Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

IR(H) on Agusta 109

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

IR(H) on Agusta 109

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Dec 2019, 20:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: France
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IR(H) on Agusta 109

Where in Europe can I get a dual training TR + IR(H) on an Agusta 109
What school could do a distance learning bridge course ATPL(A) to ATPL(H) with IR?
172510 is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2019, 20:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 807
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Castle Air, Gloucester.
GoodGrief is online now  
Old 23rd Dec 2019, 23:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The 4th dimentia.....
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Bristol Groundschool for the bridging exams. Then IR in 109 could be done at Sloane Northamptonshire afterwards. Or Castle but aircraft availability has been an issue. Starspeed can also provide 109 IR.
Northernstar is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2019, 08:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Manchester
Posts: 55
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Bristol for Groundschool and Helicopter Services in White Waltham for the 109 TR+IR.
Ovc000 is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2019, 08:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wherever I lay my hat
Posts: 3,985
Received 33 Likes on 14 Posts
Are you sure you're converting in the right direction?!
rudestuff is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2019, 22:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: north or south
Age: 51
Posts: 592
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by rudestuff
Are you sure you're converting in the right direction?!
I was thinking the same, why the hell would you spend over 70-80 thousand quid , when the airlines are screaming for pilots

What gives ?
ersa is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2019, 02:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,600
Likes: 0
Received 68 Likes on 27 Posts
Is it a fact that in the USA no specific endorsement is required for A109? as far as the FAA is concerned ? Learn to fly in an R22 and you can fly the 109?
Surely not!
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2019, 09:51
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On the green bit near the blue wobbly stuff
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes, below a particular weight - cant remember - is it 10,000lb? There is no type rating required.
Non-PC Plod is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2019, 09:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On the green bit near the blue wobbly stuff
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Of course - you may find insurance is a problem unless you have done some type training....
Non-PC Plod is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2019, 11:02
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dick Smith
Is it a fact that in the USA no specific endorsement is required for A109? as far as the FAA is concerned ? Learn to fly in an R22 and you can fly the 109?
Surely not!
Yes, that is correct. Anything you want under 12,500 lbs with no type rating. No multi-engine rating for helicopters either. You can go directly from a 22 to anything you want. Absolutely no violation of FAA regulations. But you would be uninsurable, of course.

In all US of aviation, FAA regulations reflect only the minimum requirements. The insurance industry effectively takes over after that and they slather a rather thick layer of virtual reg's on top. Want to hire pilots for your tiny little R44 tour operation? The insurer says they have to have 500 hours minimum, not the FAA.

If you choose not to insure, or self-insure, you have a wonderful degree of freedom, at the risk of being sued into oblivion. This is a fine example of how almost pure capitalism works, by the way. If the FAA got out of the pilot certification business and left that to industry as well it would be completely pure.
aa777888 is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2019, 23:43
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 67
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dick Smith
Is it a fact that in the USA no specific endorsement is required for A109? as far as the FAA is concerned ? Learn to fly in an R22 and you can fly the 109?
Surely not!
Dick,

As aa777888 says, unless the aircraft requires a type rating ( weight above 12,500 lbs ) one license covers them all, single or twin. So yeah, in theory take your private exam in an R22 and then hop into a S76 that afternoon.

One aircraft I fly is owned by someone wealthy enough to self insure, but liability insurance is a different story. He can afford to lose the hull ( and has saved enough money to buy a couple hulls over the years) but being as wealthy as he is makes him a target for lawsuits, so liability insurance is pretty much required. You probably would need to be a billionaire to not need liability insurance. Rich enough to exhaust anyone's ability to sue you... I'm guessing that part is true in OZ as well?

In any case, the insurance company is very strict - the only place authorized for recurrent training is at the factory, and they have a minimum of 1,000 hours to be pic... Some other minimums I can't remember at the moment. So, as aa777888 says, pretty much regulated by the insurers unless you are a complete idiot.
Paul Cantrell is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.