NZ CAA Grounds 21 Heli
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Zealand
Age: 57
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NZ CAA Grounds 21 Heli
RNZ News
Twenty-one helicopters across New Zealand have been grounded due to safety concerns about their engines.
A Hughes 500 series helicopter. Rolls Royce 250 engines were primarily fitted in them, the CAA said. Photo: 123rf
Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) director Graeme Harris said: "This action results from recent CAA inspection and monitoring visits to a maintenance organisation that conducts repair and overhaul of Rolls Royce/Allison 250 series turbine engines.
"The visits revealed departures from Rolls Royce approved engine maintenance instructions that adversely affect the airworthiness of the engines. The primary issue relates to unauthorised drilling and grinding work done on safety-critical components within the engine compressor section."
Rolls Royce 250 series engines were primarily fitted to Bell Jet Ranger and Hughes 500 series helicopters but did have some other applications, the CAA said.
Other affected engines were found in Australia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea.
The CAA said it had been "working closely with the maintenance organisation and the engine manufacturer Rolls Royce to determine the safest means of ensuring all affected engines are returned to an airworthy state, while minimising the effects on the aviation sector".
The maintenance organisation had co-operated fully, CAA said.
Harris said: "The CAA is also currently conducting a more thorough review of all of the maintenance organisation's engine maintenance practices. This review commenced today. Further safety action may be necessary in due course but that is unknown at present.
"I have also taken action today to the maintenance organisation from conducting any further RR 250 series engine maintenance works until a detailed safety review can be completed."
Twenty-one helicopters across New Zealand have been grounded due to safety concerns about their engines.
A Hughes 500 series helicopter. Rolls Royce 250 engines were primarily fitted in them, the CAA said. Photo: 123rfCivil Aviation Authority (CAA) director Graeme Harris said: "This action results from recent CAA inspection and monitoring visits to a maintenance organisation that conducts repair and overhaul of Rolls Royce/Allison 250 series turbine engines.
"The visits revealed departures from Rolls Royce approved engine maintenance instructions that adversely affect the airworthiness of the engines. The primary issue relates to unauthorised drilling and grinding work done on safety-critical components within the engine compressor section."
Rolls Royce 250 series engines were primarily fitted to Bell Jet Ranger and Hughes 500 series helicopters but did have some other applications, the CAA said.
Other affected engines were found in Australia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea.
The CAA said it had been "working closely with the maintenance organisation and the engine manufacturer Rolls Royce to determine the safest means of ensuring all affected engines are returned to an airworthy state, while minimising the effects on the aviation sector".
The maintenance organisation had co-operated fully, CAA said.
Harris said: "The CAA is also currently conducting a more thorough review of all of the maintenance organisation's engine maintenance practices. This review commenced today. Further safety action may be necessary in due course but that is unknown at present.
"I have also taken action today to the maintenance organisation from conducting any further RR 250 series engine maintenance works until a detailed safety review can be completed."
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mountain, molehill, CAA.
I don't know the exact details so take what I say with judicious amounts of salt.
From what I have heard, a standard repair procedure that's been carried out in other overhaul facilities in various parts of the world. Something along the lines that not documented in their manuals, ergo in CAA's eyes not a kosher repair.
I don't know the exact details so take what I say with judicious amounts of salt.
From what I have heard, a standard repair procedure that's been carried out in other overhaul facilities in various parts of the world. Something along the lines that not documented in their manuals, ergo in CAA's eyes not a kosher repair.
I also heard that it was a disgruntled ex-employee..
The question is not the motive for the complaint but rather the validity of the complaint.
Was improper work done or not....that is what matters.
Was improper work done or not....that is what matters.
I think the question is was it improper work or work not properly documented? There is quite a difference. Unfortunately documentation can be more important in some eyes than the question of whether or not the job was done properly.
From apprentice to Technical Director, I have been there so many times over the last 40 years, and nowadays documentation is 75% of the task.
The trouble is that the documentation can be "audited" a year after the work was carried out, and since work was carried out months ago new technical or "guidance" information could have been produced or surfaced.
If when completing paperwork you expect it to be critically audited in months to come, you would probably have to take a photo of every stage of the work you carried out, and thats what I did for the last 3 years of my career, literally thousands and thousands of photos to document engineering work.
It came in useful many many times.
Sorry enough ranting whilst stuck indoors...........................stay safe everybody.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The South Coast
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oceania is not a Rolls Royce M250 authorised facility and therefore do not get current repair or modification processes from the OEM. Many modifications (CEB's) no longer publish how to carry out the work required and this is only distributed to the authorised facilities. As with any form of maintenance, cheap repairs are cheap for a reason.
Oceania is not a Rolls Royce M250 authorised facility
https://www.oceania-aviation.com/ser...rbine-engines/
CPB is correct. Just having access to the overhaul manual does not make one a service centre.
Megan, I think you might find there is more to it than just having a few folk that may have worked in part of an overhaul facility before.
I am "factory trained" by PWC, Safran and RR but that does make me an overhaul facilty.
Possibly this was the view taken by a disgruntled employee?
CASA AD/AL 250/91 now in place strangely as applicable from the 24th of March.
Megan, I think you might find there is more to it than just having a few folk that may have worked in part of an overhaul facility before.
I am "factory trained" by PWC, Safran and RR but that does make me an overhaul facilty.
Possibly this was the view taken by a disgruntled employee?
CASA AD/AL 250/91 now in place strangely as applicable from the 24th of March.
The primary safety concern with C18, C28, C30 and C47 series compressor modules relates to unauthorised drilling of compressor impellers for balancing.
The primary safety concern with C20B and C20R series compressor modules relates to blending repairs on compressor rotor wheels with the lack of shot peening.
The primary safety concern with C20B and C20R series compressor modules relates to blending repairs on compressor rotor wheels with the lack of shot peening.
Just having access to the overhaul manual does not make one a service centre
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New Zealand
Age: 52
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are/were a CAA approved Part 145 Over Haul Facility for numerous aircraft components and engines.
It is no difference to some Maintenance Organisations being approved by CAA/FAA/CASA/EASA to maintain/repair/overhaul Bell helicopters. That doesn't make them a Bell CSF, but they are still authorised and approved to do whatever their Airworthiness authority allows them to do.
They may not have been a factory approved facility, but they are a CAA approved facility.
It is no difference to some Maintenance Organisations being approved by CAA/FAA/CASA/EASA to maintain/repair/overhaul Bell helicopters. That doesn't make them a Bell CSF, but they are still authorised and approved to do whatever their Airworthiness authority allows them to do.
They may not have been a factory approved facility, but they are a CAA approved facility.
"Approved service centres" can carry out "approved" factory repair schemes and/or modifications as well which may be the crux of the matter.
These schemes are sometimes under the manufacturers Part 21 approval as an RDAS.
Part 21 and Part 145 do not actually mix that well and in some cases are not permitted to or can be extremely difficult.
Who knows, but at least someone is on to it.
These schemes are sometimes under the manufacturers Part 21 approval as an RDAS.
Part 21 and Part 145 do not actually mix that well and in some cases are not permitted to or can be extremely difficult.
Who knows, but at least someone is on to it.
