Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

H145 makes forced landing

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

H145 makes forced landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Dec 2021, 21:15
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: South West
Posts: 297
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by RVDT
for helicopters with IBF installed:

Flights in falling or blowing snow shall be prohibited

Flights at or below 5 °C OAT when visible moisture is present shall be avoided. Visible moisture can be precipitation (snow, sleet, ice crystals) or fog/cloud reducing the visibility below 800 m.
Now there's some wonderfully ambiguous English. Does the 800m refer only to fog/cloud or also to precipitation? And noting rain is not in the list of precipitation.

IBF out please!
gipsymagpie is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2021, 22:56
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sweden
Age: 56
Posts: 224
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Never heard of an 'anti-ice filter' as part of a fuel system - heat exchangers to cool oil with fuel or heat fuel with oil yes - just how would this 'anti-ice filter' work as part of the fuel system?
Its not that unusual, as leas not in chilly climates. Maybe the formal name might be different (like airframe fuel filter or something like that), but the ”go by name” is ice filter as the main purpose is to trap ice. We have them on the Swedish NH90 (not standard in all NH90 but a option) and we did have them on our AS332M1.

Probably a bit off topic in this case though, as it seems like its the Inlet Barrier Filter that is the issue here
AAKEE is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2021, 11:02
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,850
Received 57 Likes on 38 Posts
AHD may have a little logistic issue with this.

Not all aircraft with IBF's are fitted with the "fixed parts" to allow removal of the filters and fit the blanking plates.

It is listed in the SB to retrofit the IBF's with the covers as an "optional part" and listed in the IPC but there was no facility to install it. i.e. Service Bulletin.

They have just released an SB as of today the 9th of December but no listing of the kit price. Why it isn't part of the original IBF kit is beyond me. It is offered as a "product improvement" which is a euphemism for "oops" to "save face" or "Gesicht wahren" maybe depending on where you are standing at the time.

As a spare part the list price is EUR 6775.14 per side with a lead time of 7 months! Some serious margin there in the "cost recovery" and so much for this winter then?

Looks like a flat piece of Alclad and an Alclad frame, 26 odd screws and corresponding bunch of nutplates. My guess is the total material cost might be EUR 200.00 max and I think I could make them myself in about 4 hours!

The SB says it takes about 10 hours to complete the installation.

At the time we purchased an H145 it was not offered or listed and operationally if you have an issue with a filter you would be grounded without having the option to remove the filter and continue operating.

No doubt the filters are well worth it for the added protection to the operation of the engines but I feel that someone has not really thought this through on the operational side at AHD.

Personally I think the kit should be included as part of the original IBF install SB as it would make sense to incorporate it at the time of installation and the retrofit offered as a "commercial incentive" i.e. FOC.

Just spitballing as we do here but I think a few folks may have a case.



RVDT is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2021, 12:37
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,949
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 26 Posts
Crab

Pretty common to see anti ice filters on 500's fuel systems. Installed between fuel tank and engine driven fuel pump
Hughes500 is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2021, 15:11
  #25 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,578
Received 435 Likes on 229 Posts
Originally Posted by RVDT
No airframe filter on 135 or 145 or 350 (standard) or H500 (standard) for that matter and possibly not originally on B206.

They were initially fitted to older aircraft without fuel/oil heaters on the engine. Theory being if there was ice in the fuel you would get impending bypass indication as a pre-warning.

Plus it allowed operation at lower temps without FSII. FSII is nasty stuff.
Agusta seem to have this better thought out. The fuel filters are heated by the engine oil, so that fuel with FSII isn’t required.
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 9th Dec 2021, 18:49
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,850
Received 57 Likes on 38 Posts
Agusta seem to have this better thought out. The fuel filters are heated by the engine oil, so that fuel with FSII isn’t required.
Interesting. Only familiar with the PWC powered 109 and a bit on the139. The 109 definitely doesn't have a heated filter and pretty sure the PT6 powered 139 doesn't either as the FMM is basically the same.

They both do have fuel/oil heat exchangers on the accessory gearbox but the engine fuel filter is part of the FMM.
RVDT is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2021, 19:09
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did Airbus not do the falling and blowing snow certification for the IBF?
retoocs is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2021, 19:23
  #28 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,578
Received 435 Likes on 229 Posts
RVDT,

I think you are correct; I was thinking of the Sikorsky S76. Too many types in my logbook and old age creeping in.

However, the later Agusta 109s with the PW207C engines have an anti-ice airframe filter and don’t need FSII.
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 9th Dec 2021, 21:13
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,850
Received 57 Likes on 38 Posts
Did Airbus not do the falling and blowing snow certification for the IBF?
"snow" is a fairly broad generalisation. There are vastly different types.

I spent some time talking to I think it was the guys from Dart at AHI in Grand Prairie TX who had just completed FAA certification on the filter for the AS350B3.

They had been up in Canada and it is actually pretty involved and difficult.

Maybe AHD used the "wrong type of snow"
RVDT is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2021, 22:31
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RVDT
"snow" is a fairly broad generalisation. There are vastly different types.

I spent some time talking to I think it was the guys from Dart at AHI in Grand Prairie TX who had just completed FAA certification on the filter for the AS350B3.

They had been up in Canada and it is actually pretty involved and difficult.

Maybe AHD used the "wrong type of snow"
The FAA requires the warm wet snow -4 to 1°C, 1/4 mile visibility, 20 minutes on the ground, 5 minutes IGE, 1 hour flying max safe speed (as fast as you dare in essentially zero visibility). There's also the cold dry snow test, which I think Transport Canada is pushing. Either test requires a good meteorologist and lots of sitting around waiting for the right conditions.

Sikorsky with the S-76 C++ ended up doing both the warm wet snow and the cold dry snow in its certification of the IBF.
retoocs is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2021, 06:28
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: South West
Posts: 297
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
The BK117 (including C2 and D2 with IBF) were certified to FAR29 so those exact conditions in accordance with AC-29 29.1093 would have been used.

Which the crew in question exceeded in the incident from my understanding. I think they were on the ground running for significantly longer than 20 mins.
gipsymagpie is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2021, 17:03
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How different/similar is the BK117 engine installation to the H145, same or different engines?
papiro58km is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2021, 19:50
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,850
Received 57 Likes on 38 Posts
BK117 A1,A3, A4, B1, B2 - Honeywell (Lycoming) LTS 101 in various flavours 650B1, 750B1.

BK117 C1 - Arriel 1E2
BK117 C2, C2e (EC145) - Arriel 1E2

BK117 D2 (H145) Arriel 2E
BK117 D3 (H145 5 blade) Arriel 2E

Arriel Versions all pretty much the same in the inlet depending with or without IBF.
RVDT is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2021, 10:55
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: NW
Posts: 143
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by RVDT

It is listed in the SB to retrofit the IBF's with the covers as an "optional part" and listed in the IPC but there was no facility to install it. i.e. Service Bulletin.

They have just released an SB as of today the 9th of December but no listing of the kit price. Why it isn't part of the original IBF kit is beyond me. It is offered as a "product improvement" which is a euphemism for "oops" to "save face" or "Gesicht wahren" maybe depending on where you are standing at the time.
Not true. It was supplied as optional to the original kit since the beginning. SB is for those that never opt for that option to implement it standalone as some CAMO insist you cannot do partial SB even you already have most of it
Mee3 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.