the helicopter.

If the pilot was experiencing trouble with the engine, those problems may have prevented him from doing anything about it until it was too late. Also, the fuel tank was large and possibly too big for the small copter, he said.

The last and most intriguing part of the investigation came with the discovery of tiny particles of plastic the corporate investigators found floating in clear liquid inside the HMU.

The plastic was unusual and investigators called it a "contaminant" in their report.

Ellis thought it might be the key to finding out what happened in Antalya.

The original investigators reached no conclusion about it, but when Ellis asked to inspect the part, it had been cleaned out and the plastic was gone.

Ellis said he believes it adds up to "destruction of evidence."

"At best for them, it is a gross negligent oversight," he said. "But I don't believe that piece is gone missing and that HMU is going to be cleaned like new just by a regular course of business. Somebody had to authorize that to be done."

On July 18 of this year, the widows, with the help of attorney Thomas Routh at the law firm, filed suit in Maricopa County Superior Court, accusing MD of wrongful death, negligence and product liability.

They are asking for "maximum" damages for the grief and loss of the livelihood for their families, all of which have children.

So far, the company has yet to respond.

PRIOR SAFETY CONCERNS

In 1998, news about the 600N was much brighter.

The U.S. government had just ordered 11 of the fledgling models for about $1.3 million each and said it would probably want 34 more in the years to come.

The feds planned to use the helicopters along the U.S. border to track drug smugglers and groups of undocumented immigrants.

The copters were quiet and made to fly at heights low enough that agents could make out footprints or tire tracks.

For MD, which was part of Boeing at the time, the order was big. If all 45 helicopters were delivered, it would have been the single largest order of the 600N since the model was OK'd to fly the year before.

The company bragged that the helicopter, which used a patented no-tail-rotor, or NOTAR system, was one of the safest and quietest on the market.

Just two years later, though, the feds put a screeching halt on their order.

Pilots using the 600N had reported the aircraft was hard to maneuver. There were times when they had to make specialized landings, and some felt it was unsafe given the design of the craft, according to a report by the U.S. General Accounting Office in 2000.

While there were no major incidents or crashes involving Border Patrol agents using the 600N, experienced pilots also told GAO investigators they were worried that the aircraft wasn't balanced quite right, that it was nose-heavy.

MD officials disputed the claims, and at one point said the pilots just had a misunderstanding of some of the specifics of the helicopter.

The government decided the complaints were too significant to ignore, but not enough to ground the fleet.

The Border Patrol canceled its remaining shipment and continued to fly the original 600Ns.

Today, 10 of those originals are some of the oldest in a fleet maintained by what is now U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Federal aviation records show all the copters are stationed in El Paso, Texas, but it's unclear how frequently they are being used. It's also unclear what happened to the 11th aircraft.

Agency spokesman Juan Munoz-Torres said he didn't know how many, if any, were being used in day-to-day operations. The models are likely to be phased out in the coming years, he said.

"Something that we need to look at is the fact that we are an extremely multidimensional type of organization," said Munoz-Torres.

No decisions have yet been made, he said.

While these helicopters are good for certain things like quietly tracking illegal border crossers, they aren't very versatile, he said.

Other law enforcement agencies in the U.S. have already phased out their use of the 600Ns and decided not to order any more.

In Los Angeles County, for example, the sheriff's department there used three of the helicopters in emergencies and patrols as recently as 2001.

Pilot Pat McKernan, a sheriff's deputy, declined to talk in-depth about why the department stopped using the 600Ns, saying he didn't want to upset the company.

But, he added, "Clearly we needed a different helicopter."

"I'm not going to say that we had issues," McKernan said. "But there was just aircraft that performed better."

Since the department stopped using MD, however, the company changed ownership and is now run by CEO Lynn Tilton, who McKernan said has "done a whole lot of good things to turn that company around."

According to the company Web site, MD is has sold few 600Ns to American companies or police agencies. Most are going oversees - to Brazil, Turkey, the UK and elsewhere.

Ellis, the Chicago investigator, urged buyers to look closely at their needs when considering the 600N.

"Before they make the decision to have these helicopters, they should take a good look at what their mission is and if these helicopters are what they need," he said.

In the end, he hopes to see the helicopter modified for the sake of Serpil Can, Aysegul Karadag and Fatma Vurucu, the widows of the men.

"They all have children and the mothers are looking to have their lives restored," he said.

The women are asking the company: "Make changes to make these helicopters safer."
The article was originally raised in Arizona press article.

Widows file suit against copter maker - East Valley Tribune - Arizona Local News: Home


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:28.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.