Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Another Robinson crash

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Another Robinson crash

Old 4th Oct 2017, 00:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 21
Another Robinson crash

1 dead, 1 injured after helicopter crashes in dense Vancouver Island bush - British Columbia - CBC News
Aussierob is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2017, 01:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: canada
Posts: 192
The pilot killed was a very well respected member of the canadian helicopter industry. She will be sorely missed and condolences to all her friends and family. I personally did not know her but I have several friends grieving...
twinstar_ca is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2017, 01:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 12
Originally Posted by twinstar_ca View Post
The pilot killed was a very well respected member of the canadian helicopter industry. She will be sorely missed and condolences to all her friends and family. I personally did not know her but I have several friends grieving...
Would you mind PMing me her name? I'm just hoping it's not who I think it is.
pilot1234567 is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2017, 17:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 575
Name hasnít been released yet, previously worked at STARS in Grand Prairie and Highland.

Not sure why this thread needs to be titled as ďanotherĒ by some Robinson-bashing cretin. Lots of 44ís flying with a reputation in the industry (outside of PPRuNe) as good helicopters.
malabo is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2017, 17:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Moo moo land
Posts: 279
Probably because Since 1982, there have been at least 512 deaths in 291 Robinson crashes worldwide..

Does seem a touch high. figures shamelessly googled.

Safer than riding a Motorbike I guess

Condolences to all concerned
lowfat is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2017, 20:06
  #7 (permalink)  

Better red than ...
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Appleby-in-Westmorland Cumbria England
Posts: 1,403
3305 Bell UH1 variants were destroyed during the Vietnam war (figures shamelessly Googled). Does seem a touch high.

As Disraeli put it. Lies. Damn lies.... And statistics.
helicopter-redeye is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2017, 03:10
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 394
In the US, currently a similar number of Bells and Robinsons are crashing each year. Of course, there are more of each than any other type, so that skews the stat's. And, no doubt the Bells are doing more challenging stuff like long line work, and Robinsons are doing more challenging stuff like primary instruction. And, with the operating costs so low, no doubt the Robinsons are being flown by people with a lot less experience (myself included), which also skews the stat's.

Given that this latest event may involve someone with a lot of experience, perhaps it is the exception rather than the rule. Nevertheless, with all of the design improvements since the original 22's and 44's were launched, and SFAR 73, it's getting awfully hard to blame the machine itself as the root of all evil nowadays. That said, there are still a lot of people with a bad taste in their mouth from an earlier time in the evolution of the Robinson designs, some who have personally lost someone dear to them, and we'll hear from them loudly whenever a Robinson goes down, regardless of the cause.

Regardless of whether you think Robinsons are "death machines" or not, there is no question they have made rotary wing flight available and accessible to many more people than would otherwise be the case, and I personally know many Robinson pilots who happily fly a Robinson rather than not fly at all.
aa777888 is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2017, 04:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 895
The thing is, when evaluating the merits of the machine, is to eliminate the pilots from the equation.

IOW how many crashes caused by the design/manufacture and not the pilot or maintenance?

There is a suggestion that some RH blades have failed catastrophically in flight when operated in accordance with best practice (no low g, no high speed into turbulence etc). If there are a number of those then we have a problem.
krypton_john is online now  
Old 6th Oct 2017, 08:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Europe
Age: 29
Posts: 35
We will compare with new basic trainers:


https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase...hp?AcType=G2CA
Helisweet is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2017, 08:23
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK/OZ
Posts: 1,682
One occupant survived the crash and was extracted from wreckage, so presumably there was no fire.

It is so unfortunate that the improved crash worthiness version of the fuel system took as long as it did to be implemented.

Mjb
mickjoebill is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2017, 09:48
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On top of the Longline
Posts: 298
The number of crashes per hours flown expressed as a percentage of the total hours flown by each manufacturers fleet would be an interesting comparison, but Iím shamelessly too lazy to google it.
heliduck is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2017, 10:10
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 7,445
Helisweet - the interesting statistic from all those Guimbal accidents was zero fatalities, I assume that was your point of comparison to the Robinsons.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2017, 11:44
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brantisvogan
Posts: 509
There are also a few that are students losing the tail while near the ground, probably struggling with the fenestron.
Bell_ringer is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2017, 00:46
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CYQS
Age: 44
Posts: 301
The name is out now.

Karen Coulter.

I never met her, but tough loss regardless.

RIP
Winnie is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2017, 10:16
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Waltham Abbey, Essex, UK
Age: 73
Posts: 1,031
I would expect there to be more incidents with Robinson's than most other manufacture simply because of the numbers.

Slagging off Robinson for killing and burning many might be an acceptable issue if there was a similar thread highlighting the killing capabilities of the AS350/H125 series [and quite a few other legacy types].

The manufacturer of the AS350 spent a great deal of time and trouble enhancing the safety of their 40 years old design - so much so that the added safety was [is] effectively delivering the passengers to a funeral pyre. The timescale of those improvements is such that many crews that would have died in many an accident are, thanks to stroking seats and other improvements, now being killed by post-crash fire.

Putting right what may be the last detail - the creation of a crashworthy fuel tank - has taken 40 years. Far longer than Robinson has been an issue.

It may be that this 'final solution' for the AS350 will simply highlight another legacy killer in the design. For that we need to wait.
PANews is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2017, 12:14
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 7,445
The difference is about what is causing the crash - in the Robinsons there is still a higher proportion of mid-air breakups than any other make.

Which other make has such a history of rotor separation, MR to tail boom strikes and in-flight breakup?

If you are dead before you hit the ground then crashworthiness becomes irrelevant.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2017, 18:27
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,621
Crab
I m no Robinson fan but the Super Puma must be neck and neck with the Robinson
Hughes500 is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2017, 18:58
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: same planet as yours
Posts: 242
not following this thread, but as I just read the article in this link, I might as well post it here:
Robinson crash injures four at the Namur aerodrome in Temploux (Belgium) - Aviation24.be
DIBO is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2017, 22:16
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 7,445
Hughes500 - I know what you mean but it is the number of crashes to produce the high level of fatalities that is the poor Robinson stat - the Super Puma manages to achieve a high body count with far fewer accidents.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.