Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Helicopter Jobs 2023

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Helicopter Jobs 2023

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Jul 2023, 11:58
  #61 (permalink)  
Tightgit
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The artist formerly known as john du'pruyting
Age: 65
Posts: 804
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
"The I.R. in the police role is dangerous,"

Brutal. You would have made a great senior Officer in the RFC during the first world war. 'We can't give the men parachutes, they might bale out at the first sign of conflict"!

(Actually not a true reason they didn't have parachutes but who doesn't like a bit of fake history to spice things up).

Anyway, an IR in the police role is NOT dangerous.
An IR in the police role without adequate training, a suitable policy for flight in IMC and the correct aircraft might be considered dangerous, but having an IR in the police role is most definitely not dangerous.
That is not to say that it should be a pre-requisite for police flying, not having one can be mitigated for by policy and procedures but we're well into the 21st century and there are far more capable aircraft (and pilots) in the fleet now, than there were back in the growth period of police aviation in the 90's. So if the role can be enhanced operationally or made safer by the use of Instrument qualified pilots and aircraft then within sensible (whatever they are), budgetary constraints, that ought to be a target.
handysnaks is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2023, 12:09
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
But there are a reasonable number of purely civilian trained pilots flying around the UK at the moment whose training requirement (should they want to join NPAS), would be no more or less that than an ex military pilot.
Which civilian roles (other than AA/HEMS) would be using NVD? That is a sizeable training burden where mil pilots have a big advantage.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2023, 12:33
  #63 (permalink)  
Tightgit
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The artist formerly known as john du'pruyting
Age: 65
Posts: 804
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
"Which civilian roles (other than AA/HEMS) would be using NVD? That is a sizeable training burden where mil pilots have a big advantage."

Well none as far as I know crab.
On the other hand if NPAS want pilots with an I/R then, if a civilian pilot has one and an ex-military pilot doesn't then that is a sizeable burden where the civ pilots (obviously assuming they have I/Rs), have a big advantage.

Anyway, as much fun as point scoring tennis is, the aim here isn't to try and shoot down all of your points. Intuitively a military pilot would seem a natural fit for the police role and generally (but definitely not exhaustively), that turns out to be the case. Fortunately for both NPAS, military pilots and civilian pilots, they don't have you or I deciding on who gets in, so the whole discussion is rather academic. Either way for those who get to do it, I'm sure it is still a rewarding, interesting and sometimes challenging job.
handysnaks is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2023, 14:53
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
On the other hand if NPAS want pilots with an I/R then, if a civilian pilot has one and an ex-military pilot doesn't then that is a sizeable burden where the civ pilots (obviously assuming they have I/Rs), have a big advantage.
Which was the point of my original post - NPAS seem to want mil pilots for reasons we agree on but if they insist on an IR it is the pilot who pays for it and not NPAS so there is no training burden just a £20K outlay in order to get a job where I think we agree an IR isn't strictly needed.​​​​​​​
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2023, 05:11
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Holland
Age: 48
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Victoria Police, Australia- AW139 Single Pilot job

It's a bit late posting but I've only just seen it. There is still over 24hrs to apply.

http://www.seek.com.au/job/68679407?...c37016703f685d
UNS-1D is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2023, 06:39
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 900
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
The initial stipulation made by the (then) JAA Operations Committee to include (regular) instrument training in the competencies was in mitigation for the expected exposure to bad weather conditions that were likely in the role

The subject of the instrument rating was introduced and almost immediately discounted for the very reasons discussed in this thread - not just for the unwarranted expense (in time and resources) but because of the additional level of equipment that would be required for single-pilot operations on the types in use (avoidance of two-pilot operations was a factor).

Those on the committee who had, and had used, their instrument ratings (a surprisingly high number) were acutely aware of the perishable nature of a competence that it might never have to be used because it was more about procedures than handling skills.

The introduction of the technical crew member was also a mitigating factor in the discussion. In fact, more time was spent on this subject than the rating.


JimL is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2023, 09:16
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: manchester
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

feathering tickles is online now  
Old 26th Oct 2023, 00:54
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,951
Received 397 Likes on 210 Posts
You would have made a great senior Officer in the RFC during the first world war. 'We can't give the men parachutes, they might bale out at the first sign of conflict"!

(Actually not a true reason they didn't have parachutes but who doesn't like a bit of fake history to spice things up)
The Germans started issuing pilots with parachutes in early 1918, the first "save" being on 1st April when Vizefeldwebel Weimar jumped clear of his stricken Albatros DVa. In late June Leutnants Helmut Steinbrecher and Ernst Udet likewise floated safely to the ground beneath their Heinecke chutes. An estimated some 70 or so German crew bailed out but one third of those died for various reasons, the British began issuing chutes in September 1918.




Back to regular scheduling.

Last edited by megan; 26th Oct 2023 at 01:13.
megan is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2023, 23:46
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Wild West... and Oz
Posts: 866
Received 9 Likes on 2 Posts
Air Chateau

Anyone have info on this company?
https://airchateau.aero/

They are advertising for H125/A109 pilots.
BigMike is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.