![]() |
Bell 222 UT/B operators
We own and operate a large fleet of 222UTs and keen to connect with current or previous operators of the type. Our interest resides in acquiring parts, components and engines. It would be interesting to hear from pilots and maintenance crew that know the type well. We are lead to believe many of the UTs did time in Japan and that a lot of expertise resided there. Thanks FD
|
Based at Rand airport by any chance?
Cannibalising carcasses only goes so far as a business model. |
PAS/SAS did it for years with the MD902 .... and the Bo105/S61 still do well. Perhaps the business margins are greater than you may expect.
|
Originally Posted by DeltaNg
(Post 10457447)
PAS/SAS did it for years with the MD902 .... and the Bo105/S61 still do well. Perhaps the business margins are greater than you may expect.
How many 222's did Bell manufacture? Can't be that many, will limit the pool somewhat. |
ROTORSPOT - Production list for Bell 222
The link will give you an indication as to how many that is still around, and last reg for each. (not always up to date, but it's an indication). |
Send me a PM. I can put you in touch with a company that has two airframes available. One is flying the other can be put back in the air with minimal effort. They also have spares incl engines. |
We are lead to believe many of the UTs did time in Japan and that a lot of expertise resided there. Very true, Japan Royal Helicopters were a big operator of this type. East Asia Airlines in Macau was also an operator of the 222B/UT leased from Japan Royal. The component repair and overhaul of these airframes was provide by Vancouver Island helicopters, itself a 222 operator. VIH had a number of in-house repair schemes to keep components in service. EAA engines were supported by the Textron Lycoming (as it was then) MRO at Greer in South Carolina. Man-hour costs in Japan at the time were far too high so it did not make commercial sense having any work done there.
Mechanics/engineers who have previous experience on Bell "Lights" and "Mediums" will see some similarity - but not much, the 222 is very "un-Bell." The main shortcomings are the life of the numerous elastomerics and the reliability of the electrical system. With the latter, you'll find far more connectors than you're used too as wiring looms pass from one area to another. Don't pay too much attention to the negative comments you'll hear regarding the engines. Pay close attention to No. 2 bearings and the Delta "P" readings and you'll be OK. Finally, if any of your 222's are fitted with the Honeywell autopilot system installed under the Helidyne STC be prepared for huge financial outlays to keep it working. |
Heli-Welders Canada has a repo'd 230 in their hangar, anxiously looking for a buyer. Utility with bubble door and hook, skids.
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....9715b978c4.jpg |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 14:43. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.