Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

AW169 AW139 with real OEI landing

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

AW169 AW139 with real OEI landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Nov 2021, 09:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AW169 AW139 with real OEI landing

Hello Everybody,

There is one thing I have been discussing with a collegue:

The MPM of AW169 and AW139 mention lifetime penalty factors for CAT.A training mode.

Do you know the lifetime penalty for real OEI, or even real Autorotation? Is there any effect, as long no limit is exceeded?

MeddlMoe is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2021, 18:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: N/A
Age: 47
Posts: 150
Received 27 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by MeddlMoe
Hello Everybody,

There is one thing I have been discussing with a collegue:

The MPM of AW169 and AW139 mention lifetime penalty factors for CAT.A training mode.

Do you know the lifetime penalty for real OEI, or even real Autorotation? Is there any effect, as long no limit is exceeded?
Strange… then why a „Training Mode“ H135/145 don’t have these issues as far as I know.
casper64 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2021, 21:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: HLS map - http://goo.gl/maps/3ymt
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MeddlMoe
Hello Everybody,

There is one thing I have been discussing with a collegue:

The MPM of AW169 and AW139 mention lifetime penalty factors for CAT.A training mode.

Do you know the lifetime penalty for real OEI, or even real Autorotation? Is there any effect, as long no limit is exceeded?
Frustratingly it is not the time spent in training mode either, but the whole flight duration if training mode was used 🤷🏼‍♂️ What’s equally odd is that both engines are operating delivering equal torque (governed to 77%), so there is no large asymmetrical torque applied through the gearbox. Are the penalty factors due to stresses from flight at low Nr?

Not aware of a penalty for genuine OEI, but as it is forbidden by the RFM to place an ENG MODE switch to IDLE/OFF for OEI training I guess they don’t expect you to spend much time there, whereas training mode might be used extensively.
Aucky is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2021, 07:09
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On the green bit near the blue wobbly stuff
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not just the stresses from the low Nr, but also remember the very sudden Nr acceleration you get if the Nr droops too low, and the OEI training mode drops out.
Non-PC Plod is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2021, 07:20
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: HLS map - http://goo.gl/maps/3ymt
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Non-PC Plod
Not just the stresses from the low Nr, but also remember the very sudden Nr acceleration you get if the Nr droops too low, and the OEI training mode drops out.
No doubt this puts significant stress on the freewheels and gearbox if it is allowed to get all the way to the 88% cut out (usually with an associated XMSN OVTQ caption unless on the ground). It would seem unfair to apply this as a penalty to every use of training mode given the rarity of it occurring, but you’re probably right. It’s a little like how they penalise the entire duration of a flight at TOW above 4.6t (169), even if it was only >4.6t for the first 5 minutes.
Aucky is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2021, 07:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On the green bit near the blue wobbly stuff
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
With unknowns, its always safest to use the worst case scenario - so assume it happens every time.
Non-PC Plod is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2021, 18:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,349
Received 635 Likes on 277 Posts
To my knowledge, the later 139s trg mode just adjusted the display figures rather than actually backing off an engine - that should mean no penalties. You have all the MFD indications of an engine failure but without the mechanical problems.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.