Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Army’s newest Apache blown over at Middle Wallop

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Army’s newest Apache blown over at Middle Wallop

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jan 2024, 21:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,937
Received 2,851 Likes on 1,219 Posts
Army’s newest Apache blown over at Middle Wallop










​​​​The British Army’s newest Apache helicopter was blown over in high winds as Storm Henk hit southern Britain.

The Apache AH-64E attack helicopter, declared “ready for front line duty” by the Army in October, was knocked onto its side while stationary at the Army Aviation Centre in Middle Wallop, Hampshire.

It is understood no one was injured during the incident, and that all other aircraft remained undamaged. An Army ambulance was pictured at the scene earlier on Tuesday afternoon.

A defence source told The Telegraph it is believed to have been the first time that an Apache has been blown over, adding: “Apaches aren’t particularly prone to it, but if the wind speed is high enough it can obviously happen.”

Apaches are considered robust aircraft proven to operate from the decks of ships, and are typically able to withstand strong winds.

However, the source said it was possible for “any aircraft” to be blown over, explaining: “They’ve got lifting surfaces for a reason, but it does mean they can be vulnerable to high winds.”

An Army spokesman said: “We are aware of an incident at Army Aviation Centre Middle Wallop, where an Apache helicopter has been destabilised by very high winds.

“Airfield staff responded rapidly to secure the aircraft and specialist recovery is currently being coordinated. We will not comment further until a full assessment has been made.”


https://uk.news.yahoo.com/army-newes...wLLtNAej_NbTpb

NutLoose is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2024, 21:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
Posts: 1,460
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
OK, so now I understand why none of these are stationed in Scotland.
jimf671 is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2024, 23:32
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Land of the Angles
Posts: 359
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I have to say I was a little puzzled to read of this incident, in what turned out to be the windiest day this winter so far, in this region of Wiltshire, and there were plenty of severe weather warnings in place.

I am currently residing in a large forest, surrounded by tall trees, about 20 miles north of MW, and although there have been plenty of gales these past few weeks, today’s winds and gusts in this area were noticeably more violent than at any time this past month. So much so, I was concerned enough to vacate my home for several hours at lunchtime and moved my cars away from the trees into open ground.

Today’s weather was a far cry from that found in the ‘Roaring Forties’ for sure, but if I cast my memory back many moons ago to my time at PSC, it was common practice for the engineers to tie-down the Chinooks when out in the open and the winds picked up more than usual.
Hilife is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2024, 08:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,329
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Someone will be having an interview without coffee and biscuits methinks...........
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by [email protected]:
Old 3rd Jan 2024, 12:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,201
Received 401 Likes on 248 Posts
At least only one was blown over.
In Fort Hood, back in 1989, there were about a hundred blown over. I remember seeing pictures in the news of dozens of helicopters rolled over on their sides.

Ft. Hood Storm Damage $600 Million

L.A. TIMES ARCHIVES | MAY 20, 1989 12 AM PT | FROM ASSOCIATED PRESS
Storm damage to helicopters and buildings at the Army’s Ft. Hood outside Killeen, Tex., will cost at least $600 million to repair, the service said Friday. The Army said it had so far pegged last week’s storm damage to almost 200 helicopters at $585 million. Damage to buildings and other facilities was put at $15 million. Lt. Col. John Chapla, an Army spokesman, said exact repair figures are not available.

The storm, packing heavy rain and winds of 95 m.p.h., ravaged the area May 13. Although no one was killed, the storm forced 25 military families from their quarters and damaged the helicopters and at least 20% of the fort’s buildings. The damage occurred even though the Army said about half of the helicopters had been placed inside hangars as the storm approached and the remainder were tied down. Especially hard hit was the new fleet of AH-64 Apache attack helicopters. About 100 of the fort’s 150 Apaches were reported damaged, forcing the base to downgrade its state of aviation readiness.
Ft. Hood Storm Damage $600 Million - Los Angeles Times (latimes.com)
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2024, 12:50
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Alles Über
Posts: 377
Received 42 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Someone will be having an interview without coffee and biscuits methinks...........
DA FAiR has been completed before the investigation? Impressive efficiency.
trim it out is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2024, 13:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Southern United States
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 30 Posts
“A defence source told The Telegraph it is believed to have been the first time that an Apache has been blown over, adding: “Apaches aren’t particularly prone to it, but if the wind speed is high enough it can obviously happen.”

I’m assuming they mean, “First time an Apace was blown over” in UK service. As referenced in another post this even happened in 1989:

This event made a big impact on the US Army, when I began working on AH-64As back in 2001 the importance of proper aircraft mooring was stressed using this even as an example. Heck, we can’t even take a 30 minute lunch brake on a clear calm day and leave the aircraft unchained and untied.

Of course, I don’t know that you could truly be prepared for events of the magnitude of the one in 1989, but I’ve seen more unmoored aircraft damaged or tipped over in severe weather than ones that had blades properly secured and chains securing the airframe.

At any rate, sad to see such damage, glad no one was injured.

FltMech
60FltMech is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2024, 13:51
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,747
Received 152 Likes on 76 Posts
My first thought…did the blades perhaps start to windmill? That will do it.
albatross is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2024, 14:35
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Central UK
Posts: 1,625
Received 135 Likes on 64 Posts
Why would it not have been hangagred with gales forcast?
That's seriously dim.
meleagertoo is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2024, 16:42
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North of East, South of West
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Attempting to fly on 2nd Jan when a high wind/storm warning for the majority of UK has been issued-someone was desperate to fly, why? Or is the course that far behind?
It'll be interesting to hear the explanation of the thought/decision making process behind this.
Agreed someone is due an interview without coffee, biscuits, rank slides and future pension contributions.
Squat switch is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 3rd Jan 2024, 19:48
  #11 (permalink)  
LRP
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts

This works really well.
LRP is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by LRP:
Old 4th Jan 2024, 03:23
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 304
Received 41 Likes on 33 Posts
Part of the article by NutLoose reported: "Apaches are considered robust aircraft proven to operate from the decks of ships, and are typically able to withstand strong winds".

That is all well and good if they are lashed to a deck, or in this case to any tie-down points in the tarmac. I assume this one wasn't lashed down?

The Apache doesn't have a particularly wide wheel base and probably has a reasonably high CG combined with a fair bit of lateral windage area and hence overturning moment. So left unsecured, I suspect it would topple in lower wind speeds than various other helicopter types, no matter how "robust" it may be.

I wonder how much contribution of the wind blowing over rotors has to the total overturning moment? I assume it is normal practice to park helicopters with collective in a 'neutral' position??
helispotter is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2024, 17:46
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: South West
Posts: 296
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by LRP

This works really well.

Sure about that?
gipsymagpie is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2024, 21:10
  #14 (permalink)  
LRP
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
It ain't laying on its side.
LRP is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2024, 20:49
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 304
Received 41 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by LRP
It ain't laying on its side.
But an expensive repair, even if it didn't roll on its side. I was surprised to see the tie-down points on the Apache are so low down on the fuselage, one on the underside of tail boom, others seemingly low and forward of main gear. That may be ok to stop forwards and aft or lateral movement, but doesn't seem very effective at resisting a rolling moment.

I can't imagine the blades were 'snapped' by wind alone, the helicopter in that screen shot must have been rocking a lot.

Watching the rest of the video, I also wonder how much more damage was incurred when they lifted some of the helicopters upright again, sometimes seemingly just using a sling around the rotor.
helispotter is offline  
The following users liked this post:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.