VH-92A causes "discoloration" of South Lawn
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Stagnation Point
Posts: 28
VH-92A causes "discoloration" of South Lawn
https://www.nationaldefensemagazine....nal-capability
GAO said:
“The lawn is a highly visible, size-constrained landing zone where damage to the White House grounds needs to be minimized,” the report stated. “There is a possibility of increased cost and schedule delays if the program has to retrofit produced aircraft.”
Holy cow!
GAO said:
“The lawn is a highly visible, size-constrained landing zone where damage to the White House grounds needs to be minimized,” the report stated. “There is a possibility of increased cost and schedule delays if the program has to retrofit produced aircraft.”
Holy cow!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: daworld
Posts: 601
Hmmm. I wonder how the AW101 would have faired on the Whitehouse lawn. Probably no better. But at least it had a cabin large enough to meet the specification. LOL. AW must have been laughing all the way to the bank when they got paid off when they were cancelled. And now Canada is laughing because the Presidential 101's will become Cormorants. Or at least be used as parts in a mid-life update.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Nigeria
Age: 52
Posts: 4,470
Seems odd - never known the standard S-92 APU exhaust to be an issue and I don't think this is different. Only time I was aware of it was when I parked next to a large bush once, in a hurry, but that wasn't the norm!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Galway
Posts: 58
Originally Posted by MightyGem
Probably the exhaust being directed down to the ground by the rotor downwash. Used to happen with our Lynx before they fitted the IR Reduction ducts.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Nigeria
Age: 52
Posts: 4,470
I note also:
Wow, what a novel idea. Why did nobody else think of that?
Additionally, the service has set future requirements for the aircraft, he noted. These include installing a fifth display in the cockpit
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 289
Originally Posted by industry insider
I think Wrench might be talking about the APU in the H3. The 92 APU exhaust wouldn't reach lawn level.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Nigeria
Age: 52
Posts: 4,470
Originally Posted by wrench1
Never had the pleasure of an H3, but was around the 1st 92 production model(s) which spent a few hours on the pad each day in the beginning with the APU going. After a week or so each pad it was parked on, the grass next to the pad had a signature 92 burned spot. We wondered if it would ever cause a fire until one day there was a fire. Unfortunately, it wasn't the grass.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 356
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the unsurpassed ability of R22's and R44's to leave beautiful burn spots on otherwise nice lawns. No, you wags, I don't mean because of the "inevitable" crash, I mean because when sitting there doing the 3 minute cool-down routine all that cold air that the squirrel cage fan is sucking in to cool the engine is being ejected, now burning hot, straight down onto the ground. It really does do a fine job of turning green grass brown, and can actually be a fire hazard when landing in tall, dry grass.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 289
Originally Posted by 212man
Yes - leaking hydraulic fluid at 4,000 PSI burns much better than grass!
