Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

New UK AICs, Helicopter Safety Related Topics.

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

New UK AICs, Helicopter Safety Related Topics.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th December 2019 | 10:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
New UK AICs, Helicopter Safety Related Topics.

There are two new "Pink" AICs, (P 316/2019 and P 317/2019). Both discuss topics highly relevant to helicopter pilots and both previously discussed on this forum.

Here: NATS | AIS - Home
ShyTorque is online now  
Reply
Old 24th December 2019 | 11:01
  #2 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 90
From: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
From one who is no longer "young" enough to "know everything" - in aviation and in particular helicopters it pays to
"learn from the mistakes of others as you will not live long enough to make them all yourself" - Eleanor Roosevelt
RVDT is offline  
Reply
Old 24th December 2019 | 13:29
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 508
Likes: 31
From: UK
The AIC relating to Servo Transparency (Jack Stall) quotes Airbus stating that 'Density Altitude' effects the likelihood of encountering the phenomenon. The CAA AIC goes further and states 'high density altitude' indicating that the risk is greater, the higher the aircraft.

If the air is less dense as altitude increases, how can Servo Transparency (caused by aerodynamic control loads) be more likely? Discuss.

JJ
jellycopter is offline  
Reply
Old 24th December 2019 | 14:19
  #4 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 252
Likes: 29
From: Europe
Originally Posted by jellycopter
The AIC relating to Servo Transparency (Jack Stall) quotes Airbus stating that 'Density Altitude' effects the likelihood of encountering the phenomenon. The CAA AIC goes further and states 'high density altitude' indicating that the risk is greater, the higher the aircraft.

If the air is less dense as altitude increases, how can Servo Transparency (caused by aerodynamic control loads) be more likely? Discuss.

JJ
Nothing but an educated assumption here; as density decreases, blade pitch will need to be increased to maintain a given flight condition (say 100kt cruise) so for a causal manoeuvre (usually a sharpish turn or pitch up), the severity of the manoeuvre needn't be as high to produce the same flight control loads as the collective pitch setting is already higher.
ApolloHeli is offline  
Reply
Old 24th December 2019 | 17:17
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Same effect as a greater mass.
ShyTorque is online now  
Reply
Old 24th December 2019 | 17:38
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 508
Likes: 31
From: UK
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
Same effect as a greater mass.
I'm not so sure that's right. If weight is increased, then sure, collective pitch angle has to increase to produce the necessary lift. Accordingly, aerodynamic load increases and servo transparency can ensue.

Stay with me for a minute; hypothetically, if the aircraft were to be climbed to an infinite altitude, i.e. into space. There would be no aerodynamic load so no servo transparency.

I know retreating blade stall is exacerbated by increased density altitude, but Servo Transparency? I've yet to be convinced.

JJ


​​
jellycopter is offline  
Reply
Old 24th December 2019 | 17:48
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
It's now Christmas Eve, my family have begun arriving with the grand kids and I'm not getting deeper into a discussion about work..

...I will hopefully be getting deep into a G&T any minute.

Have fun!
ShyTorque is online now  
Reply
Old 24th December 2019 | 17:54
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 508
Likes: 31
From: UK
Fair point! Enjoy!
jellycopter is offline  
Reply
Old 24th December 2019 | 21:30
  #9 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 636
From: Great South East, tired and retired
Jelly, by your logic there would also be no drag, so the chopper could fly at the speed of heat.
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Reply
Old 25th December 2019 | 16:05
  #10 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 550
Likes: 12
From: Africa
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
There are two new "Pink" AICs, (P 316/2019 and P 317/2019). Both discuss topics highly relevant to helicopter pilots and both previously discussed on this forum.

Here: NATS | AIS - Home
Thanks for sharing this link. The AIC on degraded visibility is particularly well written. While already it would be difficult to fault the authors on any given argument presented, the decidedly deliberate style of writing, avoiding to limit itself to only to indisputable common place statements, is particularly refreshing and adds real value.

I find it much more stimulating to follow such “it can be argued” lines of thought than the usual pontificating that takes place on such topics.
Hot and Hi is offline  
Reply
Old 26th December 2019 | 21:19
  #11 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 431
Likes: 41
From: yes
“...flight tests data indicate that servo transparency could not be encountered if the collective is less than 50% raised.”
JimEli is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.