Bell 222 UT/B operators
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Africa
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bell 222 UT/B operators
We own and operate a large fleet of 222UTs and keen to connect with current or previous operators of the type. Our interest resides in acquiring parts, components and engines. It would be interesting to hear from pilots and maintenance crew that know the type well. We are lead to believe many of the UTs did time in Japan and that a lot of expertise resided there. Thanks FD
How many 222's did Bell manufacture? Can't be that many, will limit the pool somewhat.
ROTORSPOT - Production list for Bell 222
The link will give you an indication as to how many that is still around, and last reg for each. (not always up to date, but it's an indication).
The link will give you an indication as to how many that is still around, and last reg for each. (not always up to date, but it's an indication).
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Send me a PM. I can put you in touch with a company that has two airframes available. One is flying the other can be put back in the air with minimal effort. They also have spares incl engines.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South East Asia
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We are lead to believe many of the UTs did time in Japan and that a lot of expertise resided there. Very true, Japan Royal Helicopters were a big operator of this type. East Asia Airlines in Macau was also an operator of the 222B/UT leased from Japan Royal. The component repair and overhaul of these airframes was provide by Vancouver Island helicopters, itself a 222 operator. VIH had a number of in-house repair schemes to keep components in service. EAA engines were supported by the Textron Lycoming (as it was then) MRO at Greer in South Carolina. Man-hour costs in Japan at the time were far too high so it did not make commercial sense having any work done there.
Mechanics/engineers who have previous experience on Bell "Lights" and "Mediums" will see some similarity - but not much, the 222 is very "un-Bell." The main shortcomings are the life of the numerous elastomerics and the reliability of the electrical system. With the latter, you'll find far more connectors than you're used too as wiring looms pass from one area to another. Don't pay too much attention to the negative comments you'll hear regarding the engines. Pay close attention to No. 2 bearings and the Delta "P" readings and you'll be OK.
Finally, if any of your 222's are fitted with the Honeywell autopilot system installed under the Helidyne STC be prepared for huge financial outlays to keep it working.
Mechanics/engineers who have previous experience on Bell "Lights" and "Mediums" will see some similarity - but not much, the 222 is very "un-Bell." The main shortcomings are the life of the numerous elastomerics and the reliability of the electrical system. With the latter, you'll find far more connectors than you're used too as wiring looms pass from one area to another. Don't pay too much attention to the negative comments you'll hear regarding the engines. Pay close attention to No. 2 bearings and the Delta "P" readings and you'll be OK.
Finally, if any of your 222's are fitted with the Honeywell autopilot system installed under the Helidyne STC be prepared for huge financial outlays to keep it working.
