PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   Airbus Helicopters pitch h135 for the USN TH-57 replacement (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/608991-airbus-helicopters-pitch-h135-usn-th-57-replacement.html)

chopper2004 17th May 2018 21:40

Airbus Helicopters pitch h135 for the USN TH-57 replacement
 
Well this competition has been going on for a while with Bell pitching the 407GX(P) - they painted up one up in training colors a few years back for the NHA fly in at Pensacola. Leonardo is pitching the TH-119K and Airbus Helicopters with the H135. It is a weird one - surprised they are not promoting the UH-72A becauase there are several examples with USNTPS at Pax River. On the army side, its already at Fort Rucker doing IERW.

There is an USN exchange instructor pilot with the German Marineflieger EC135 of MFG-5

So any thoughts or bets here?

cheers

Airbus to Pitch H135 as US Navy Trainer Replacement - Rotor & Wing International

https://farm1.staticflickr.com/970/2...b4f20d44_b.jpg

https://farm1.staticflickr.com/949/4...d8c07197_z.jpg

LRP 18th May 2018 15:35

Makes sense to go with the 135. By selecting a different airframe than the Army (UH-72), you can justify a separate procurement process and maximize the number of O5/O6 retirement jobs available.

stormfury 19th May 2018 14:35


Originally Posted by LRP (Post 10150485)
Makes sense to go with the 135. By selecting a different airframe than the Army (UH-72), you can justify a separate procurement process and maximize the number of O5/O6 retirement jobs available.

That would almost be comical, if it wasn’t the truth.

Um... lifting... 19th May 2018 19:07


That would almost be comical, if it wasn’t the truth.
Can't get an airframe from the same manufacturer. There is a danger that one individual might be able to hold down two separate positions that way. Additionally, a second manufacturer I believe increases the number of lawyers who can put their oar in to generate lawsuits in all directions.

I believe the UH-72 is still tied up in the courts due to the Army adding to their stable of UH-72s using a no-competition, no-bid process, which exercised AW & Bell, though only AW got up the energy to file suit.

Helitech2316 19th May 2018 23:22

UH-72 lawsuits have been dismissed/withdrawn.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:43.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.