Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Sikorsky SB-1 flies for first time

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Sikorsky SB-1 flies for first time

Old 4th May 2022, 02:28
  #441 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 214
Received 30 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Commando Cody
"Why would a major prime enter into contract with impossible to meet requirements? Because thatís the way the game was played 40 years ago". Absolutely right. And then, as in now, when it's the only game in town you take the chance and hope that maybe the customer will come to its senses somewhere along the way. Don't you find it fascinating that the Program Management of the program has said it can't be built as specified and yet no one's head has exploded over this? I eagerly await further developments...
The defense industry (both fixed and rotary wing) needs to get away from "make or break" contracts that only come out every 20-30 years. Companies need to get into the habit of developing new platforms, whether for production, research, or competitive prototypes almost constantly. Without a continual cycle of actually developing products, we lose the ability to develop the big generational projects skillfully and on time. I actually think we've made some small strides in the rotary wing business... Sikorsky's investment in the X-2TD and S-97 was admirable, even if a little late to self-imposed deadlines. Those projects filled a gap between the CH-148 and CH-53K and the JMR-TD competition that birthed Defiant. Iterations of learning, even if the exact concept is more than a little snake-bit. Bell's performance on their JMR-TD aircraft was excellent and followed the internal development of the 525. I do agree that the FARA requirements being described publicly as "not compatible with the laws of physics" is disappointing, but the development speed of the prototypes is not.

It's tough work to decide fast, design fast, and build fast but those are good skills to develop and ultimately a cheaper way to get new capabilities to the customer.

When Bell's 360 flies, it'll be an aircraft, but likely to undergo revision for a production FARA... when the laws of physics are violated, somethings got to give. Rotor diameter, speed requirements, something. Same will be true for Raider-X, whenever she flies.
SplineDrive is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2022, 09:32
  #442 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 81
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Defiant is dead.
noneofyourbusiness is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2022, 15:54
  #443 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 6,560
Received 73 Likes on 46 Posts
No it's not, it's resting.
Beautiful plumage, the Norwegian blue pusher prop, the Defiant ...
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2022, 18:43
  #444 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Age: 68
Posts: 61
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Devil Defiant

The main rotor blades are so stiff ... looks as though Rigor Mortis has set in.
Ott.
Otterotor is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2022, 14:29
  #445 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 81
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Rigor Mortis? so sad. It looks tits up to me.
noneofyourbusiness is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.