Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

UK: CAA prosecution: Infringement

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

UK: CAA prosecution: Infringement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st October 2015 | 18:19
  #21 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 118
Silsoe

Two bridges is better, certainly better food and there is a field next to the pub you can land in. Oh hang on a moment I haven't been there as it is in a NP and it is within the curtilage of a public house !!!
Hughes500 is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2015 | 19:54
  #22 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 2
From: yorkshire uk
I just take a view that if there is a strip of green you can fly over to get in and out then it is not congested area ...if there are back to back houses and no green all the way around then it is . Having said that if the landing site is big enough to be able to transition and climb to 1000ft before going over the houses go for it !!!
nigelh is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2015 | 20:45
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
From: UK
So who is going to answer the questions then

is a golf course a congested area ? I know lots of golf courses that have non approved helipads !!!!
is a hotel pad next to the hotel a congested area ?
is a rugby pitch with no one playing a congested area ?
The Air Navigation Order defines a congested area as being ‘any area of a city, town or settlement which is substantially used for residential, industrial, commercial or recreational purposes’
"Substantially used" are the key words, and is open to interpretation...
chopjock is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2015 | 21:40
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: uk
After the introduction of SERA you no longer need to get a rule 5,3,c permission / exemption for non CAT flights

CBS
CRAZYBROADSWORD is offline  
Reply
Old 1st November 2015 | 08:38
  #25 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 541
From: Lost again...
CrazyBroadsword.

That was, indeed, the CAA's positions several months ago and they did stop issuing rule five permissions for congested area landings for a time after SERA was introduced which, as you say, did remove the requirement.

They have now back peddled on this and rule five permissions ARE REQUIRED for congested area landings. Rules of The Air 2015 (March 2015) Section 2 para5(1).

OvertHawk is offline  
Reply
Old 1st November 2015 | 09:08
  #26 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
It would have been too optimistic to expect the CAA to surrender an income stream for long (Ł113 per application).
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 1st November 2015 | 14:48
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: uk
Thanks for that ! Too much to expect the rules to stay the same for more than a week or two
CRAZYBROADSWORD is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd November 2015 | 07:54
  #28 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
From: Do I come here often?
Hughes;

Take a look at Leicester Race Course (N51 35.5 W001 05.44) I was in there one evening a few years ago when the Feds arrived and took a Gazelle, a 206 and 4 Robbie 44 owners/pilots to bits for landing in a congested area without permission.

I was in one of two AOC twins in there with all the correct permissions and was amazed that three of the pilots had CPL's and no idea of the requirements, the Feds spent a LOT of time with those guys, especially as the 206 was on a public transport flight.

SND
Sir Niall Dementia is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd November 2015 | 08:23
  #29 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
I once arrived back at work (non AOC operator with a bit of a reputation) from leave to discover that ops had scheduled me to fly into Leicester racecourse a couple hours later. I asked where the CAA permission was and received a blank look......

I was put under some company pressure ( ) but I point blank refused to go, for exactly the reasons above. It's always the Captain's responsibility and Ops staff don't get taken to court, do they?
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd November 2015 | 08:26
  #30 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 118
SND

Leicester race course you have to overfly / flying into a built up area so obviously. Think the issue is when is an area congested and when is it not ?
To use the rugby pitch/s scenario as an example. If no one is playing on it / them and the club is not surrounded by houses etc etc is it congested ?
You could argue that it is used for substantially recreational use as the pitch isn't used for anything else so therefore it has a sole use of playing rugby on.
Like all things in life common sense has to prevail ( although if sense was common everyone would have it )
Hughes500 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd November 2015 | 08:37
  #31 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
From: Do I come here often?
Hughes;

For God's Sake Man. This helicopter aviation post EASA. Write out 100 times "I must not mention common sense."

Then see me in the library with your trousers over your left arm.

SND
Sir Niall Dementia is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd November 2015 | 09:48
  #32 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 2
From: yorkshire uk
A congested area has no route in or out that doesn't involve overflying property .
If a town/city was in a U shape , you could fly right into the centre of the U as it wouldn't involve overflying property ..a bit like the route to City Airport from the North . A rugby pitch or golf course in itself cannot be a congested area , but it could be landlocked inside a congested area . You need to look at the reason for the rule . It is all to do with having a safe landing spot in the event of engine failure on approach or landing . That is how I have decided over 30 years and never had any problems !!
nigelh is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd November 2015 | 17:17
  #33 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 118
SND

I had you down as trousers on the right arm with a funny left hand handshake in the Parlour !
Hughes500 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th November 2015 | 13:56
  #34 (permalink)  
Tightgit
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 806
Likes: 7
From: The artist formerly known as john du'pruyting
Handysnaks think recreational purpose as per the ANO

H500, The ANO specifies that the rule (in this case), applies to any city, town or settlement, not any and every area of countryside!
As just about every National Park is there because it is an area of spectacularly beautiful countryside, then the rule doesn't apply. The caveat of course, is that it does apply to a city, town or settlement that does happen to be in a national park!
handysnaks is offline  
Reply
Old 7th November 2015 | 06:34
  #35 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 118
Handysnaks,
My posts are trying to provoke people to think about where the are landing and what is and what is not congested because at times it is a difficult call !
Hughes500 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.