Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

parachutes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Oct 2002, 15:51
  #1 (permalink)  
widgeon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
parachutes

http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/du...ws/4210058.htm

Hmm what size chute would you need for a 2.5 tonne helicopter ?.
 
Old 6th Oct 2002, 23:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,840
Received 77 Likes on 32 Posts
I've heard of these. Nice to see that it works.
MightyGem is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2002, 23:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Above and Below Zero Lat. [Presently at least]
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hope he has a current Parachute License or some over trained Fed will be after him.....
Old Man Rotor is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2002, 01:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere, Over the Rainbow
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder what is the real factor here - a company made a plane with a parachute that saved someone, or a company made a plane that had an aileron go haywire?

Wonder if this technology will ever hit the world of eggbeaters...

Mike
TwinHueyMan is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2002, 19:28
  #5 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,234
Received 52 Likes on 28 Posts
I've flown with these on a number of small FW aircraft for flight test work. They're preferable to a spin-chute for a lighter aeroplane, because they don't alter the ratio of rolling to yawing rotational intertias. They're also preferable to personal parachutes for anything with a hard-to-escape-in-a-hurry cockpit, which is quite a few types of my intimate acquaintance.

The main manufacturer (responsible for the device in the Cirrus I believe) is BRS inc. in the USA. I've looked through their literature, which includes a huge number of successful saves in American homebuilts and ultralights. Great credit to the device, which has a near 100% save rate, but the vast majority of operations seem to be low ability pilots who had they been properly trained and current should have sorted themselves out with a proper forced landing / spin recovery / spiral dive recovery / etc. In this instance, I've not flown the Cirrus, but would be surprised if in reasonably benign conditions a FW aircraft of that sort of size and shape couldn't reasonably be navigated to an airfield and landed without use of ailerons unless the system was actually jammed into a continuous roll which -given he had time to call a Mayday - seems unlikely.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2002, 15:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: US
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's an interview with the pilot on line.




Just as I leveled off, I pulled the MP back to 25 inches, leveling for but a few seconds… and then the control yoke and the left wing started going OVER. There was a tremendous control force… I thought it was the autopilot going haywire. I didn't know what else to think."

Morrison knew he was in big trouble… he was less than 1500 feet above the ground, rolling/descending hard left and losing altitude like a plugged Mallard…

"I thought it felt like the autopilot… but it felt like the autopilot on steroids… it was really pulling hard, I mean I couldn't get it back… it just kept going. That was the only time in the whole episode that I was really frightened, because the airplane was going over. I'm still thinking autopilot, I'm hitting the thumb switch (autopilot disconnect) and nothing's happening… so I reach down, thinking to pull/check the circuit breaker and when I do, I happened to glance down/out the left side of the airplane and at that point, I notice that the left aileron is hanging by ONE hinge point."
Full text is here:

http://www.aero-news.net/news/sport....ntBlockID=5996
OFBSLF is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2002, 21:19
  #7 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,234
Received 52 Likes on 28 Posts
I take it back, the chap needed his BRS on this occasion.

Incidentally, if you wanted to use it on a helicopter, you'd need to lose the blades. This was done on the KA50 with explosive bolts in the hub. Use in formation not I understand particularly recommended.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2002, 00:22
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hartford, CT USA
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the reassurance of the parachute would be offset in my mind worrying about whether or not all the bolts would fire, and if they might fire uncommanded.
Barannfin is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2002, 08:55
  #9 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,234
Received 52 Likes on 28 Posts
A number of us have earned our living for a while strapped into a seat where the same applied !

From a technical viewpoint, it's an interesting problem to design an explosive actuator arrangement which is sufficiently (10^5 !) proof against inadvertent operation, and similarly guaranteed to work instantly when you want it.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2002, 20:50
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hartford, CT USA
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"interesting" is right
Barannfin is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2002, 21:11
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: US
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's the second part of the interview:

http://www.aero-news.net/news/sport....ntBlockID=6011

M1911
OFBSLF is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2002, 01:12
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: standing by my bbq
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
parachute ?? No thanks ...

A ballistic parachute might work if you forget to monitor rotor RPM, but that would be the only time I would ever see a need for it. We have the benefit of autorotation that seized-wing guys don't have. Utilizing a parachute would take control away from the pilot, leaving you to the whims of the winds and fate.

Cheers

Randy_G

Randy_g is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.