Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Is there a better aircraft than the 109AII for the price ?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Is there a better aircraft than the 109AII for the price ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jul 2013, 19:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is there a better aircraft than the 109AII for the price ?

I spent over 20 years flying but never felt inclined to have an A 109 . I was under the impression they were fast but expensive and unreliable . Since then the price of a good , mid hour example has come down to sub $750,000 ( sub £500,000 ). Having bought one a couple of years ago I cannot understand why more companies / people do not use them !!! Single pilot IFR Twin Engine 145 knot cruise ( easily ), 2hr 40 min to dry and so many cheap spares around . It has worked out at around 50% of the cost of running my AS350
and hasn't missed a beat in the last 400 Hrs
So for that sort of money what can compare ...ie 6 pax , speed and endurance , ifr and price ????? It is the same money as a mid 80,s MD500 ( great machine but no comparison on pax, speed ,comfort etc ) and a mid 90 JetRanger .....
nigelh is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 19:42
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Royal Leamington Spa
Age: 78
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree with some of your points but 6 pax is not realistic (at least not with any comfortable margins). But, if full pax isn't the primary concern then for a reliable light twin I would agree that on the surface, the Mk II appears to be a good value aircraft - not sure what kind of costs you're looking at for major overhauls mind you.

A strong plus, despite the lack of power compared to newer models, are the Allison donks. They (generally) just keep going and are not guzzlers.

Try giving this a read: http://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/435...109a-mkii.html
Anthony Supplebottom is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 21:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: My own planet
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A109AII

Interesting post, the very short answer is yes....

Things to look for if we haven’t turned you away from this Italianmama are Main Blade life’s, the boys and girls in Italy make the ‘old’ metal ones every blue moon so when you want a new set you will pay top dollar and that’s if they make it to full life as you still have an AD for blade cracks. Even a second hand set will set you back above pro rata prices.

The airframe, by default, is old, corroded and cracked cos the little bugger shakes like a fat girl on a washing machine. Your head pots only stop leaking when they have no oil in. The Allison C20B is old and puffed out with the AII+ being slightly better but not much. If you go for a C well there is no hope for you. The C was the test bed for the 109E M/R Blades and troublesome tail, need I say anymore????

Look at what toys have been added as that’s your fuel being drained away, toys mean weight and weight is an issue.

A109 Engineers all know each other and I can’t think of anyone in your area so be prepared to travel for experienced engineers, any Tom, Dickor H can tinker with this a/c but to keep it in the air when you pull pitch requires a chap/s on the ground who will nurse the old girl.

The two big checks are 2400hr (leave your wallet at the door) and the 3600Hr. Parts are cheap but when they are gone then they are gone ask any A109A operator/owner.

Other wise she's a real gem

Last edited by B1-3; 12th Jul 2013 at 21:10.
B1-3 is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 23:42
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by nigelh
Having bought one a couple of years ago
Originally Posted by nigelh
so many cheap spares around . It has worked out at around 50% of the cost of running my AS350 and hasn't missed a beat in the last 400 Hr
I suspect that nigelh may have a fair idea of what is needed to run an AII, don't you think?

I ran one for many years in Melbourne but it was expensive and the only 145kias that I saw was empty going downhill Lots of stories to tell, but as a cheap option to an AS350 I'm not sure that would hold up in Oz.
John Eacott is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2013, 11:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England & Scotland
Age: 63
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was tempted, but having researched the maintenance requirements / cost I was put-off.

My research indicates that the "bargain" twin is the AS355

Just as well that I am happy with singles, then.
John R81 is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2013, 13:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Uk
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
500k, you could get a brand spanking new R66 for that money
The Night Owl is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2013, 16:03
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: lancs.UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
500k, you could get a brand spanking new R66 for that money
13th Jul 2013 12:44
But would you have the requisite £3 1/2 K left over for a funeral?
cockney steve is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2013, 17:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England & Scotland
Age: 63
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gosh! Didn't realise the R66 was a twin.
John R81 is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2013, 19:58
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,387
Received 224 Likes on 103 Posts
Yeah, full fuel and pilot plus 1 you get those endurance times.

Put 6 pax in the back and you are down to 45 mins.

