Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

EASA or FAA CPL(H)

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

EASA or FAA CPL(H)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th May 2018, 11:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Hyperspace
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EASA or FAA CPL(H)

Before I get bashed for not searching, or dredging up same old, same old questions; I have searched PPRUNE, EASA & FAA websites, UK CAA & Google, and can find no real definitive answer to what I am trying to ascertain.

So the score currently, I currently have a PPL(H) with more than enough hours to start a CPL flying course, have added more to my licence than the usual R22, so now have another 3 airframes including turbine helicopters on my licence, and ultimately unsure what my next move ought to be.

Has anyone on here any experience of using an EASA PPL to go and get either a TCAA CPL or FAA CPL, then changing it back to an EASA CPL once gained - or is this just making life extremely difficult for myself?

Ultimately I do want to get my EASA CPL (or whatever we will call it after Brexit), and I do want to fly for a living, but I also want to do it in the most cost effective manner possible.

Can anyone add any constructive advice?
JackJones is offline  
Old 16th May 2018, 13:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,959
Received 22 Likes on 13 Posts
My advice would be to do your training in whatever country/aviation authority that you think that you will end up working in.

If you’ve got a right to work in the USA (and intend living there), get an FAA licence. If you’ve got a European passport but only speak English, I would do your training in the UK. If you speak a European language, consider training in France/Italy/Germany etc* (*delete where applicable).

It might cost you slightly more initially but it will be worth it in the medium to long term. A commercial licence is more than just a piece of paper. Not only will you be more familiar with your future working environment, but your network for future jobs will also be much more developed.
Bravo73 is offline  
Old 16th May 2018, 13:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
Yeah, if you don't need EASA, don't do it....
paco is online now  
Old 16th May 2018, 13:42
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Age: 55
Posts: 464
Received 43 Likes on 29 Posts
Join the Navy
Sir Korsky is offline  
Old 16th May 2018, 13:43
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Hyperspace
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by paco
Yeah, if you don't need EASA, don't do it....
Sorry to say that I live here in the UK, so EASA is unavoidable Phil! Unless you can educate me otherwise?
JackJones is offline  
Old 16th May 2018, 13:45
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Hyperspace
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sir Korsky
Join the Navy
Already left the military back in the naughties as a non flying trade, old Lizzie didn't want me as one of her two wing master race at the time as my face didn't fit!
JackJones is offline  
Old 17th May 2018, 00:24
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: South East Asia
Age: 54
Posts: 320
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Nobody mentioned the different training standard yet? getting you FAA CPL(H) is really a "license to learn" and figure out the rest on your own. EASA teach you much more proficiency. things like, down wind quick stop, 360 autos, all tail rotor failure scenarios, much greater confidence will come you out of EASA training, In the end nothing replace flying hours to get you better, Cost wise, USA is the place that will allow you to maximize that, weather wise Florida is the place that will allow you to maximize that,
Agile is offline  
Old 17th May 2018, 17:29
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: earth
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Agile
Nobody mentioned the different training standard yet? getting you FAA CPL(H) is really a "license to learn" and figure out the rest on your own. EASA teach you much more proficiency. things like, down wind quick stop, 360 autos, all tail rotor failure scenarios, much greater confidence will come you out of EASA training, In the end nothing replace flying hours to get you better, Cost wise, USA is the place that will allow you to maximize that, weather wise Florida is the place that will allow you to maximize that,
Huh, I did down wind quick stops during my FAA private training, and 360 autos I got to do at the Robinson course (along with pedal turns and autoing sideways/backwards, etc.) also had a cfi show me stuck pedal recovery when I was still under 100 hours,...big deal!

Anyway, you got it wrong, here in the States its the cfi rating that is the "license to learn", our cpl?

...all that'll get you is a cup of coffee at Starbucks,...well after you pay them six bucks!
r22butters is offline  
Old 17th May 2018, 18:44
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: steady
Posts: 382
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Butters, I read post #8 during my first coffee this morning and I absolutely knew in my heart you where going to be #9 and jump at that post. You are getting far to predictable, buddy...
whoknows idont is offline  
Old 17th May 2018, 21:46
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: earth
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah,

,...I really need a hobby.
r22butters is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.