Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Army?s newest Apache blown over at Middle Wallop

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Army’s newest Apache blown over at Middle Wallop

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd January 2024 | 21:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,137
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
Army’s newest Apache blown over at Middle Wallop










​​​​The British Army’s newest Apache helicopter was blown over in high winds as Storm Henk hit southern Britain.

The Apache AH-64E attack helicopter, declared “ready for front line duty” by the Army in October, was knocked onto its side while stationary at the Army Aviation Centre in Middle Wallop, Hampshire.

It is understood no one was injured during the incident, and that all other aircraft remained undamaged. An Army ambulance was pictured at the scene earlier on Tuesday afternoon.

A defence source told The Telegraph it is believed to have been the first time that an Apache has been blown over, adding: “Apaches aren’t particularly prone to it, but if the wind speed is high enough it can obviously happen.”

Apaches are considered robust aircraft proven to operate from the decks of ships, and are typically able to withstand strong winds.

However, the source said it was possible for “any aircraft” to be blown over, explaining: “They’ve got lifting surfaces for a reason, but it does mean they can be vulnerable to high winds.”

An Army spokesman said: “We are aware of an incident at Army Aviation Centre Middle Wallop, where an Apache helicopter has been destabilised by very high winds.

“Airfield staff responded rapidly to secure the aircraft and specialist recovery is currently being coordinated. We will not comment further until a full assessment has been made.”


https://uk.news.yahoo.com/army-newes...wLLtNAej_NbTpb

NutLoose is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2024 | 21:54
  #2 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 56
From: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
OK, so now I understand why none of these are stationed in Scotland.
jimf671 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2024 | 23:32
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 367
Likes: 7
From: Land of the Angles
I have to say I was a little puzzled to read of this incident, in what turned out to be the windiest day this winter so far, in this region of Wiltshire, and there were plenty of severe weather warnings in place.

I am currently residing in a large forest, surrounded by tall trees, about 20 miles north of MW, and although there have been plenty of gales these past few weeks, today’s winds and gusts in this area were noticeably more violent than at any time this past month. So much so, I was concerned enough to vacate my home for several hours at lunchtime and moved my cars away from the trees into open ground.

Today’s weather was a far cry from that found in the ‘Roaring Forties’ for sure, but if I cast my memory back many moons ago to my time at PSC, it was common practice for the engineers to tie-down the Chinooks when out in the open and the winds picked up more than usual.
Hilife is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd January 2024 | 08:48
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
Someone will be having an interview without coffee and biscuits methinks...........
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd January 2024 | 12:43
  #5 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 9,337
Likes: 2,185
From: Texas
At least only one was blown over.
In Fort Hood, back in 1989, there were about a hundred blown over. I remember seeing pictures in the news of dozens of helicopters rolled over on their sides.

Ft. Hood Storm Damage $600 Million

L.A. TIMES ARCHIVES | MAY 20, 1989 12 AM PT | FROM ASSOCIATED PRESS
Storm damage to helicopters and buildings at the Army’s Ft. Hood outside Killeen, Tex., will cost at least $600 million to repair, the service said Friday. The Army said it had so far pegged last week’s storm damage to almost 200 helicopters at $585 million. Damage to buildings and other facilities was put at $15 million. Lt. Col. John Chapla, an Army spokesman, said exact repair figures are not available.

The storm, packing heavy rain and winds of 95 m.p.h., ravaged the area May 13. Although no one was killed, the storm forced 25 military families from their quarters and damaged the helicopters and at least 20% of the fort’s buildings. The damage occurred even though the Army said about half of the helicopters had been placed inside hangars as the storm approached and the remainder were tied down. Especially hard hit was the new fleet of AH-64 Apache attack helicopters. About 100 of the fort’s 150 Apaches were reported damaged, forcing the base to downgrade its state of aviation readiness.
Ft. Hood Storm Damage $600 Million - Los Angeles Times (latimes.com)
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd January 2024 | 12:50
  #6 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 444
Likes: 83
From: Alles Über
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Someone will be having an interview without coffee and biscuits methinks...........
DA FAiR has been completed before the investigation? Impressive efficiency.
trim it out is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd January 2024 | 13:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 178
Likes: 123
From: Southern United States
“A defence source told The Telegraph it is believed to have been the first time that an Apache has been blown over, adding: “Apaches aren’t particularly prone to it, but if the wind speed is high enough it can obviously happen.”

