Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

SE CAT flights at Night quiz

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

SE CAT flights at Night quiz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th September 2018 | 21:37
  #21 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 959
Likes: 3
From: New Zealand
Originally Posted by SASless
Really?

If the engine fails in a single engine aircraft....day or night....you are guaranteed a landing.

The difficulty at night particularly is making a safe landing.
OK may I re-phrase my attempted quick comment into a wordy one then? In the dark it's hard to identify a suitable, open, smooth surfaced area, free of obstacles and wires to autorotate into, it's hard to gauge the wind direction and it's hard to judge the flare.

And after you have done all that it's probably going to be hard to walk away from it!
krypton_john is offline  
Reply
Old 28th September 2018 | 00:28
  #22 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
From: USA
COCISS? .
aa777888 is offline  
Reply
Old 28th September 2018 | 02:41
  #23 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 888
Likes: 65
From: California
Originally Posted by Thomas coupling
The ONLY place for an unstabilsed SE helo in this (safety conscious) day and age is day VFR, COCISS.
Glad we Yanks haven't progressed to your day and age!
Robbiee is offline  
Reply
Old 28th September 2018 | 13:52
  #24 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 927
Likes: 12
From: Germany
Originally Posted by aa777888
COCISS? .
Clear
of
Cloud
in
sight of
surface
Flying Bull is offline  
Reply
Old 28th September 2018 | 17:53
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,670
Likes: 1
From: UK
Robbie
Thats why you yanks will continue to make CFIT a sport.
And please don't tell me you fly a robbo as well?
Thomas coupling is offline  
Reply
Old 28th September 2018 | 20:05
  #26 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
TC,

Please do explain how you arrived at that conclusion?

CFIT accidents never happen in the UK or EASA Land?
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 28th September 2018 | 22:00
  #27 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 768
Likes: 45
From: Montreal
Stabilized as the solution? We flew Day/Night IFR for years on medvac with unstabilized Bell222UT. Never an issue. Even did the odd single-pilot hard IFR night flight, just for the challenge. After all, it was certified for single-pilot IFR. Have since seen lots of stabilized 139, 92, 76’s stove in CFIT.
Try again.
malabo is offline  
Reply
Old 28th September 2018 | 22:15
  #28 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 888
Likes: 65
From: California
Originally Posted by Thomas coupling
Robbie
Thats why you yanks will continue to make CFIT a sport.
And please don't tell me you fly a robbo as well?
Yep I do. Over 300 CFIT free night hours, mostly sight seeing flights around a nicely lighted city in the little old R22, plus about 180 of that is night xc, and yep, still in the 22.

We yanks do a lot of night tours in Robbo's and Jetboxes. CFIT is for HEMS

Now excuse me while I find some wood to knock on
Robbiee is offline  
Reply
Old 29th September 2018 | 00:39
  #29 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
TC....how many night and IMC hours did the US Army fly in OH-6, 13, 23, UH-1, H-19,21, 25, 34, TH-55, and TH-57's? The odd couple of Million or so.....all single engine and un-stabilized....some with only basic instruments and a mag compass.

I am thinking your fingers are operating independently of your brain again.
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 29th September 2018 | 10:36
  #30 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Den Helder
Stabilized as the solution? We flew Day/Night IFR for years on medvac with unstabilized Bell222UT. Never an issue. Even did the odd single-pilot hard IFR night flight, just for the challenge. After all, it was certified for single-pilot IFR. Have since seen lots of stabilized 139, 92, 76’s stove in CFIT.
Try again.
if you don’t have the visual references then the stabilisation clearly increases safety, and its very easy to lose the visual references at night as you can’t see the cloud coming or the unlit terrain as in the 1982 accident above.

i have 750 hours at night in a mixture of stabilised and unstabilised platforms.
SFIM is offline  
Reply
Old 29th September 2018 | 15:32
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 744
Likes: 5
From: london
On the nail SFIM, but stabilisation has nothing to do with CFIT because if you lose it in an unstabilised cab it isnt CFIT but UFIT - totally uncontrolled. How can stabilisation prevent CFIT?

And for the record single engine IFR is totally acceptable to the CAA - ask the boys at Kemble
homonculus is offline  
Reply
Old 29th September 2018 | 18:51
  #32 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Den Helder
And for the record single engine IFR is totally acceptable to the CAA - ask the boys at Kemble
as I said twice above i agree the number of engines is not relevant especially modern turbines.
SFIM is offline  
Reply
Old 29th September 2018 | 18:54
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,670
Likes: 1
From: UK
SAS: Them there's mil pilots, mate.
BIG difiference between mil drivers @ night unstab and the lumpen proletariat in their Meccano kits @ night/Unstab.

Hi Homonculus, how's life in the medical world?

Stab at night 'assists' the pilot when he/she has a 'wobbly'....and loses SA. It's that little difference between life and death at times!
Who you talking about @ Kemble?

As for you Malabo - not biting!
Thomas coupling is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2018 | 12:31
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
From: N/A
OP it was stopped in 1988 in UK, but not as a result of any accident

some strange statements on here
- like the idea that you can't see clouds coming - of course you can see where there aren't clouds.
- like the mention of engines, not relevant
- stabilisation, are we breeding a generation that cant fly without stabilisation?
AnFI is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2018 | 17:54
  #35 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 888
Likes: 65
From: California
Originally Posted by AnFI
OP it was stopped in 1988 in UK, but not as a result of any accident

some strange statements on here
- like the idea that you can't see clouds coming - of course you can see where there aren't clouds.
Ha! funny
Robbiee is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2018 | 02:03
  #36 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 161
Likes: 5
From: UK
I’ve flown at night in Robbies and aircraft that are suppose to be ifr capable like as355 f models. I think the 355 without the autopilot and trim is more unsteady and unstabilised than an r22.
haihio is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.