Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Sikorsky spinoff?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Sikorsky spinoff?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th January 2014 | 21:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 289
From: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
Sikorsky spinoff?

Interesting article:
UTC Weighs Sikorsky's Future | Defense News | defensenews.com
Bryan
IFMU is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2014 | 14:17
  #2 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 727
Likes: 47
From: Earth
What a difference a few years makes; back in 2007 UTC was (rumored to be) on the verge of buying Bell when the tables were essentially reversed.
SansAnhedral is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2015 | 13:34
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 1
From: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
United Technologies to explore strategic alternatives for its Sikorsky Aircraft business
United Technologies Corp. has authorized a review of strategic alternatives for Sikorsky, including a potential tax-free spinoff.

"As part of the portfolio review announced last December, we are exploring strategic options for Sikorsky to determine the best way to enhance its long-term success and create improved long-term value for UTC's customers and shareholders," said UTC President & CEO Gregory Hayes.

"We are evaluating whether Sikorsky's unique business as a rotorcraft OEM with a predominately military customer base is best positioned as a stand-alone company, and whether a separation would allow United Technologies to better focus on providing high-technology systems and services to the aerospace and building industries."

UTC expects to conclude its strategic review before the end of the year. However, no specific timetable has been set, and there can be no assurance that a spinoff or any other transaction will take place.
I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2015 | 15:51
  #4 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 9,337
Likes: 2,185
From: Texas
The long rumored "consolidation of the rotary wing industry" seems to have grown fresh legs.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2015 | 20:42
  #5 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 724
Likes: 41
From: Arlington, Tx. US
Interesting. I guess all of those Canadian S-92 Cyclone development cost overruns and penalty payments did hurt.

The Sutlan
The Sultan is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2015 | 21:27
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 289
From: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
That probably hurt, but a precedent was a series of presidents that came from other companies. Something changed!
IFMU is offline  
Reply
Old 14th March 2015 | 21:25
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
From: USA
Sikorsky is currently profitable with EBITDA margins around 6%, but this is well below other divisions of UTC. Approximately 72% of Sikorsky's current revenues come from defense/government sales. Defense spending will likely continue its downward trend for the foreseeable future, which will make it hard for Sikorsky to remain profitable.

It appears UTC management sees this situation the same way. So UTC is looking to "spin off" (ie. dump) Sikorsky while they can get max value from it. I suspect UTC will probably saddle Sikorsky with some new debt before the "spin off" so they can pull cash out of the company.
riff_raff is offline  
Reply
Old 14th March 2015 | 21:46
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 912
Likes: 1
From: UK
Riff Raff is absolutely right but what changed was the departure of UTC President Louis Cheveneut,who refused to countenance a sell off. His replacement is not so nostalgic.
heli1 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th March 2015 | 08:23
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Europe
UTC's Sikorsky Spinoff: Good For UTC, Good For Sikorsky...Two Out Of Three Ain't Bad - Forbes

A very informative article. No cross Atlantic mergers and the only 'natural' merger in the States (Boeing & Sikorsky) would be blocked, most probably by Governments on both sides of the Atlantic.
espresso drinker is offline  
Reply
Old 26th March 2015 | 01:55
  #10 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 522
Likes: 77
From: USA
So it's confirmed. UT is divorcing Sikorsky. Once the smoke clears, I think things will turn out ok!
Sir Korsky is offline  
Reply
Old 16th June 2015 | 00:40
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere Warm
Sikorsky Future

News today that Sikorsky will be sold or spun off from United Technologies in the near future.

United Technologies to separate Sikorsky via sale or spinoff - MarketWatch
TrakBall is offline  
Reply
Old 16th June 2015 | 07:14
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Dear Mr Moderator, you might want to merge this thread with the thread entitled "Sikorsky Spinoff". Interesting to see Bell named as the likely buyer.
espresso drinker is offline  
Reply
Old 16th June 2015 | 10:17
  #13 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 57
From: UK
Originally Posted by espresso drinker
Interesting to see Bell named as the likely buyer.
I couldn't find any reference to Bell in that article. Only Boeing, Airbus and Lockheed Martin!
Bravo73 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th June 2015 | 14:44
  #14 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 724
Likes: 41
From: Arlington, Tx. US
All articles reference Textron. Bell is part of Textron.

The Sultan
The Sultan is offline  
Reply
Old 16th June 2015 | 17:17
  #15 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 57
From: UK
Originally Posted by The Sultan
All articles reference Textron. Bell is part of Textron.

The Sultan
Not the article in question:

Originally Posted by TrakBall
News today that Sikorsky will be sold or spun off from United Technologies in the near future.

United Technologies to separate Sikorsky via sale or spinoff - MarketWatch
Bravo73 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th June 2015 | 21:41
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 289
From: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
Will be interesting to see if Textron is the buyer- do Bell and Sikorsky stay separate, does Bell take over Sikorsky, or Sikorsky take over Bell?
IFMU is offline  
Reply
Old 17th June 2015 | 22:15
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
From: USA
Sikorsky seems to be in good shape financially for the near future, so they should do nicely on their own. But since much of their revenues are from military sales, they would also make a nice acquisition for a large defense business. Of the US companies mentioned LM might be a possibility. I doubt Textron(Bell) or Boeing would work out, primarily because the US DoD has been making a big push to expand the domestic rotorcraft industrial base, and not consolidate it. Maybe L-3 or Raytheon might have an interest.

I still don't accept UTC's (claimed) reason for selling off a fairly profitable division like Sikorsky. Less than a decade ago their Pratt & Whitney division was in far worse shape. P&W had few new orders for commercial engines and much of their revenues came from selling replacement parts. Then P&W decided to take a bold leap and bring their geared turbofan engine to market. Now P&W has orders for over 6,000 GTF engines. Sikorsky appeared to be doing the same thing with their internally funded X2 & S-97 programs. And if the Army continues with FVL, I think Sikorsky/LM have the best odds of winning the first contract.
riff_raff is offline  
Reply
Old 18th June 2015 | 01:53
  #18 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: North America
I still don't accept UTC's (claimed) reason for selling off a fairly profitable division like Sikorsky.
I don't buy it either. UTC CEO Gregory Hayes said the "separation of Sikorsky from the portfolio will allow both United Technologies and Sikorsky to better focus on their core businesses." United Technologies Corporation used to be United Aircraft Corporation. Sikorsky Aircraft sounds like a core business to me...much more so than an elevator company or an air conditioner company.
HeliTester is offline  
Reply
Old 18th June 2015 | 13:09
  #19 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 376
Likes: 4
From: Durham, NC USA
UT was the Sum of it's Brands

It wasn't that many years ago that few new who or what United Technologies was but they did know who Hamilton Standard, Pratt and Whitney, Otis, Carrier and Sikorsky were.
Jack Carson is offline  
Reply
Old 20th July 2015 | 00:46
  #20 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 724
Likes: 41
From: Arlington, Tx. US
Lockheed to Buy Sikorsky

Looks like a done deal:

Exclusive: Lockheed to buy United Tech's Sikorsky for over $8 billion | Reuters

At $8B plus it is does not look like a good deal (UTC surprised anyone would offer that as they wanted to get rid of it at any cost). As Lockheed aviation is exclusively military this does not bode well for Sikorsky's commercial customers. Maybe Tilton will accept them and lead to the shining experience the MD homeys enjoy.

The Sultan
The Sultan is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.