Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Airbus 'defective parts'

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Airbus 'defective parts'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th September 2018 | 19:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 16
From: Waltham Abbey, Essex, UK
Airbus 'defective parts'

An article has just appeared in Defense News that mentions that defective main rotor parts were supplied by Airbus to the South Koreans for a Surion derivative that crashed on July 17 killing five. The part came from an unidentified Airbus supplier.

https://www.defensenews.com/global/a...icopter-crash/
PANews is offline  
Reply
Old 13th September 2018 | 06:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Hyperspace
On the face of it, this does read as if the cause is the same as the Norway 225, but with a short amount of elapsed time since the crash, one would have to stop and think as to whether or not the Koreans have had enough time yet to carry out the analysis required to say it was a defective mast.

Sure the mast failed and the MRH flew on alone, but why did the mast fail - did the MRGB suddenly stop (as Norway), was the mast moment too high, was it defective as they are suggesting?

If the Koreans have carried out enough analysis to prove their info release, then we ought to send the AAIB there to learn a thing or two!
JackJones is offline  
Reply
Old 13th September 2018 | 12:47
  #3 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Perhaps AirBus attended the same course as did the Koreans....as they are agreeing with the posting of the information.

Of course....we can certainly hang our hat on everything Air Bus has to say in these matters can't we?
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 13th September 2018 | 13:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Hyperspace
Ha yeah of course they do, as it's pointing a finger at a source lower in the supply chain, if Airbus themselves had made the part, I think the agreement may have taken much longer to materialise
JackJones is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.