Half car, half helo
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 131
Likes: 60
From: Europe
Half car, half helo
Well, it's interesting. Could it have a market, and will this half-helo and half-car thing ever fly in the UK?
https://bepegasus.com/
Avoid imitations
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
There’s little point to this machine, other than as a design exercise. It would not comply with type approval regulations for road use so having flown an underperforming helicopter to a suitable landing site, a separate car would still be needed to complete the journey. Just like with every other helicopter already in use.
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 446
Likes: 100
From: South East Asia
How fast can you go on the ground, before the front blade folds up?
I thought helicopters hate traveling by road, all those bumps and vibration from the road damages the mast bearings in static mode.
I thought helicopters hate traveling by road, all those bumps and vibration from the road damages the mast bearings in static mode.
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 385
Most of these vehicles seem to be neither car nor aircraft. And they need a licenced pilot, not just a car driver, to be flown. This excludes most of the huge car driver population. Flight operations in many countries are legally limited to airports or airfields where you could rent both a proper aircraft or car whenever the need arises. Just revving up the rotor to escape your traffic jam like in your dreams doesn't seem to work in real life.
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 153
Likes: 90
From: Finland
https://www.designboom.com/technolog...ve-06-16-2017/
I've seen those on the road and in the air, so why not a helicopter? But it's not a real car, maybe a scooter with a roof would describe it more accurately.
I've seen those on the road and in the air, so why not a helicopter? But it's not a real car, maybe a scooter with a roof would describe it more accurately.
Joined: Dec 2015
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 867
Likes: 672
From: Budapest
https://www.designboom.com/technolog...ve-06-16-2017/
I've seen those on the road and in the air, so why not a helicopter? But it's not a real car, maybe a scooter with a roof would describe it more accurately.
I've seen those on the road and in the air, so why not a helicopter? But it's not a real car, maybe a scooter with a roof would describe it more accurately.
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 37
From: N/A
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 224
Likes: 113
From: UK
It looks like it's no longer than the average transit van, so cornering shouldn't be an issue. As for certification and licensing for use in the air, would it, or need it, be any different to an autogyro? Certification for road use could be more problematic and, I imagine that getting joint certification would result in normal civil service rivalry and therefore never happen.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 131
Likes: 60
From: Europe
I am thinking of emergency services. An 80kg pilot gives a payload of 21kg, a defib unit, various drugs, and bits and pieces for use in remote areas that a normal ambulance would struggle to get to and would arrive before an air ambulance can attend. Again, this depends on costs but maybe based at small remote clinics.
Last edited by DroneDog; 20th June 2024 at 16:53.
Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,672
Likes: 3,317
From: Everett, WA
I've said this about 'flying cars' - but it applies equally to 'helo cars'.
The needs of a good car and something that flies are dramatically different and fundamentally incompatible. You can build a good car, or you can build a good airplane/helo. But as soon as you try to combine them, you're going to end up with something that is so horribly compromised that it's going to suck at both being a car and an aircraft - and something costs as much as a good car and good aircraft combined...
The needs of a good car and something that flies are dramatically different and fundamentally incompatible. You can build a good car, or you can build a good airplane/helo. But as soon as you try to combine them, you're going to end up with something that is so horribly compromised that it's going to suck at both being a car and an aircraft - and something costs as much as a good car and good aircraft combined...
Joined: Dec 2015
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 867
Likes: 672
From: Budapest
Joined: Dec 2017
Aviation Qualifications: SLF
Posts: 977
Likes: 706
From: Yakima
It looks like it's no longer than the average transit van, so cornering shouldn't be an issue. As for certification and licensing for use in the air, would it, or need it, be any different to an autogyro? Certification for road use could be more problematic and, I imagine that getting joint certification would result in normal civil service rivalry and therefore never happen.
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 327
Likes: 40
From: Melbourne, Australia
I saw this thing on the ground at the Avalon Airshow and it looked impressive and stuff, but for a long time I have had this 'vision' that any kind of 'compact' air / road vehicle able to be used to 'commute' or used around population centres and around people often would have some kind of ducted powerplant to dramatically increase safety but I understand such systems are very inefficient compared to open-air rotors / props. The Lithium design seems to be a good approach but it has those big wings.
I imagine an airframe-mounted parachute or some kind of pop-out airbag balloon could provide a degree of safety in the case of an engine failure but would increase the weight too much. (In the movie Blade Runner 2049 the Spinner had some kind of burst of air to cushion the touchdown at the last moment which was interesting.)
The other thing is flying it... I've thought by this time we could implement a flight control system which is essentially an autopilot, or dare I say some kind of AI, which keeps the aircraft stable at all times for you, and simply does for you what you command it to do.
I imagine an airframe-mounted parachute or some kind of pop-out airbag balloon could provide a degree of safety in the case of an engine failure but would increase the weight too much. (In the movie Blade Runner 2049 the Spinner had some kind of burst of air to cushion the touchdown at the last moment which was interesting.)
The other thing is flying it... I've thought by this time we could implement a flight control system which is essentially an autopilot, or dare I say some kind of AI, which keeps the aircraft stable at all times for you, and simply does for you what you command it to do.
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 647
Likes: 19
From: East side of OZ
Imagine the peak/rush hour with hundreds of these things buzzing around all trying to get there first! What a clusterfvk that would be. Throw in some bad weather or the darkness of night and it will get real messy real quickly.
You only have to look at the road toll or the newly qualified private pilot toll to realise that this will never happen on a large scale and very few people that would buy these vehicles would be bothered to get a commercial licence or do any sort of training.
I remember as a kid, 60+ years ago, there was talk then about flying cars to relieve road congestion. Ha! It ain't happened yet.
Cheers,
BH.
You only have to look at the road toll or the newly qualified private pilot toll to realise that this will never happen on a large scale and very few people that would buy these vehicles would be bothered to get a commercial licence or do any sort of training.
I remember as a kid, 60+ years ago, there was talk then about flying cars to relieve road congestion. Ha! It ain't happened yet.
Cheers,
BH.