And in Oz, that severely limits where you can go. Might be different where you are.
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2013, 22:24
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Some good replies !!
Ref spares .....I have a complete bitser machine with good blades , XMSN etc etc bought for next to nothing ....so no big parts bills coming .
145 knots is actually when at max weight ....150 Knot when just me and one other .
Corrosion ....well no sign of any so far but it is going in for full back to metal respray next month so I will let you know !!
I can guarantee that if you know what you are doing it will be a lot cheaper than a 355 and a hell of a lot faster ...trust me !!!
I would buy one for £400 k odd and buy one for spares for £100k odd .....sell 50 hours to people for £50k and fly for nothing !!!!!!
Still no takers for a better machine . 355 I don't think so but maybe the very next best thing .
nigelh is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2013, 12:05
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: hayling island
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The old one's are the best keep away from anything that will require major expense, such main rotor gearbox, main blades or engine work (but not always expensive if you have C20's).
Nice stable single pilot IFR platform.
Also keep inside not good if damp, Italian electrics, work very well if looked after.
timprice is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2013, 12:30
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Royal Leamington Spa
Age: 78
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Still no takers for a better machine?
Okay, I'll have a go!

1 x Bell 222 @ £200k + 1 spares ship @ £100k but with the best part of the deal being that you get that classic Bell blade slap for free!
Anthony Supplebottom is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2013, 16:44
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ok ...... But how many are out there cheap and grounded but otherwise good comp times ? There are loads of 109,s grounded now due to the 250 containment rings ... They are trickling onto the market for pennies providing a massive inventory of cheap parts for the ones remaining. .
Also the 109 is quicker and uses far far less fuel .
Lastly I believe there are places where the 222 is either banned or unwelcome due to noise .

Good try

Ps. I think training and check rides will get more difficult as well due to a lack of rated pilots ..?
nigelh is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2013, 16:57
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Royal Leamington Spa
Age: 78
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah well, I said I'd have a go!

Nigel, you seem totally convinced with the Mk II - and I'm sure Castle Air wouldn't disagree with you given their experience with the type.

Seeing as you're so certain of this heli's continuing viability, why not buy 4 or 5 airframes, keep a couple for spares and do up 2 or 3 for sale. Given your belief in them I am sure you would be able to shift them!
Anthony Supplebottom is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2013, 22:39
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What a jolly good idea .... I hadn't thought of that. !!!!!!
Castle Air do a very good job with their 109,s ...... I was just genuinely interested how and why someone with £4 -500k to spend would buy anything else . It seems the next best thing would be a big jump in purchase price and operating cost of a Power ? And for the extra £1m you get very very little extra performance . I think the Mk 11 could well appreciate in value over the next 2-5 years ....just as the MD500 D has done .
So ... Who wants to buy one ???!!!!!
nigelh is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2013, 17:15
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Where it rains a lot .....
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When you looking at getting airborne with it Nigel
nellycopter is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2013, 19:45
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London/Atlanta
Posts: 446
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Nigelh

With the greatest of respect I don't know anything that flys, floats or f**ks that appreciates, any clarication on this would be marvellous!

Regards
nomorehelosforme is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2013, 23:35
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well I am afraid I would have to disagree !!! I have owned 8 helicopters over the last 25yrs and I have only lost money on 1 , my AS350BA which I actually sold for £75k more than I paid ... But sadly had to spend £150k on Engine FOD damage first !! Recently I made a profit on my Enstrom 480B . A profit on a MD 500C. ( if I had bought the D I would have made twice the profit ) .
I bought my first 109 about 4 years ago when they were £500. - 600k for a mid 1980,s with good times . I have now bought another really nice machine and flown it for around 500 hours over the last couple of years . It is in paint at present and will look beautiful when it comes out and I am sure will be worth around £450 - 470k .....if I get an offer I may take it but I firmly believe they will go up by 20% over the next 3-5 years . Just look at the cost of the next step up to a Power .........and its now cheaper than many 500,s of the same age and TT .....
nigelh is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2013, 23:44
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London/Atlanta
Posts: 446
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Nigelh

I can only assume you are a dealer? Especially after you reference to Castle Air? If you are indeed a dealer why even start this thread?
nomorehelosforme is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2013, 23:46
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon, US
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keep in mind.
A huge reason the prices of 500s have gone up is their use in powerline applications which have exploded in the past 5 years and the discontinuation of the 206.
500guy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.