Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Where is 'thrust' pointing?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Where is 'thrust' pointing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th July 2003 | 03:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Question Where is 'thrust' pointing?

'Thrust' is considered by some as the rotor's force that is perpendicular to the tip path plane. Others considered 'thrust' as the horizontal component of the rotor's force.

Both definitions are probably valid for an airplane's propeller. Which is the correct one for a helicopter's rotor and what is the correct name of the other vector?
Dave_Jackson is offline  
Old 4th July 2003 | 03:54
  #2 (permalink)  
PPRuNe Enigma
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
How about "Total Rotor Thrust" for the force perpendicular to the disk ?

This can then be resolved into vertical and horizontal components.

In fact, there are two possible horizontal components - a longitudinal one for forward/back motion, and a lateral one if the helicopter is banked or traversing sideways.
Grainger is offline  
Old 4th July 2003 | 10:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: AB, Canada
As much as it seems like it would be convenient, there is not a universal standard for terminology, sign conventions, and variables with regard to helicopter aerodynamics. Check out Stepniewski & Keys book carefully and you'll see they aren't even consistent between their volumes.

I think of thrust as perpendicular to the tip path plane.

Whichever you use, make sure it's clear to your readers.

Matthew.
heedm is offline  
Old 5th July 2003 | 04:06
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Grainger & heedm


Thanks for the input.

Perhaps Stepniewski was ambidextrous. Perhaps when writing the two books, the left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing. Bad joke.

If 'thrust' is used for the vector perpendicular to the tip path plane and 'lift' is the vertical component, would 'push' or 'pull' be an appropriate word for the horizontal component(s)?
Dave_Jackson is offline  
Old 7th July 2003 | 08:46
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 1
From: USA
Dave,
In general terms, the thrust that is prouced by the main rotor is the vector sum of all the forces that the rotor produces. This thrust is very roughly perpendicular to the tip path plane. If the truth be known, the thrust is a very choppy wave form, with lots of 1 per rev and N per rev content, as well as oscillating in-plane "H" forces.

For accounting the forces on a flying machine, we divide all forces into four vectors, Lift and Weight, Thrust and Drag. In this parlance, the thrust is the sum of all propulsive forces on the aircraft. For a helicopter, this is the longitudinal component of the rotor thrust, and the net propulsive force from the engine exhaust.

There is no standard term for anything on our planet, why should thrust be any different?
NickLappos is offline  
Old 7th July 2003 | 13:19
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Nick,

Thanks for the additional information.
I hope you had an enjoyable and rewarding trip.
Dave_Jackson is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.