Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Helicopter crash New York City

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Helicopter crash New York City

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th April 2025 | 00:52
  #281 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 189
From: Redding CA, or on a fire somewhere
Originally Posted by Pilot DAR
The NTSB are better, and, can draw on a very broad scope of resource, and skilled people. They will get whomever they need - all skills and disciplines. That said, there are also very knowledgeable posters here, who within their discipline will have great wisdom, which they may contribute. But, the people outside the investigation will not have access to all of the information gathered until a report is issued. Thus, though they might have great knowledge, and could actually hit upon causal factors, cannot be comprehensive compared to the assigned investigators. And, there will be posters here, who simply speculate, based upon whatever they think they know about whatever. It'll be up to the readers here to sift wheat from chaff. Speculation which is way off base, and has no foundation, will usually be removed by one of the moderators, just to keep the baseline up.

In the past, I have been asked by both the NTSB, and the Canadian TSB to contribute to investigations with my specific knowledge in a related discipline. But, what I could offer was just one piece of the puzzle - it takes a team, the NTSB gathers teams really well....
I will second everything in this post and add that the NTSB is the best accident investigators in the world that I know of. They are very professional, never speculate, especially in the early stages of an investigation. Look at flight TWA 800 and the hours of research that went into that conclusion. I know there are conspiracy theories out there, but those were all rebuked in their report.
Gordy is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 02:48
  #282 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 148
Likes: 17
From: UK
Originally Posted by helispotter
dragon6172: When I play the Forbes Breaking News clip posted by Gordy in #251, I see different things when using different screens and different playback speeds. For slow playback speeds, like x0.25, you will probably see the entire body of the helicopter sometimes comes and goes or jumps. What might seem like a puff of smoke that is left behind by the helicopter (I certainly see that at some speeds and on some screens) might just be the previous position of the fuselage fading out in a following frame and might relate to a video compression processes? NTSB should have the benefit of gaining access to the original recordings.
I am inclined to agree with you 'something' is there; a part of the aircraft separating or puff of smoke? impossible to tell but fairly sure you have spotted something.
bluesideoops is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 03:16
  #283 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 316
Likes: 91
From: Honolulu
Company DO did a voluntary shut down/safety stand down. The CEO did not like that so fired him.
135 requires a DO to operate so the Feds shut them down.

Junkflyer is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 04:29
  #284 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 221
Likes: 2
From: Hampshire, UK
I read this story in the NYT, this section caught my eye; I was not aware of any abnormality in the vertical profile the aircraft recorded:



I'm aware this might just be craptacular journalism. Regain control? I didn't know there was loss of control. Apologies if already covered.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/13/n...h-escobar.html

Last edited by JamesT73J; 17th April 2025 at 04:31. Reason: Commentary, added source
JamesT73J is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 04:46
  #285 (permalink)  
Moderator
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 490
From: Melbourne
Do you have the ADSB data? That would validate this in 30 seconds.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 07:26
  #286 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 16
From: GC Paradise
Originally Posted by Squawk7700
Do you have the ADSB data? That would validate this in 30 seconds.
https://www.flightaware.com/live/fli.../91NJ/tracklog

Squawk7700 is correct...the ADS-B data looks normal...apparently just dreadful speculative journalism from NYTimes.

FlexibleResponse is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 07:54
  #287 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,371
Likes: 926
From: Den Haag
Originally Posted by FlexibleResponse
https://www.flightaware.com/live/fli.../91NJ/tracklog

Squawk7700 is correct...the ADS-B data looks normal...apparently just dreadful speculative journalism from NYTimes.
Yes it is. I like the fact that it day normally the descent is gentle but in this case he lost a whopping 500 ft in 51 seconds! 🤮
212man is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 08:01
  #288 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 385
Somebody composed some fictional eyewitness sightseeing flight story around the FR24 data and added a little flavour about "climbing" and "struggling to regain control".
Less Hair is online now  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 10:48
  #289 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
Yes, 588.23 fpm descent - how reckless
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 11:00
  #290 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 344
Likes: 105
From: Sweden
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Yes, 588.23 fpm descent - how reckless
No wonder the helicopter fell apart!