I’m assuming they mean, “First time an Apace was blown over” in UK service. As referenced in another post this even happened in 1989:

This event made a big impact on the US Army, when I began working on AH-64As back in 2001 the importance of proper aircraft mooring was stressed using this even as an example. Heck, we can’t even take a 30 minute lunch brake on a clear calm day and leave the aircraft unchained and untied.

Of course, I don’t know that you could truly be prepared for events of the magnitude of the one in 1989, but I’ve seen more unmoored aircraft damaged or tipped over in severe weather than ones that had blades properly secured and chains securing the airframe.

At any rate, sad to see such damage, glad no one was injured.

FltMech
60FltMech is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd January 2024 | 13:51
  #8 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 2,378
Likes: 881
From: Canada
My first thought…did the blades perhaps start to windmill? That will do it.
albatross is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd January 2024 | 14:35
  #9 (permalink)  
Community Builder
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 1,155
From: Central UK
Why would it not have been hangagred with gales forcast?
That's seriously dim.
meleagertoo is online now  
Reply
Old 3rd January 2024 | 16:42
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2008
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 36
Likes: 1
From: North of East, South of West
Attempting to fly on 2nd Jan when a high wind/storm warning for the majority of UK has been issued-someone was desperate to fly, why? Or is the course that far behind?
It'll be interesting to hear the explanation of the thought/decision making process behind this.
Agreed someone is due an interview without coffee, biscuits, rank slides and future pension contributions.
Squat switch is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd January 2024 | 19:48
  #11 (permalink)  
LRP
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 226
Likes: 25
From: Arizona

This works really well.
LRP is offline  
Reply
Old 4th January 2024 | 03:23
  #12 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 880
Likes: 225
From: Australia
Part of the article by NutLoose reported: "Apaches are considered robust aircraft proven to operate from the decks of ships, and are typically able to withstand strong winds".

That is all well and good if they are lashed to a deck, or in this case to any tie-down points in the tarmac. I assume this one wasn't lashed down?

The Apache doesn't have a particularly wide wheel base and probably has a reasonably high CG combined with a fair bit of lateral windage area and hence overturning moment. So left unsecured, I suspect it would topple in lower wind speeds than various other helicopter types, no matter how "robust" it may be.

I wonder how much contribution of the wind blowing over rotors has to the total overturning moment? I assume it is normal practice to park helicopters with collective in a 'neutral' position??
helispotter is offline  
Reply
Old 4th January 2024 | 17:46
  #13 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 414
Likes: 42
From: South West
Originally Posted by LRP

This works really well.

Sure about that?
gipsymagpie is offline  
Reply
Old 4th January 2024 | 21:10
  #14 (permalink)  
LRP
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 226
Likes: 25
From: Arizona
It ain't laying on its side.
LRP is offline  
Reply
Old 5th January 2024 | 20:49
  #15 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 880
Likes: 225
From: Australia
Originally Posted by LRP
It ain't laying on its side.
But an expensive repair, even if it didn't roll on its side. I was surprised to see the tie-down points on the Apache are so low down on the fuselage, one on the underside of tail boom, others seemingly low and forward of main gear. That may be ok to stop forwards and aft or lateral movement, but doesn't seem very effective at resisting a rolling moment.

I can't imagine the blades were 'snapped' by wind alone, the helicopter in that screen shot must have been rocking a lot.

Watching the rest of the video, I also wonder how much more damage was incurred when they lifted some of the helicopters upright again, sometimes seemingly just using a sling around the rotor.
helispotter is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.