Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

PHOENIX "rescue" No thanks!

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

PHOENIX "rescue" No thanks!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Dec 2022, 07:13
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,329
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Originally Posted by widgeon
Interesting , she did not believe airlift was necessary , is it another case of the medical guys running up the bill needlessly ?.
Not so much that I think, but they have been called out and want to justify getting airborne by making a heroic rescue. I don't know how many winching jobs they got a year but if it wasn't many they may have seen it as an ideal time to practice their 'skills'!
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2022, 21:08
  #82 (permalink)  
LRP
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Not so much that I think, but they have been called out and want to justify getting airborne by making a heroic rescue. I don't know how many winching jobs they got a year but if it wasn't many they may have seen it as an ideal time to practice their 'skills'!
The decision to transport is made by on scene ground personnel based on patient condition, mechanism of injury, etc. The aircrew has no say in it.
LRP is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2022, 21:24
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 151
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by LRP
The decision to transport is made by on scene ground personnel based on patient condition, mechanism of injury, etc. The aircrew has no say in it.
And therein lies the first problem. Only the aircrew will be fully aware of the risk of winching. They should be qualified clinically to make an assessment as to whether the risk of a winch is justified by the casualties condition. A clinical ground party cannot make the decision and non clinically trained aircrew cannot make the decision. You need a wholistic solution otherwise errors and mistakes will continue to occur.

The second problem was how the aircrew dealt with the spin and enough has been said about that already!
snakepit is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2022, 22:01
  #84 (permalink)  
LRP
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by snakepit
And therein lies the first problem. Only the aircrew will be fully aware of the risk of winching. They should be qualified clinically to make an assessment as to whether the risk of a winch is justified by the casualties condition. A clinical ground party cannot make the decision and non clinically trained aircrew cannot make the decision. You need a wholistic solution otherwise errors and mistakes will continue to occur.

The second problem was how the aircrew dealt with the spin and enough has been said about that already!
My answer had to do with the decision to call for a transport by air. The aircrew always has the right to refuse based on weather, LZ suitability, or other operational issues.
Patient condition is assessed by the first responders and they call for air transport in accordance with their protocols. Generally the only time the aircrew would refuse to transport based on patient condition would be if they were not stable enough for transport.
LRP is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2022, 06:56
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,329
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
A professional outfit would have winched one of the crew down - and if you don't have medically qualified rear crew why are you transporting casualties in the first place - who would have given a full assessment based on medical and aviation knowledge. They would also have ensured the ground party knew how to use a line to stabilise the stretcher.

The ground party may have asked for the helicopter but the crew can make the decision not to winch.

Just amateur-hour all round.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2022, 07:23
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: SE Australia
Posts: 154
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I have a friend that was involved in a similar incident in NSW many moons ago and the consequences of the spin were greater than the original injury. It was particularly noticeable in his eyes and I've never asked if he suffered permanent damage to them from the spin. Given it was Australia many years ago I suspect he simply got on with life as well as he could.
SRFred is online now  
Old 4th Dec 2022, 14:12
  #87 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
A professional outfit would have winched one of the crew down - and if you don't have medically qualified rear crew why are you transporting casualties in the first place - who would have given a full assessment based on medical and aviation knowledge. They would also have ensured the ground party knew how to use a line to stabilise the stretcher.

The ground party may have asked for the helicopter but the crew can make the decision not to winch.

Just amateur-hour all round.
From the video, the terrain looked like it might have been possible to land on nearby, removing the need to winch in the first place!
ShyTorque is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 4th Dec 2022, 14:17
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,289
Received 512 Likes on 214 Posts
How do we know what the Helicopter Crew was "thinking"?

Is there a Investigative Report available for this event that has findings for that?

We have the one news article linked reporting the settlement of the Civil Suit.

What stands out to me from that article is the following statement.

The claim was signed by lawyer K Thomas Slack, who stated that Metro ‘did not want to be taken off the trail by helicopter’ after an evaluation found that she did not need any kind of emergency transport. Slack added that despite this, the city fire department had decided to use a helicopter over any form of ground transportation.
I see more far more problems than a terribly bad Winching.....as bad as that was....the insistence by the Ground Units the Patient be Winched is the main problem that set up the failure by the Helicopter Crew.

The question that should be addressed is just why that happened....how far was it to a site where the Helicopter could be landed and the Patient ground loaded?

If it had been a Private EMS operator and the Patient refused Air Transport....that would have ended it right there and she would have gone by ground.

What Authority does the Fire Department and EMS have to overrule that Patient Refusal especially in light of her not having any critical need for transport?

Was the Helicopter Crew advised of the patient's refusal?

If so did the Crew look for a ground landing site adjacent to where the patient was located?

What alternatives were available for moving the patient by Winch?



SASless is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 4th Dec 2022, 15:25
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,329
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
I just see it as a problem with the city Fire Dept..........
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2022, 23:01
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,944
Received 394 Likes on 209 Posts
Just amateur-hour all round
The performance of a crew on a task may just be reflective of managements ethos - we can't afford to spend money on training, we can't afford to send people to industry forums to gain an education. You are consigned to working in a sheltered workshop tending mushrooms.
megan is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 5th Dec 2022, 07:38
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,329
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Agreed Megan and the result is an operational echo chamber
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2022, 11:55
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PLanet Earth
Posts: 1,329
Received 104 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by uxb99
While uncomfortable would this be dangerous? The person is spinning around their axis.
The head and thereby the brain are spun at a radius of about half the size of the human. Therefore a signifcant centrifgual force will applied to the brain and blood will be pumped into Head and Brain at relatively high pressure. And for the head these are negative g's, where humans are much less toelrant than positive g's. In this case, assuming a radius of ~0,75m and a rate of ~2 gyrations per second I arrive at >-10g. Which as a sustainend load is quite a bit.
But I just saw the damage to the brain/head this case was not too big. I was concerned it might have led to intracranial hemorrage.

Last edited by henra; 5th Dec 2022 at 12:05.
henra is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 5th Dec 2022, 16:31
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,848
Received 56 Likes on 37 Posts
Additionally there is the point that they would have had to land somewhere anyway as from my fading memory I am pretty sure you can not get the stretcher/litter into the cabin from the winch on the A109 in flight.
RVDT is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.