Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

S-64 attacked in Chile

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

S-64 attacked in Chile

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Mar 2020, 02:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
S-64 attacked in Chile

Photos from FB, apparently eco terrorists attacked and set off a firebomb in a Chile based Erickson S64F Aircrane "Camille".

A statement attributed to Erickson said:

A group of unidentified individuals entered an Erickson operating base in Chile last night. After gaining entry to the secure area, they caused damage to the Erickson owned S-64 Air CraneŽ helicopter located there. No Erickson employees were hurt. Erickson personnel are cooperating with local police.

We have no further information to share at this time.













John Eacott is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 03:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lower Troposphere
Posts: 55
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eco terrorists? You mean people that care about the environment? Can you elaborate or just stirring the pot?
Vandals for sure...but the Erickson statement doesn't mention Eco terrorists.
Shame that anyone would do that to a crane.
blackdog7 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 03:37
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by blackdog7
Eco terrorists? You mean people that care about the environment? Can you elaborate or just stirring the pot?
Vandals for sure...but the Erickson statement doesn't mention Eco terrorists.
Shame that anyone would do that to a crane.
Put away your outrage and read what I said: ‘apparently eco terrorists’.

Based on a first hand report from an Erickson employee at the site during the attack, the perpetrators apparently believed the Crane to be involved in logging ops.

Not much caring for the environment involved in this criminal activity, regardless of who did it.
John Eacott is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 07:17
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
They burnt some FAASA Spain Augusta A119 Koalas about three years ago.
N707ZS is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 10:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Blue planet
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They are no Eco-Terrorists.....

They are native poplation who are fighting against the government to regain control of they´re lands.

This is the reason why some pilots doing firefighting use bulletproof vests why operators instruct they´re pilots never to go get water 2 times in the same route.
Why operators instruct they´re pilots to go only after the area has been secure by the military or the police.

Theres no Eco Terrorism in Chile
berlioz is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 11:29
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Age: 67
Posts: 170
Received 35 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by John Eacott
Based on a first hand report from an Erickson employee at the site during the attack, the perpetrators apparently believed the Crane to be involved in logging ops..
I don't see this in your original post!
golfbananajam is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 11:38
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by golfbananajam
I don't see this in your original post!
Maybe because it wasn't in the original post and neither did I say that it was

It was a response to blackdog7 post.
John Eacott is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 12:30
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,229
Received 417 Likes on 260 Posts
Originally Posted by berlioz
They are no Eco-Terrorists.....

They are native poplation who are fighting against the government to regain control of they´re lands.

This is the reason why some pilots doing firefighting use bulletproof vests why operators instruct they´re pilots never to go get water 2 times in the same route.
Why operators instruct they´re pilots to go only after the area has been secure by the military or the police.

Theres no Eco Terrorism in Chile
We have always been at war with East Asia (George Orwell, 1984)
It only takes one act of terrorism to create / become a terrorist. You don't have to be the Unabomber and do a lot of them.
I am going to take your post as a variaiton of "one man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist" and vice versa.

I know a few people who were spiking trees in Oregon and California back in the 90's. They referred to themselves as "environmental activists."

As a helicopter pilot, I consider anyone who wilfully vandalizes a helicopter to be a criminal and a vandal.
Are you excusing this vandalism? (I am asking because I am unclear as to your complete position on this).
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 13:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 65
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
In the first post a quote states after gaining entry to the secure area !

Could not have been that secure then ? You would think with high value assets It should have been very secure ????
helipixman is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 15:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lower Troposphere
Posts: 55
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some may question why Erickson didn't have better security in a country where 36 protesters have died in the last year, over 28,000 have been arrested for protests, and over 400 people have suffered severe eye damage at the hands of the police. When the corrupt government of Sebastian Pinera gives away large plots of forests to his cronies, what could possibly go wrong?
blackdog7 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 20:05
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: End of the pier
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This aircraft was built in 1969 as a CH-54B, cn 61-084 and served the US Army for 32 years as sn 69-18476. Since 2001 it has been owned and operated by Erickson Air-Crane Inc, as N159AC, who modified it to a S-61F standard. With covid19 sweeping the world we have to keep things in perspective, however after 51 years of service, for this aircraft to end it's days being 'vandalised to probable death' makes me really sad.

Does anyone know where in Chile this has occurred and it is too far from 'civilisation' to be recovered for either repair or parting out for spares?

Last edited by Max Skylon; 19th Mar 2020 at 20:18. Reason: missing text & grammar correction
Max Skylon is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 23:53
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by berlioz
They are no Eco-Terrorists.....

They are native poplation who are fighting against the government to regain control of they´re lands.

This is the reason why some pilots doing firefighting use bulletproof vests why operators instruct they´re pilots never to go get water 2 times in the same route.
Why operators instruct they´re pilots to go only after the area has been secure by the military or the police.

Theres no Eco Terrorism in Chile
This is so very sad to see.

In the early 90's I flew 205s out of Trilahue (SE of Concepcion) for three years and saw nothing like this.

We did not wear bullet proof vests and flew whatever routes we thought best.

All of our bases were open to visitors and had no "security" other than us living within 200 yards or so.

We were aware of the Mapuche but they never caused us any problems.

😪for 🇨🇱

Old Dogs is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2020, 15:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York City
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Max Skylon
This aircraft was built in 1969 as a CH-54B, cn 61-084 and served the US Army for 32 years as sn 69-18476. Since 2001 it has been owned and operated by Erickson Air-Crane Inc, as N159AC, who modified it to a S-61F standard.
S-64F standard, I take it?
MikeNYC is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2020, 22:08
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: End of the pier
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Mike, you are correct, I did indeed mean S-64F standard. I also quoted the cn as 61-084 when it should read 64-084.(I have S-61's on the brain at the moment as I have been working on an S-61L/N project recently.)

Aviation Safety Network shows this incident happened at Santa Juana Helipad, Chile.
Max Skylon is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.