= Case closed, NTSB can go home for Easter. Thanks to NY Times for the help with this.
AAKEE is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 11:01
  #291 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,371
Likes: 926
From: Den Haag
Originally Posted by Less Hair
Somebody composed some fictional eyewitness sightseeing flight story around the FR24 data and added a little flavour about "climbing" and "struggling to regain control".
Yes, along with including "majestic", "hugging" and "Billionaires' row" (at least they got the apostrophe in the right place!)
212man is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 12:13
  #292 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Yes, 588.23 fpm descent - how reckless
I’m surprised no-one’s yet has claimed that it was on fire before it hit the water.
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 12:23
  #293 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 344
Likes: 105
From: Sweden
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
I’m surprised no-one’s yet has claimed that it was on fire before it hit the water.
we just need to wait a day or two:
https://apnews.com/article/new-york-...3d92dcbf05a28d
The helicopter was spinning uncontrollably with “a bunch of smoke coming out” before it slammed into the water, said Lesly Camacho, a hostess at a restaurant along the river in Hoboken, New Jersey.
AAKEE is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 15:21
  #294 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 221
Likes: 2
From: Hampshire, UK
Seeing the transmission and mounts largely intact, the clevis ends holding, and pulling away the underlying structure, I am so curious as to what on earth happened. That is a very strong structure, and it's been opened up and pulled apart like it's nothing.
JamesT73J is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 18:29
  #295 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,371
Likes: 926
From: Den Haag
Originally Posted by JamesT73J
Seeing the transmission and mounts largely intact, the clevis ends holding, and pulling away the underlying structure, I am so curious as to what on earth happened. That is a very strong structure, and it's been opened up and pulled apart like it's nothing.
you and many of us! Bizarre. Also so strange that in 60 years, or so, of 206 ops this seems to be a unique event.
212man is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 19:27
  #296 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 724
Likes: 40
From: Arlington, Tx. US
Originally Posted by 212man
you and many of us! Bizarre. Also so strange that in 60 years, or so, of 206 ops this seems to be a unique event.
How long have Van Horn blades been around?
The Sultan is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 19:52
  #297 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 289
From: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
Originally Posted by The Sultan
How long have Van Horn blades been around?
STC issued August 2018
IFMU is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 21:38
  #298 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 221
Likes: 2
From: Hampshire, UK
One little nugget from that NYT article was a hotlink to the FlightAware database for that Aircraft: Flight Aware log for the accident aircraft

They work those things hard. I have no idea if that's a big deal for a utility helicopter, but it seems like a lot from my casual observer's point of view. 10 flights on the day of the incident, 18 the day before. I suppose that's not very different to a flying school or the like. It's a money printer for the owner.
JamesT73J is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 22:20
  #299 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 189
From: Redding CA, or on a fire somewhere
Originally Posted by JamesT73J
They work those things hard. I have no idea if that's a big deal for a utility helicopter, but it seems like a lot from my casual observer's point of view. 10 flights on the day of the incident, 18 the day before. I suppose that's not very different to a flying school or the like. It's a money printer for the owner.
Not a big deal---most of those flights are only 20-30 minutes. When I flew tours in Hawaii, a standard day was 8 x 55 minute tours per aircraft, and we would do that year round. There were obviously slow days in there too.

In utility, it is not uncommon for my aircraft to fly 6 or 7 hours per day on revenue Hobbs which can equate to 3 or 4 hours on the collective Hobbs depending upon type of work. Hay-bombing it is common to see 11-12 hour flight days in summer.
Gordy is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2025 | 23:17
  #300 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 46
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Gordy
Not a big deal---most of those flights are only 20-30 minutes. When I flew tours in Hawaii, a standard day was 8 x 55 minute tours per aircraft, and we would do that year round. There were obviously slow days in there too.

In utility, it is not uncommon for my aircraft to fly 6 or 7 hours per day on revenue Hobbs which can equate to 3 or 4 hours on the collective Hobbs depending upon type of work. Hay-bombing it is common to see 11-12 hour flight days in summer.
Flight hours and cycles are two almost totally Independant contributors to structural damage. The Hawaii 737 is the poster child for the importance of cycles. If cycles were an issue for tour hellos, something would have popped up by now. There is another issue involved in this accident.
CLUTTER is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.