Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Puma confirmed for Cyprus and Brunei

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Puma confirmed for Cyprus and Brunei

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th January 2022 | 18:04
  #21 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 444
Likes: 83
From: Alles Über
Originally Posted by Bolso
I think one important point is that the MOD haven't chosen the Puma, they've been forced to find a replacement with Draken choosing to end all of it's rotary wing business, I think they're making a reasonable best of a less than ideal scenario.
I agree they've had their hand forced, but that is down to their own dealing. Slightly naive perhaps to have assumed a private company would have extended a poorly performing contract out of the goodness of their hearts.
Originally Posted by Bolso
A question I haven't seen answered yet is hangarage in Brunei. The shed out there is only really suitable for 212's, I'd be surprised if a/three Puma(s) would fit. A year isn't very long to negotiate with local government and build a new facility, especially as I doubt they'd want to waste funds and resources on a new facility for the current operation with a different aircraft, only to change to a new aircraft and probably a new operation structure within approx 10 years.
RIMBA has some big hangars, might just have to do some of that diplomacy stuff with the DA.
trim it out is offline  
Reply
Old 27th January 2022 | 23:59
  #22 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,373
Likes: 931
From: Den Haag
Originally Posted by trim it out
I agree they've had their hand forced, but that is down to their own dealing. Slightly naive perhaps to have assumed a private company would have extended a poorly performing contract out of the goodness of their hearts.

RIMBA has some big hangars, might just have to do some of that diplomacy stuff with the DA.
yes - obvious solution. Lots of huge hangars with no occupants
212man is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2022 | 11:45
  #23 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 448
Likes: 7
From: Sometimes here, sometimes there
I wonder if the Singapore AF still have their detachment at Bandar?

They used to occupy the NE corner of the field. It might provide some very nice hangarage and accommodation of a suitable size?
Variable Load is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.