Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Airbus Helicopters pitch h135 for the USN TH-57 replacement

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Airbus Helicopters pitch h135 for the USN TH-57 replacement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th May 2018, 21:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,162
Received 101 Likes on 54 Posts
Airbus Helicopters pitch h135 for the USN TH-57 replacement

Well this competition has been going on for a while with Bell pitching the 407GX(P) - they painted up one up in training colors a few years back for the NHA fly in at Pensacola. Leonardo is pitching the TH-119K and Airbus Helicopters with the H135. It is a weird one - surprised they are not promoting the UH-72A becauase there are several examples with USNTPS at Pax River. On the army side, its already at Fort Rucker doing IERW.

There is an USN exchange instructor pilot with the German Marineflieger EC135 of MFG-5

So any thoughts or bets here?

cheers

Airbus to Pitch H135 as US Navy Trainer Replacement - Rotor & Wing International



chopper2004 is offline  
Old 18th May 2018, 15:35
  #2 (permalink)  
LRP
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
Makes sense to go with the 135. By selecting a different airframe than the Army (UH-72), you can justify a separate procurement process and maximize the number of O5/O6 retirement jobs available.
LRP is offline  
Old 19th May 2018, 14:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Global Citizen
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LRP
Makes sense to go with the 135. By selecting a different airframe than the Army (UH-72), you can justify a separate procurement process and maximize the number of O5/O6 retirement jobs available.
That would almost be comical, if it wasn’t the truth.
stormfury is offline  
Old 19th May 2018, 19:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Below Escape Velocity
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That would almost be comical, if it wasn’t the truth.
Can't get an airframe from the same manufacturer. There is a danger that one individual might be able to hold down two separate positions that way. Additionally, a second manufacturer I believe increases the number of lawyers who can put their oar in to generate lawsuits in all directions.

I believe the UH-72 is still tied up in the courts due to the Army adding to their stable of UH-72s using a no-competition, no-bid process, which exercised AW & Bell, though only AW got up the energy to file suit.
Um... lifting... is offline  
Old 19th May 2018, 23:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Amory, MS
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UH-72 lawsuits have been dismissed/withdrawn.
Helitech2316 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.