Converting ICAO ATPL (H) IR to EASA ATPL (H) IR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Converting ICAO ATPL (H) IR to EASA ATPL (H) IR
Hi,
I would like some guidance please.
My questions relate to the steps I need to take in order to convert an ICAO ATPL(H) / IR to an EASA ATPL (H) / IR.
I have the following:
a. A Multi Crew Co operation certificate.
b. I meet all the hours requirements for an EASA ATPL (H) according to CAP 804 para FCL 510.H
c. I have completed all 14 EASA ATPL (H) theoretical exams
d. I have a valid UK Med Class 1
e. I have over 350 hours on the BK117
f. I am in current flying practice on the BK117
g. I fulfil the requirements as per Annex III to Part FCL, C -1.
I read CAP 804 as stating that a holder of an ICAO ATPL (H) simply has to meet the hours requirements, have a valid class 1, pass the exams and then do a flight test as per appendix 9 under IFR conditions to achieve an EASA ATPL (H).
I have three and a half questions, they are:
1. Is the above statement correct?
2. Do I have to do the minimum hours of 15 hours (10 hours simulator and 5 hours aircraft) and an IR test to gain an EASA IR when converting my ICAO ATPL (H)? Is Section 4, Part Q Subpart 2, para 1.3 even relevant when I hold an ICAO ATPL(H)?
3. Can I conduct the type rating test and ATPL(H) check ride under IFR conditions in a full motion simulator in Germany to achieve my EASA ATPL (H)?
Any guidance is greatly appreciated.
I would like some guidance please.
My questions relate to the steps I need to take in order to convert an ICAO ATPL(H) / IR to an EASA ATPL (H) / IR.
I have the following:
a. A Multi Crew Co operation certificate.
b. I meet all the hours requirements for an EASA ATPL (H) according to CAP 804 para FCL 510.H
c. I have completed all 14 EASA ATPL (H) theoretical exams
d. I have a valid UK Med Class 1
e. I have over 350 hours on the BK117
f. I am in current flying practice on the BK117
g. I fulfil the requirements as per Annex III to Part FCL, C -1.
I read CAP 804 as stating that a holder of an ICAO ATPL (H) simply has to meet the hours requirements, have a valid class 1, pass the exams and then do a flight test as per appendix 9 under IFR conditions to achieve an EASA ATPL (H).
I have three and a half questions, they are:
1. Is the above statement correct?
2. Do I have to do the minimum hours of 15 hours (10 hours simulator and 5 hours aircraft) and an IR test to gain an EASA IR when converting my ICAO ATPL (H)? Is Section 4, Part Q Subpart 2, para 1.3 even relevant when I hold an ICAO ATPL(H)?
3. Can I conduct the type rating test and ATPL(H) check ride under IFR conditions in a full motion simulator in Germany to achieve my EASA ATPL (H)?
Any guidance is greatly appreciated.
I am certainly no expert but after reading this thread (http://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/541...ter-types.html), it would seem that you will need a MPH TR in order to qualify for an EASA ATPL(H).
You might struggle to convince the CAA that the BK117 is a MPH type.
Good luck anyway.
You might struggle to convince the CAA that the BK117 is a MPH type.
Good luck anyway.
Guest
Posts: n/a
In the current profile, the BK117 is operated as a MPH (as per FOM) in his current job…..
As long as he is doing the check ride in the simulator. he can get both-SP and MPH entry, as a simulator can be used for both (would not make sense to call a "training device" in which you can train EVERYTHING would only be limited to SPH or MPH)...
As long as he is doing the check ride in the simulator. he can get both-SP and MPH entry, as a simulator can be used for both (would not make sense to call a "training device" in which you can train EVERYTHING would only be limited to SPH or MPH)...
